Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 137 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 137 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 137

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XI
COUNTY ORGANIZATION AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS
Chapter 137
BONDS OF COUNTY OFFICERS
View Entire Chapter
CHAPTER 137
CHAPTER 137
BONDS OF COUNTY OFFICERS
137.01 Bonds required by the board of county commissioners for county officers.
137.02 Bond of tax collector.
137.03 Bond of property appraisers.
137.04 County commissioners to give bond.
137.05 Duty of boards of county commissioners.
137.08 Sums for which sureties may be bound.
137.09 Justification and approval of bonds.
137.10 Provisions not applicable to surety companies.
137.01 Bonds required by the board of county commissioners for county officers.—Each board of county commissioners may by ordinance require any county officer to give bond, conditioned for the faithful performance of the duties of his or her office. The amount of the bond and the bond must be approved by the board of county commissioners. In determining the amount of the bond, the board of county commissioners may consider the amount of money or property likely to be in custody of the county officer at any one time. The bond of each of the county officers of whom a bond is required must be filed with the clerk of the circuit court.
History.—s. 1, ch. 3724, 1887; RS 616; GS 822; RGS 1568; CGL 2416; ss. 10, 12, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 837, ch. 95-147; s. 28, ch. 95-312; s. 20, ch. 98-34.
137.02 Bond of tax collector.—The tax collector of each county shall give bond as required by the board of county commissioners of the respective county, specifically conditioned to account duly and faithfully for all taxes collected by the tax collector. In fixing the bond the board of county commissioners may consider the amount of money likely to be in the custody of the collector at any one time.
History.—s. 5, ch. 3724, 1887; RS 617; GS 823; RGS 1569; s. 1, ch. 10033, 1925; CGL 2417; ss. 12, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 1, ch. 76-140; s. 29, ch. 95-312; s. 21, ch. 98-34.
137.03 Bond of property appraisers.—The county property appraiser shall give a bond as required by the board of county commissioners. In fixing the amount of the bond, the board of county commissioners may consider the amount of money likely to be in the custody of the property appraiser at any one time.
History.—s. 7, ch. 3724, 1887; s. 1, ch. 3844, 1889; RS 618, 619; GS 824; RGS 1570; CGL 2418; s. 1, ch. 28294, 1953; s. 3, ch. 73-47; s. 1, ch. 77-102; s. 22, ch. 98-34.
137.04 County commissioners to give bond.—Each county commissioner, whether elected or appointed to such office, must give a bond conditioned for the faithful performance of the duties of his or her office as required by the board of county commissioners. The premium of the bonds given must be paid out of the county treasury.
History.—s. 1, ch. 6477, 1913; RGS 1571; CGL 2419; ss. 12, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 838, ch. 95-147; s. 30, ch. 95-312; s. 23, ch. 98-34.
137.05 Duty of boards of county commissioners.—The board of county commissioners of each county shall at its regular meetings in January and June of each year examine carefully as to the sufficiency of bonds of the county officers, and if it has reason to believe that the sufficiency of any bond has become impaired, it must at once require the officer to execute and file with the proper officer a new bond for the same amount and under the same conditions as his or her former bond.
History.—s. 2, ch. 4413, 1895; GS 825; RGS 1572; CGL 2420; s. 839, ch. 95-147; s. 24, ch. 98-34.
137.08 Sums for which sureties may be bound.—In every bond in which the amount of the bond shall not exceed $1,000, there shall be at least two sureties, each bound for the full amount of the bond. In every bond so specified in which the amount of the bond shall exceed $1,000, each surety may bind himself or herself for a specified sum, and the aggregate amount for which the sureties shall bind themselves shall not be less than the penalty of the bond.
History.—s. 9, ch. 3724, 1887; RS 620; GS 828; RGS 1575; CGL 2423; s. 841, ch. 95-147.
137.09 Justification and approval of bonds.—Each surety upon every bond of any county officer shall make affidavit that he or she is a resident of the county for which the officer is to be commissioned, and that he or she has sufficient visible property therein unencumbered and not exempt from sale under legal process to make good his or her bond. Every such bond shall be approved by the board of county commissioners when the board is satisfied in its judgment that the bond is legal, sufficient, and proper to be approved.
History.—s. 10, ch. 3724, 1887; RS 621; GS 829; RGS 1576; CGL 2424; ss. 12, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 842, ch. 95-147; s. 148, ch. 2003-261; s. 4, ch. 2016-132.
137.10 Provisions not applicable to surety companies.—The provisions of this chapter requiring two sureties and justification by surety shall not apply where such surety is a surety company authorized to do business in this state.
History.—s. 1, ch. 5372, 1905; GS 830; RGS 1577; CGL 2425.

