Florida Statutes
Fla. Stat. § 125.69 (2025)
Penalties; enforcement by code inspectors.
✓ 2025 Florida Statutes — current through the 2025 Regular Session
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
125.69 Penalties; enforcement by code inspectors.—
(1) Violations of county ordinances shall be prosecuted in the same manner as misdemeanors are prosecuted. Such violations shall be prosecuted in the name of the state in a court having jurisdiction of misdemeanors by the prosecuting attorney thereof and upon conviction shall be punished by a fine not to exceed $500 or by imprisonment in the county jail not to exceed 60 days or by both such fine and imprisonment. However, a county may specify, by ordinance, a violation of a county ordinance which is punishable by a fine in an amount exceeding $500, but not exceeding $2,000 a day, if the county must have authority to punish a violation of that ordinance by a fine in an amount greater than $500 in order for the county to carry out a federally mandated program. A county may also specify, by ordinance, that a violation of any provision of a county ordinance imposing standards of conduct and disclosure requirements as provided in s. 112.326 is punishable by a fine not to exceed $1,000 or a term of imprisonment in the county jail not to exceed 1 year.
(2) Each county is authorized and required to pay any attorney appointed by the court to represent a defendant charged with a criminal violation of a special law or county ordinance not ancillary to a state charge if the defendant is indigent and otherwise entitled to court-appointed counsel under the Constitution of the United States or the Constitution of the State of Florida. In these cases, the court shall appoint counsel to represent the defendant in accordance with s. 27.40, and shall order the county to pay the reasonable attorney’s fees, costs, and related expenses of the defense. The county may contract with the public defender or the office of criminal conflict and civil regional counsel for the judicial circuit in which the county is located to serve as court-appointed counsel pursuant to s. 27.54.
(3) If the county is the prevailing party, the county may recover the court fees and costs paid by it and the fees and expenses paid to court-appointed counsel as part of its judgment. The state shall bear no expense of actions brought under this section except those that it would bear in an ordinary civil action between private parties in county court.
(4)(a) The board of county commissioners of each county may designate its agents or employees as code inspectors whose duty it is to assure code compliance. Any person designated as a code inspector may issue citations for violations of county codes and ordinances, respectively, or subsequent amendments thereto, when such code inspector has actual knowledge that a violation has been committed.
(b) A person designated as a code inspector may not initiate an investigation of a potential violation of a duly enacted code or ordinance by way of an anonymous complaint. A person who reports a potential violation of a code or an ordinance must provide his or her name and address to the governing body of the respective board of county commissioners before an investigation occurs. This paragraph does not apply if the person designated as a code inspector has reason to believe that the violation presents an imminent threat to public health, safety, or welfare or imminent destruction of habitat or sensitive resources.
(c) Prior to issuing a citation, a code inspector shall provide notice to the violator that the violator has committed a violation of a code or ordinance and shall establish a reasonable time period within which the violator must correct the violation. Such time period shall be no more than 30 days. If, upon personal investigation, a code inspector finds that the violator has not corrected the violation within the time period, a code inspector may issue a citation to the violator. A code inspector does not have to provide the violator with a reasonable time period to correct the violation prior to issuing a citation and may immediately issue a citation if the code inspector has reason to believe that the violation presents a serious threat to the public health, safety, or welfare, or if the violation is irreparable or irreversible.
(d) A citation issued by a code inspector shall state the date and time of issuance, name and address of the person in violation, date of the violation, section of the codes or ordinances, or subsequent amendments thereto, violated, name of the code inspector, and date and time when the violator shall appear in county court.
(e) If a repeat violation is found subsequent to the issuance of a citation, the code inspector is not required to give the violator a reasonable time to correct the violation and may immediately issue a citation. For purposes of this subsection, the term “repeat violation” means a violation of a provision of a code or ordinance by a person who has previously been found to have violated the same provision within 5 years prior to the violation, notwithstanding the violations occurred at different locations.
