Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 161.161 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 161.161 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 161.161

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XI
COUNTY ORGANIZATION AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS
Chapter 161
BEACH AND SHORE PRESERVATION
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 161.161
161.161 Procedure for approval of projects.—
(1) The department shall develop and maintain a comprehensive long-term beach management plan for the restoration and maintenance of the state’s critically eroded beaches fronting the Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, and Straits of Florida. In developing and maintaining this plan, the department shall:
(a) Address long-term solutions to the problem of critically eroded beaches in this state.
(b) Evaluate each improved, modified, or altered inlet and determine whether the inlet is a significant cause of beach erosion. With respect to each inlet determined to be a significant cause of beach erosion, the plan shall include the extent to which such inlet causes beach erosion and recommendations to mitigate the erosive impact of the inlet, including, but not limited to, inlet sediment bypassing; improvement of infrastructure to facilitate sand bypassing; modifications to channel dredging, jetty design, and disposal of spoil material; establishment of feeder beaches; and beach restoration and beach nourishment.
(c) Evaluate criteria for beach restoration and beach nourishment projects, including, but not limited to, dune elevation and width and revegetation and stabilization requirements and beach profiles.
(d) Consider the establishment of regional sediment management alternatives for one or more individual beach and inlet sand bypassing projects as an alternative to beach restoration when appropriate and cost-effective, and recommend the location of such regional sediment management alternatives and the source of beach-compatible sand.
(e) Identify causes of shoreline erosion and change, determine erosion rates, and maintain an updated list of critically eroded sandy beaches based on data, analyses, and investigations of shoreline conditions.
(f) Assess impacts of development and coastal protection structures on shoreline change and erosion.
(g) Identify short-term and long-term economic costs and benefits of beaches to the state and individual beach communities.
(h) Study dune and vegetation conditions, identify existing beach projects without dune features or with dunes without adequate elevations, and encourage dune restoration and revegetation to be incorporated as part of storm damage recovery projects or future dune maintenance events.
(i) Identify beach areas used by marine turtles and develop strategies for protection of the turtles and their nests and nesting locations.
(j) Identify alternative management responses to preserve undeveloped beach and dune systems and to restore damaged beach and dune systems. In identifying such management responses, the department shall consider, at a minimum, beach restoration and nourishment, armoring, relocation, dune and vegetation restoration, and acquisition.
(k) Document procedures and policies for preparing poststorm damage assessments and corresponding recovery plans, including repair cost estimates.
(l) Identify and assess appropriate management measures for all of the state’s critically eroded sandy beaches.
(2) The comprehensive long-term management plan developed and maintained by the department pursuant to subsection (1) must include, at a minimum, a strategic beach management plan, a critically eroded beaches report, and a statewide long-range budget plan. The long-range budget plan must include a 3-year work plan for beach restoration, beach nourishment, and inlet management projects that lists planned projects for each of the 3 fiscal years addressed in the work plan.
(a) The strategic beach management plan must identify and recommend appropriate measures for all of the state’s critically eroded sandy beaches and may incorporate plans prepared at the regional level, taking into account areas of greatest need and probable federal and local funding. Upon approval in accordance with this section, such regional plans, along with the 3-year work plan identified in subparagraph (c)1., must serve as the basis for state funding decisions. Before finalizing the strategic beach management plan, the department shall hold a public meeting in the region for which the plan is prepared or hold a publicly noticed webinar.
(b) The critically eroded beaches report must be developed and maintained based primarily on the requirements specified in paragraph (1)(e).
