Florida Statute 132.11 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XI
COUNTY ORGANIZATION AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS

Chapter 132
GENERAL REFUNDING LAW

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 132.11

132.11 Amount of refunding bonds to be sold.—In case of refunding bonds which are not exchanged for bonds outstanding but are sold, only such amount thereof shall be delivered as is necessary to provide for the payment of matured bonds and legally accrued interest and of such unmatured bonds as the holders thereof have agreed in writing to surrender upon payment of a sum not exceeding par and legally accrued interest.

History.—s. 11, ch. 15772, 1931; CGL 1936 Supp. 2383(11).

F.S. 132.11 on Google Scholar

F.S. 132.11 on Casetext

Amendments to 132.11

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 132.11

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 132.11.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 132.11

Total Results: 15

Wohl v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-12-19

Citation: 480 So. 2d 639, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 10

Snippet: the constitution. It is also contrary to sections 132.11, 132.14, and 215.79(2), Florida Statutes (1983)

Coxwell v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1978-07-20

Citation: 361 So. 2d 148

Snippet: So.2d at 896. [13] Tischler v. Apple, 30 Fla. 132, 11 So. 273 (1892). [14] See Johnson v. Reynolds,

State v. City of Daytona Beach

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1978-06-30

Citation: 360 So. 2d 777, 1978 Fla. LEXIS 4849

Snippet: and the proposed refunding plan violates Sections 132.11 and 159.13; that the proposed issue does not constitute

Delano Hotel, Inc. v. Gold

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1961-02-02

Citation: 126 So. 2d 301

Snippet: bring reversal. See Tischler v. Apple, 30 Fla. 132, 11 So. 273; Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Peeples

Parker v. Perfection Cooperative Dairies

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1958-02-05

Citation: 102 So. 2d 645

Snippet: R. Co., 74 Kan. 528, 87 P. 680, 7 L.R.A.,N.S., 132, 11 Ann. Cas. 207. "But such a charge as that just

Lineberger v. Domino Canning Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1953-07-24

Citation: 68 So. 2d 357, 1953 Fla. LEXIS 1739

Snippet: Fla. 248, 10 So. 588; Tischler v. Apple, 30 Fla. 132, 11 So. 273; Walker v. State, 34 Fla. 167, 16 So. 80;

Merchants Transportation Co. v. Daniel

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1933-04-22

Citation: 149 So. 401, 109 Fla. 496

Snippet: 74 Kan. 528, 87 Pac. Rep. 680, 7 L.R.A. (N.S.) 132, 11 Ann. Cas. 207. But such a charge as that just referred

Chandler v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1927-05-16

Citation: 113 So. 91, 93 Fla. 1063

Snippet: Revised General Statutes; Tischler v. Apple, 30 Fla. 132, 11 South. Rep. 273; Wallace v. State, 41 Fla. 547

Gainesville & Gulf Railroad v. Peck

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1908-01-15

Citation: 55 Fla. 402

Snippet: 10 South. Rep. 588; Tischler v. Apple, 30 Fla. 132, 11 South. Rep. 273; Walker v. State, 34 Fla. 167,

Weeks v. Hays

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1908-01-15

Citation: 55 Fla. 370

Snippet: McDonald, 14 Fla. 66; Tischler v. Apple, 30 Fla. 132, 11 South. Rep. 273; Coker v. Hayes, 16 Fla. 368; Walker

Hampton v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1905-06-15

Citation: 50 Fla. 55

Snippet: 10 South. Rep. 106; Tischler v. Apple, 30 Fla. 132, 11 South. Rep. 273; Williams alias Lattimore v. State

Wallace v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1899-06-15

Citation: 41 Fla. 547, 26 So. 713

Snippet: 9 South. Rep. 448; Tischler v. Apple, 30 Fla. 132, 11 South. Rep. 273. And he may also be interrogated

Bucki v. Seitz

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1897-01-15

Citation: 39 Fla. 55

Snippet: Rep. 127; Tischler vs. Apple & Finley, 30 Fla. 132, 11 South. Rep. 273; Roof vs. Chattanooga Wood Split

Thalheim v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1896-06-15

Citation: 38 Fla. 169

Snippet: South. Rep. 106;. Tischler vs. Apple, 30 Fla. 132, 11 South. Rep. 273. B. Arentz, a witness for the State

Williams v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1893-06-15

Citation: 32 Fla. 315

Snippet: Rep., 106; Tischler vs. Apple & Finlay, 30 Fla., 132, 11 South. Rep., 273. The deceased was shot and killed