(f) If the owner of property which is subject to an enforcement proceeding before county court transfers ownership of such property between the time the initial citation or citations are issued and the date the violator has been summoned to appear in county court, such owner shall:
1. Disclose, in writing, the existence and the nature of the proceeding to the prospective transferee.
2. Deliver to the prospective transferee a copy of the pleadings, notices, and other materials relating to the county court proceeding received by the transferor.
3. Disclose, in writing, to the prospective transferee that the new owner will be responsible for compliance with the applicable code and with orders issued in the county court proceeding.
4. File a notice with the code enforcement official of the transfer of the property, with the identity and address of the new owner and copies of the disclosures made to the new owner, within 5 days after the date of the transfer.
A failure to make the disclosure described in subparagraphs 1., 2., and 3. before the transfer creates a rebuttable presumption of fraud. If the property is transferred before the date the violator has been summoned to appear in county court, the proceeding shall not be dismissed but the new owner will be substituted as the party of record and thereafter provided a reasonable period of time to correct the violation before the continuation of proceedings in county court.
(g) If the code inspector has reason to believe a violation or the condition causing the violation presents a serious threat to the public health, safety, and welfare or if the violation is irreparable or irreversible in nature, or if after attempts under this section to bring a repeat violation into compliance with a provision of a code or ordinance prove unsuccessful, the local governing body may make all reasonable repairs which are required to bring the property into compliance and charge the owner with the reasonable cost of the repairs along with the fine imposed pursuant to this section. Making such repairs does not create a continuing obligation on the part of the local governing body to make further repairs or to maintain the property and does not create any liability against the local governing body for any damages to the property if such repairs were completed in good faith.
(h) Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to authorize any person designated as a code inspector to perform any function or duties of a law enforcement officer other than as specified in this subsection. A code inspector shall not make physical arrests or take any person into custody and shall be exempt from requirements relating to the Special Risk Class of the Florida Retirement System, bonding, and the Criminal Justice Standards and Training Commission, as defined and provided by general law.
(i) The provisions of this subsection shall not apply to the enforcement pursuant to ss. 553.79 and 553.80 of the Florida Building Code adopted pursuant to s. 553.73 as applied to construction, provided that a building permit is either not required or has been issued by the county.
(j) The provisions of this subsection may be used by a county in lieu of the provisions of part II of chapter 162.
(k) The provisions of this subsection are additional or supplemental means of enforcing county codes and ordinances. Except as provided in paragraphs (b) and (j), nothing in this subsection shall prohibit a county from enforcing its codes or ordinances by any other means.
History.—s. 3, ch. 69-234; ss. 1, 2, ch. 70-452; s. 1, ch. 79-379; s. 12, ch. 89-268; s. 1, ch. 90-37; s. 1, ch. 98-287; s. 1, ch. 99-360; s. 113, ch. 2000-141; s. 35, ch. 2001-186; s. 4, ch. 2001-372; s. 80, ch. 2003-402; s. 52, ch. 2004-265; s. 26, ch. 2007-62; s. 1, ch. 2010-112; s. 1, ch. 2021-167.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 24
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1978–2024 · leading case: Kim D. Lee v. Luis Ferraro, 284 F.3d 1188 (11th Cir. 2002).
Kim D. Lee v. Luis Ferraro, 284 F.3d 1188 (11th Cir. 2002). “See generally Fla. Stat. Ann. § 125.69 (1) (stating that violations of county ordinances carrying possible jail sentences “shall be prosecuted in the same manner as misdemeanors are prosecuted”).”
Phantom of Clearwater v. Pinellas Cnty., 894 So. 2d 1011 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005). “15 and prosecution pursuant to Florida Statutes, § 125.69. These sanctions are in addition to any criminal penalty which is available under the provisions of Chapter 791, Florida Statutes.”