(c) The statewide long-range budget plan must include at least 5 years of planned beach restoration, beach nourishment, and inlet management project funding needs as identified, and subsequently refined, by local government sponsors. This plan must consist of two components:
1. A 3-year work plan that identifies beach restoration, beach nourishment, and inlet management projects viable for implementation during the next 3 fiscal years, as determined by available cost-sharing, local sponsor support, regulatory considerations, and the ability of the project to proceed as scheduled. The 3-year work plan must, for each fiscal year, identify proposed projects and their current development status, listing them in priority order based on the applicable criteria established in ss. 161.101(14) and 161.143(2). Specific funding requests and criteria ranking, pursuant to ss. 161.101(14) and 161.143(2), may be modified as warranted in each successive fiscal year, and such modifications must be documented and submitted to the Legislature with each 3-year work plan. Year one projects shall consist of those projects identified for funding consideration in the ensuing fiscal year.
2. A long-range plan that identifies projects for inclusion in the fourth and fifth ensuing fiscal years. These projects may be presented by region and do not need to be presented in priority order; however, the department should identify issues that may prevent successful completion of such projects and recommend solutions that would allow the projects to progress into the 3-year work plan.
(3) The secretary shall present the 3-year work plan to the Legislature annually. The work plan must be accompanied by a 3-year financial forecast for the availability of funding for the projects.
(4) Once a project is determined to be undertaken, a survey of all or part of the shoreline within the jurisdiction of the local government in which the beach is located shall be conducted in order to establish the area of beach to be protected by the project and locate an erosion control line. No provision of ss. 161.141-161.211 shall be construed as preventing a local government from participating in the funding of erosion control projects or surveys undertaken in accordance with the provisions of ss. 161.141-161.211. In lieu of conducting a survey, the board of trustees may accept and approve a survey as initiated, conducted, and submitted by the appropriate local government if said survey is made in conformity with the appropriate principles set forth in ss. 161.141-161.211.
(5) Upon completion of the survey depicting the area of the beach erosion control project and the proposed location of the erosion control line, the board of trustees shall give notice of the survey and the date on which the board of trustees will hold a public hearing for the purpose of receiving evidence on the merits of the proposed erosion control line and, if approval is granted, of locating and establishing such requested erosion control line. Such notice shall be by publication in a newspaper of general circulation published in the county or counties in which the proposed beach erosion control project shall be located not less than once a week for 3 consecutive weeks and by mailing copies of such notice by certified or registered mail to each riparian owner of record of upland property lying within 1,000 feet (radial distance) of the shoreline to be extended through construction of the proposed beach erosion control project, as his or her name and address appear upon the latest tax assessment roll, in order that any persons who have an interest in the location of such requested erosion control line can be present at such hearing to submit their views concerning the precise location of the proposed erosion control line. Such notice shall be in addition to any notice requirement in chapter 120.
(6) The board of trustees shall approve or disapprove the erosion control line for a beach restoration project. In locating said line, the board of trustees shall be guided by the existing line of mean high water, bearing in mind the requirements of proper engineering in the beach restoration project, the extent to which erosion or avulsion has occurred, and the need to protect existing ownership of as much upland as is reasonably possible.
(7) In no event shall the department undertake a beach restoration or beach nourishment project where a local share is required without the approval of the local government or governments responsible for that local share.
(8) The department may adopt rules to administer this section.
History.—s. 3, ch. 70-276; s. 1, ch. 70-439; s. 23, ch. 78-95; s. 2, ch. 79-233; s. 9, ch. 86-138; s. 20, ch. 87-97; s. 29, ch. 94-356; s. 1440, ch. 95-147; s. 6, ch. 96-321; s. 3, ch. 96-371; s. 4, ch. 98-311; s. 12, ch. 2000-346; s. 40, ch. 2010-102; s. 4, ch. 2019-122.

