Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 132.11 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 132.11 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 132.11

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XI
COUNTY ORGANIZATION AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS
Chapter 132
GENERAL REFUNDING LAW
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 132.11
132.11 Amount of refunding bonds to be sold.In case of refunding bonds which are not exchanged for bonds outstanding but are sold, only such amount thereof shall be delivered as is necessary to provide for the payment of matured bonds and legally accrued interest and of such unmatured bonds as the holders thereof have agreed in writing to surrender upon payment of a sum not exceeding par and legally accrued interest.
History.s. 11, ch. 15772, 1931; CGL 1936 Supp. 2383(11).

F.S. 132.11 on Google Scholar

F.S. 132.11 on Casetext

Amendments to 132.11


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 132.11
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 132.11.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

A. MURPHY, v. UNITED STATES,, 130 Fed. Cl. 554 (Fed. Cl. 2017)

. . . . §§ 5922, 6923(a); Department of State Standardized Regulations (“DSSR”) §§ 132.4, 132.11, 136; Department . . . a LQA commenced, when the Army reassigned him to Italy for a second tour of duty, under the DSSR § 132.11 . . . to the Overseas Differentials and Allowances Act (the “Act”), 5 U.S.C. §§ 6922-23, and the DSSR §§ 132.11 . . . Plaintiff responds that he is entitled under the DSSR § 132.11 to a LQA as of June 18, 2012, because . . . DSSR § 132.11. . . . .

In VOLKSWAGEN AND AUDI WARRANTY EXTENSION LITIGATION, 89 F. Supp. 3d 155 (D. Mass. 2015)

. . . challenge more significant portions of time purportedly attributable to excessive conferencing and e-mails (132.11 . . .

DMV USA, v., 25 Ct. Int'l Trade 970 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2001)

. . . . § 132.11(a) (1997). . . .

CITY ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. v. U. S. CHEMICAL COMPANY,, 814 F. Supp. 624 (E.D. Mich. 1993)

. . . sheet listed assets in the amount of $1,148,874.44 and shareholder equity in the amount of $1,044,-132.11 . . .

UNITED STATES v. CITY OF MANASSAS, VIRGINIA L. H., 627 F. Supp. 645 (E.D. Va. 1986)

. . . . § 62.1-132.11. . . .

M. WOHL, v. STATE, 480 So. 2d 639 (Fla. 1985)

. . . It is also contrary to sections 132.11, 132.-14, and 215.79(2), Florida Statutes (1983), all of which . . . Section 132.11, entitled Amount of refunding bonds to be sold, limits the amount to that “necessary to . . .

STATE v. CITY OF DAYTONA BEACH,, 360 So. 2d 777 (Fla. 1978)

. . . Statutes (1977), apply to the proposed refunding bonds and the proposed refunding plan violates Sections 132.11 . . .

GROVE PRESS, INC. v. B. FLASK, 326 F. Supp. 574 (N.D. Ohio 1970)

. . . which, if engaged in offstage or offscreen and in public would be subject to prosecution under Section 132.11 . . .

UNITED STATES v. AKRON, CANTON YOUNGSTOWN RAILROAD COMPANY,, 397 F.2d 139 (6th Cir. 1968)

. . . Section 132.11(c) provides: “(c) Each train must have the air brakes in effective operating condition . . . the applicable standard for the piston travel, i. e. 10 inches, is set forth separately in Section 132.11 . . . related orders issued by the Interstate Commerce Commission, and, especially, the provisions of Section 132.11 . . . these sections prescribe air brake tests, they do not provide for the piston travel test in Section 132.11 . . .

UNITED STATES v. OGDEN UNION RAILWAY AND DEPOT COMPANY,, 370 F.2d 540 (10th Cir. 1966)

. . . Regulation 132.11(c), 49 C.F.R. § 132.11(c), adopted following the amendment, still refers exclusively . . .

UNITED STATES v. CARBON COUNTY RAILWAY COMPANY,, 199 F. Supp. 726 (D. Utah 1961)

. . . Section 132.11, concerning train air brake system tests, says that “supervisors are jointly responsible . . .

LAMBERTH v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, 120 F.2d 101 (9th Cir. 1941)

. . . decision of the Board of Tax Appeals sustaining a determination by the Commissioner of a deficiency of $132.11 . . .

HARRY F. WAITE v. THE UNITED STATES, 69 Ct. Cl. 153 (Ct. Cl. 1930)

. . . and the gross profit per unit, omitting overhead, would have been— Item Cost Vertical fluoroscope-$132.11 . . .