Cases from cite.case.law:

SPARTON CORPORATION, v. UNITED STATES,, 89 Fed. Cl. 190 (Fed. Cl. 2009)

. . . DX-130.15. . . . DX-130.15. . . . .

In MIDDENDORF, 381 B.R. 774 (Bankr. D. Kan. 2008)

. . . date, Debtors made multiple payments from their bank account which resulted in an account balance of $130.15 . . .

In A. BENSON, R. v. A. In R. v., 363 B.R. 415 (Bankr. W.D. Pa. 2007)

. . . These amounts respectively are $130.15 and $198.91 greater than the amount debtor projects she would . . .

Z. BUTLER v. RAPIDES FOUNDATION,, 365 F. Supp. 2d 787 (W.D. La. 2005)

. . . According to Exhibit A, a total of 130.15 hours were spent on this case. . . .

PEOPLE OF THE TERRITORY OF GUAM, v. CRUZ,, 913 F.2d 748 (9th Cir. 1990)

. . . . § 130.15 (1985). . . .

PEOPLE OF THE TERRITORY OF GUAM, v. J. QUEZADA, PEOPLE OF THE TERRITORY OF GUAM, v. J. QUEZADA,, 905 F.2d 263 (9th Cir. 1990)

. . . . § 130.15 (1985). . . .

PEOPLE OF TERRITORY OF GUAM, v. TEIXEIRA,, 859 F.2d 120 (9th Cir. 1988)

. . . . § 130.15(a). We have jurisdiction over this appeal under 48 U.S.C. § 1424-3(c). . . . .

PEOPLE OF THE TERRITORY OF GUAM, v. GENTAPANAN,, 848 F.2d 992 (9th Cir. 1988)

. . . after a conviction following a plea of no contest as that procedure is set out in Guam Crim.Proc.Code § 130.15 . . . Id. § 130.15, note. The statute is not relevant here. . . . . § 130.15(c), which provides for appeals from “any order made after judgment affecting the substantial . . .

ALDAN, v. A. SALAS,, 718 F.2d 889 (9th Cir. 1983)

. . . the Appellate Division of the District Court of Guam pursuant to Guam Code of Criminal Procedure § 130.15 . . . for Guam to the Appellate Division of the District Court of Guam pursuant to Guam Code Crim.Proc. § 130.15 . . . Section 130.15(c), Guam Code of Criminal Procedure, provides: An appeal may be taken by the defendant . . .

PEOPLE OF TERRITORY OF GUAM, v. DISTRICT COURT OF GUAM, L. JAMES,, 641 F.2d 816 (9th Cir. 1981)

. . . . § 130.15. There is no general right to an interlocutory appeal. . . .

UNITED STATES CANNON, v. L. MONTANYE,, 486 F.2d 263 (2d Cir. 1973)

. . . . § 130.15 (McKinney’s Consol. Laws, c. 40 Supp.1972). Here, Mrs. . . .

UNITED STATES SMILEY, v. J. LaVALLEE,, 473 F.2d 682 (2d Cir. 1973)

. . . before the Grand Jury for lack of the corroboration of the victim required by New York Penal Law § 130.15 . . .

V. MILLER v. ROCKEFELLER, Lt. Lt., 327 F. Supp. 542 (S.D.N.Y. 1971)

. . . they have previously been offered and have refused non-judicial punishment under the provisions of § 130.15 . . . summary court-martial (unless they have been offered and have refused non-judicial punishment under § 130.15 . . .

AMERICAN OIL COMPANY, a v. BROWN PAVING COMPANY, a a, 298 F. Supp. 528 (D.S.C. 1969)

. . . Of this amount, $78,600.62, paid on January 24, was derived from the Scotland project and $7,-130.15, . . .

UNITED STATES JEFFERSON, v. W. FOLLETTE,, 396 F.2d 862 (2d Cir. 1968)

. . . Penal Law § 130.15 (McKinney’s Consol.Laws, c. 40, 1967)), the state introduced into evidence a statement . . .