F.S. 161.161 on Google Scholar

F.S. 161.161 on Casetext

Amendments to 161.161


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 161.161
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 161.161.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 161.161

Total Results: 20

J. K. v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-12-04

Snippet: was required. See Canady v. State, 813 So. 2d 161, 161 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) ("An individual who is

Thourtman v. Junior

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-06-12

Citation: 275 So. 3d 726

Snippet: before us. See, e.g., Mathis v. Starr, 152 So. 2d 161, 161 (Fla. 1963) ; State ex rel. Freeman v. Kelly,

Thourtman v. Junior

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-06-12

Citation: 275 So. 3d 726

Snippet: before us. See, e.g., Mathis v. Starr, 152 So. 2d 161, 161 (Fla. 1963) ; State ex rel. Freeman v. Kelly,

Mary Grace Vinson v. Tommy Junior Vinson

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-01-07

Snippet: 1st DCA 2017) (Mem.); Byers v. Byers, 149 So. 3d 161, 161– 62 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014); Furr v. Furr, 57 So.

Mary Grace Vinson v. Tommy Junior Vinson

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-11-07

Snippet: 1st DCA 2017) (Mem.); Byers v. Byers, 149 So. 3d 161, 161– 62 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014); Furr v. Furr, 57 So.

Scott A. Brock, Former Husband v. Carolyn Ann Brock, Former Wife

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-10-11

Citation: 229 So. 3d 425

Snippet: were' expressly waived. Byers v. Byers, 149 So.3d 161, 161-62 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014); Furr v. Furr, 57 So.3d

A.D.P. v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-07-14

Citation: 223 So. 3d 428, 2017 WL 2988792, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 10101

Snippet: theft of the vehicle. Canady v. State, 813 So.2d 161, 161 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); A.J.R. v. State, 726 So.2d

A.D.P. v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-07-14

Snippet: theft of the vehicle. Canady v. State, 813 So. 2d 161, 161 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); A.J.R. v. State, 726 So.

Miguel Angel Alfonso-Roche v. State of Florida

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-06-01

Citation: 199 So. 3d 941, 2016 WL 3065576, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 8352

Snippet: after it was stolen); Canady v. State, 813 So.2d 161, 161 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) (reversing conviction because

Board of Trustees v. Walton County

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2013-09-23

Citation: 121 So. 3d 1166, 2013 WL 5302580, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 15067

Snippet: alleging that sections 161.141, 161.191, and 161.161, Florida Statutes (2004), are unconstitutional

Martinez v. Ascensores Servas, S.A.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2012-04-18

Citation: 89 So. 3d 956, 2012 WL 1314377, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 5921

Snippet: Aircraft Servs., Inc. v. EC Tech., Inc., 911 So.2d 161, 161 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (holding because plaintiff

Donovan v. Okaloosa County

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2012-01-05

Citation: 82 So. 3d 801, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 6, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 20, 2012 WL 16587

Snippet: nourishment projects, as *811approved pursuant to s. 161.161, are in the public interest.... § 161.088, Fla

Walton County v. Stop Beach Renourishment

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2008-09-29

Citation: 998 So. 2d 1102, 2008 WL 4381126

Snippet: 161.141. After the MHWL is established, section 161.161(3) provides that the Board must determine the area

Old Port Cove Holdings, Inc. v. CONDO. ASS'N ONE, INC.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2008-07-10

Citation: 986 So. 2d 1279, 33 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 478, 2008 Fla. LEXIS 1238, 2008 WL 2678578

Snippet: Estate of Johnson v. Carr, 286 Ark. 369, 691 S.W.2d 161, 161 (1985); Strong v. Theis, 187 Cal.App.3d 913, 232

Save Our Beaches, Inc. v. Florida Department of Environmental Protection

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2006-07-03

Citation: 27 So. 3d 48, 2006 WL 1112700

Snippet: 141, Fla. Stat. (2005) (emphasis added). Section 161.161(3) provides that “[o]nce a project is determined

South Lake Worth Inlet Dist. v. Ocean Ridge

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1994-02-23

Citation: 633 So. 2d 79

Snippet: that the Division pursue funding under section 161.161 for restoration and maintenance in Ocean Ridge

Sexton, Inc. v. City of Vero Beach

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1990-01-17

Citation: 555 So. 2d 444, 1990 WL 2691

Snippet: on the basis of the procedures set forth in s. 161.161, provided the project is approved by the department

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1989-03-29

Snippet: preservation authority for the state.3 Section 161.161, F.S., sets forth the procedure for approval of

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1979-08-10

Snippet: control line was duly established as required by s. 161.161. Section 161.191(1) vests title to all land seaward

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1974-04-16

Snippet: must establish an "erosion control line." Section 161.161. This line is defined as the line marking the landward