Movie & Video World, Inc. v. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners, 723 F. Supp. 695 (S.D. Fla. 1989). “rt III(B)(C) and IV of this Ordinance where no specific penalties are provided and (1) any act is prohibited, or is made or declared to be *714 unlawful, or an offense, or (2) whenever in this Ordinance the doing of any act is required or the failure to do any act is declared to…”
Joseph Richard Redner v. Charles S. Dean, Sheriff of Citrus Cnty., Florida, Robert A. Butterworth, 29 F.3d 1495 (11th Cir. 1994). “Whoever violates any Section of SECTION 5 of this Ordinance may be prosecuted and punished as provided by Section 125.69, Florida Statutes (1985). SECTION 6.”
State v. Wise, 603 So. 2d 61 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). “See § 125.69(1), Fla. Stat. (1991). Thus, the deputy was statutorily authorized to make this stop to ascertain the identity of the driver and the "circumstances of his presence abroad.”
State v. Smith, 584 So. 2d 145 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). “See § 125.69, Fla. Stat. (1989). The question in this case is whether the county can create a criminal offense when the state has expressly created a noncriminal infraction to govern the same conduct.”
Blue Moon Enter., Inc. v. Pinellas Cnty. Dep't of Consum. Prot., 97 F. Supp. 2d 1134 (M.D. Fla. 2000). “Additionally, the enforcement provision of the Code states that such violations may be prosecuted and punished as provided by Florida Statutes section 125.69 (1990). 2 *1138 Plaintiffs operate their adult entertainment establishments under the appropriate adult use licenses…”
Davis v. State, 928 So. 2d 442 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006). “Section 125.69(1), Florida Statutes (2001), provides that violations of county ordinances shall be prosecuted in the same manner as misdemeanors.”
P.P. v. State, 466 So. 2d 1140 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985). “was found delinquent as charged. This appeal follows.”
Jorgenson v. Cnty. of Volusia, 625 F. Supp. 1543 (M.D. Fla. 1986). “§ 125.69, Fla.Stat. (1985). Section 9 provides for the severability of any portion of the ordinance found to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction.”
State v. Stevens, 421 So. 2d 41 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). “When the officer asked the defendant for his real name, he reinforced his previous answers in replying, “I already told you.”
Am. Charities for Reasonable Fundraising Reg., Inc. v. Pinellas Cnty., 32 F. Supp. 2d 1308 (M.D. Fla. 1998). “§§ 125.69(2)(a), 162.06 (West 1998). Then if the County seeks to enjoin a nonresident, there must be: 1) sufficient jurisdictional facts to come within Florida’s long-arm statute, § 48.”
— 125.69(1) — 4 cases
State v. Wise, 603 So. 2d 61 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). “See § 125.69(1), Fla. Stat. (1991). Thus, the deputy was statutorily authorized to make this stop to ascertain the identity of the driver and the "circumstances of his presence abroad.”
Davis v. State, 928 So. 2d 442 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006). “Section 125.69(1), Florida Statutes (2001), provides that violations of county ordinances shall be prosecuted in the same manner as misdemeanors.”
Blue Moon Enter., Inc. v. Pinellas Cnty. Dep't of Consum. Prot., 97 F. Supp. 2d 1134 (M.D. Fla. 2000). “Additionally, the enforcement provision of the Code states that such violations may be prosecuted and punished as provided by Florida Statutes section 125.69 (1990). 2 *1138 Plaintiffs operate their adult entertainment establishments under the appropriate adult use licenses…”
AURA NIGHTCLUB v. Orange Cnty., 166 F. Supp. 2d 1358 (M.D. Fla. 2001).
— 125.69(2)(a) — 1 case
Am. Charities for Reasonable Fundraising Reg., Inc. v. Pinellas Cnty., 32 F. Supp. 2d 1308 (M.D. Fla. 1998). “§§ 125.69(2)(a), 162.06 (West 1998). Then if the County seeks to enjoin a nonresident, there must be: 1) sufficient jurisdictional facts to come within Florida’s long-arm statute, § 48.”
— 125.69(4)(f) — 1 case
Katina Paese v. State of Florida (Fla. 4th DCA 2024).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.