Florida Statute 121.133 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title X
PUBLIC OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES, AND RECORDS

Chapter 121
FLORIDA RETIREMENT SYSTEM

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 121.133

121.133 Cancellation of uncashed warrants.—Notwithstanding the provisions of s. 17.26 or s. 717.123 to the contrary, if any state warrant issued by the Chief Financial Officer for the payment of retirement benefits from the Florida Retirement System Trust Fund, or any other pension trust fund administered by the department, is not presented for payment within 1 year after the last day of the month in which it was originally issued, the Chief Financial Officer shall cancel the benefit warrant and credit the amount of the warrant to the Florida Retirement System Trust Fund or other pension trust fund administered by the department, as appropriate. The department may provide for issuance of a replacement warrant when deemed appropriate.

History.—s. 12, ch. 98-413; s. 40, ch. 99-255; s. 143, ch. 2003-261.

F.S. 121.133 on Google Scholar

F.S. 121.133 on Casetext

Amendments to 121.133

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 121.133

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 121.133.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 121.133

Total Results: 8

DONOVAN M. HENRY v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-09-12

Citation: 255 So. 3d 365

Snippet: viewed in context. See Mendoza v. State, 964 So. 2d 121, 133 (Fla. 2007) (“To constitute fundamental error

Leo Louis Kaczmar, III v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-01-31

Citation: 228 So. 3d 1

Snippet: fundamental error. See Mendoza v. State, 964 So.2d 121, 133 (Fla. 2007). Accordingly, Kaczmar is not entitled

Dismex Food, Inc. v. Harris

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-06-01

Citation: 194 So. 3d 497, 2016 WL 3078099, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 8286

Snippet: meritless. See Mendoza v. State, 964 So.2d 121, 133 (Fla.2007); see also Steinhorst v. State

Timothy W. Fletcher v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-06-25

Citation: 168 So. 3d 186, 40 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 366, 2015 Fla. LEXIS 1387

Snippet: verdict. See Mendoza v. State, 964 So.2d 121, 133 (Fla.2007). The phrase “send a message” was iterated

Ramirez v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2013-01-16

Citation: 125 So. 3d 171, 2013 WL 163461, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 569

Snippet: fundamental error. See Mendoza v. State, 964 So.2d 121, 133 (Fla.2007)). Improper comments rise to the level

Dailey v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2007-05-31

Citation: 965 So. 2d 38, 2007 WL 1556674

Snippet: insufficiently argued. See Lawrence v. State, 831 So.2d 121, 133 (Fla.2002). We affirm the denial of Dailey's claim

Kopsho v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2007-05-24

Citation: 959 So. 2d 168, 2007 WL 1499007

Snippet: 2001); State v. Quintana, 261 Neb. 38, 621 N.W.2d 121, 133-34 (2001); Blake v. State, 121 Nev. 779, 121 P

Sochor v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2004-07-08

Citation: 883 So. 2d 766, 2004 WL 1515963

Snippet: error"); see also Lawrence v. State, 831 So.2d 121, 133 (Fla. *788 2002) ("A defendant may not simply