F.S. 137 on Google Scholar

F.S. 137 on Casetext

Amendments to 137


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 137
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 137.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 137

Total Results: 20

Mario Zequeira v. MMPB Group, LLC, Etc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-09-25T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: Grove Isle Ass’n, Inc. v. Grove Isle Assocs., LLLP, 137 So. 3d 1081, 1089 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014). In reviewing

Glenn Brosnan v. State Farm Florida Insurance Company and Lucille V. Brosnan

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-08-20T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: Loud Voice from the Empty Chair, 44 Md. L. Rev. 137, 139 (1985). That principle extended to the nonproduction

Glenn Brosnan v. State Farm Florida Insurance Company and Lucille V. Brosnan

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-08-20T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: Loud Voice from the Empty Chair, 44 Md. L. Rev. 137, 139 (1985). That principle extended to the nonproduction

Glenn Brosnan v. State Farm Florida Insurance Company and Lucille V. Brosnan

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-08-20T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: Loud Voice from the Empty Chair, 44 Md. L. Rev. 137, 139 (1985). That principle extended to the nonproduction

Karla Pacheco v. Waldo Acebo, M.D., P.A., etc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-08-07T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: Isle Ass'n, Inc. v. Grove Isle Assocs., LLLP, 137 So. 3d 1081, 1089 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014). 1 Chapter

Sharon L. Orr v. AT&T Mobility LLC

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-07-31T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: Isle Ass'n, Inc. v. Grove Isle Assocs., LLLP, 137 So. 3d 1081, 1089 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014)). On

Burger King and Seven Restaurants, LLC v. Richard L. Tulecki, Jr.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-07-31T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: operation. Pembroke Lakes Mall Ltd. v. McGruder, 137 So. 3d 418, 424–26 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014). Absent actual

Rauniel Quintero v. The State of Florida

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-07-31T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: witnesses.’”) (quoting Nixon v. State, 2 So. 3d 137, 141 (Fla. 2009)). Affirmed.

The State of Florida v. Ronald Lee Miller

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-07-17T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: A.R. Douglass, Inc. v. McRainey, 102 Fla. 1141, 137 So. 157, 159 (1931)). There we said that “[

Poky Management, LLC v. Solutrean Investment Group, LLC, A Florida Limited Liability Company and Criminal Defense League Processing, LLC, A Florida Limited Liability Company

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-07-12T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: Dep't of Child. & Fams., 189 So. 3d 134, 137 (Fla. 2016); Mills v. Martinez, 909 So. 2d 340, 342

Combined Services, Inc. v. City of Opa-Locka

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-07-03T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: cause of action.” Sanford v. Rubin, 237 So. 2d 134, 137 (Fla. 1970). Importantly, we exercise our “discretion

Realeza Motors, Inc. v. Norviel Alvarez

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-06-26T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: Mer Ests., Inc. v. Bank of New York Mellon Corp., 137 So. 3d 396, 401 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014) (en banc) (quotation

Publix Super Markets, Inc. v. Joseph Safonte

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-06-20T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: condition.” Pembroke Lakes Mall Ltd. v. McGruder, 137 So. 3d 418, 431 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014). “[A] breach …performed negligently.” Id.; see also Pembroke Lakes, 137 So. 3d at 430 (“When an owner owes a non-delegable

STATE OF FLORIDA v. BRYAN ALLEN REPPLE

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-06-14T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: his official duty.”); Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137, 170 (1803) (“If one of the heads of departments

GEORGE v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-06-07T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: with any record evidence, citing Gomez v. State, 137 So. 3d 1037, 1038 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014) ("[A] defendant

Randy Mcllenan, Kayla Mcllenan, and Charles Williams v. Cypress Chase North Condominium No. 4 Association, Inc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-06-05T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: original) (quoting A.R. Douglass, Inc. v. McRainey, 137 So. 157, 159 (Fla. 1931)). The statute does not provide

Carlos Batista, etc. v. Ramiro A. Rodriguez, etc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-05-22T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: Grove Isle Ass’n, Inc. v. Grove Isle Assocs., LLLP, 137 So. 3d 1081, 1089 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014). A. Conversion

Hutley v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-05-20T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: ____________ No. 1D2023-0137 _____________________________ … 2 2023-0137 District Court of Appeal of Florida fladistctapp

City of Miami Beach v. Victor Guyton

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-05-15T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: Yampol v. Turnberry Isle S. Condo. Ass’n, Inc., 137 So. 3d 1124, 1125 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014) (quashing trial

PARKS v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-05-15T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: believed his testimony), and Tyler v. State, 793 So. 2d 137, 141 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) ("Where counsel incorrectly