Notes of Decisions
Coastal Dev. of North Florida, Inc. v. City of Jacksonville Beach, 788 So. 2d 204 (Fla. 2001).
· cites it 10× “states: The proposed amendment does not involve a text change to the goals, policies, and objectives of the local government's comprehensive plan, but only proposes a land use change to the future land use map for a site-specific small scale development activity.”
Nassau Cnty. v. Willis, 41 So. 3d 270 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010).
· cites it 8× “" § 163.3177(6)(a), Fla. Stat. (2009). The comprehensive plan must also include "[a] conservation element for the conservation, use, and protection of natural resources in the area, including air, water, water recharge areas, wetlands, waterwells, estuarine marshes, soils,…”
Martin Cnty. v. Yusem, 690 So. 2d 1288 (Fla. 1997).
· cites it 8× “See § 163.3177, Fla. Stat. (1989). With reference to this element, we have noted: [T]he future land use plan element of the local plan must contain both a future land use map and goals, policies, and measurable objectives to guide future land use decisions.”
Snyder v. Bd. of Cnty. Com'rs, 595 So. 2d 65 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991).
· cites it 9× “[4] § 163.3177(5), Fla. Stat. [5] Apparently someone did not understand that the initial recommendation of the P & ZD staff to the Planning and Zoning Board was based on an assumption or assertion that the property in question was within the 100 year flood plain and that the P &…”
Wildlife Fed'n v. Collier Cnty., 819 So. 2d 200 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).
· cites it 22× “Moreover, because buildings and structures are incompatible with the agricultural use of land, there is no corresponding necessity for imposing an intensity standard on a land use designated agricultural within the NRPAs.”
Bd. of Cty. Com'rs of Brevard v. Snyder, 627 So. 2d 469 (Fla. 1993).
· cites it 4× “Section 163.3177(1), Fla. Stat. (1991). At the minimum, the local plan must include elements covering future land use; capital improvements generally; sanitary sewer, solid waste, drainage, potable water, and natural ground water aquifer protection specifically; conservation;…”
DR Horton, Inc.-Jacksonville v. Peyton, 959 So. 2d 390 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007).
· cites it 8× “3177(2), including "a capital improvement element designed to consider the need for and the location of public facilities in order to encourage the efficient utilization of such facilities.”
Glisson v. Alachua Cnty., 558 So. 2d 1030 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990).
· cites it 4× “" § 163.3177(6)(a), Fla. Stat. (1987). The record in this case reflects that since adoption of CPA-5-87 and Ordinance 88-11, no individual appellant-landowner has applied for or been denied a development proposal, rezoning request, or variance from the development regulations.”
Payne v. City of Miami, 52 So. 3d 707 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010).
· cites it 6× “2d at 207-08 (footnotes omitted); see also § 163.3177, Fla. Stat. (2006) (delineating the mandatory and optional elements of comprehensive plans).”
MacHado v. Musgrove, 519 So. 2d 629 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988).
· cites it 2× “Section 163.3177(6), Florida Statutes (1985), requires that the future land use map designate the exact location and extent of all proposed commercial uses.”
Palm Beach Cnty. v. Wright, 641 So. 2d 50 (Fla. 1994).
· cites it 6× “007(3)(b)(4) and (c)(4), promulgated by the Department of Community Affairs and approved by the legislature in section 163.3177(10), Florida Statutes (1991), to place measures in the comprehensive plan to protect existing and future rights-of-way from building encroachments and…”
— 163.3177(1) — 8 cases
Martin Cnty. v. Yusem, 690 So. 2d 1288 (Fla. 1997).
“See § 163.3177, Fla. Stat. (1989). With reference to this element, we have noted: [T]he future land use plan element of the local plan must contain both a future land use map and goals, policies, and measurable objectives to guide future land use decisions.”
Bd. of Cty. Com'rs of Brevard v. Snyder, 627 So. 2d 469 (Fla. 1993).
“Section 163.3177(1), Fla. Stat. (1991). At the minimum, the local plan must include elements covering future land use; capital improvements generally; sanitary sewer, solid waste, drainage, potable water, and natural ground water aquifer protection specifically; conservation;…”
DR Horton, Inc.-Jacksonville v. Peyton, 959 So. 2d 390 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007).
“3177(2), including "a capital improvement element designed to consider the need for and the location of public facilities in order to encourage the efficient utilization of such facilities.”
— 163.3177(1)(f) — 1 case
— 163.3177(10) — 1 case
Palm Beach Cnty. v. Wright, 641 So. 2d 50 (Fla. 1994).
“007(3)(b)(4) and (c)(4), promulgated by the Department of Community Affairs and approved by the legislature in section 163.3177(10), Florida Statutes (1991), to place measures in the comprehensive plan to protect existing and future rights-of-way from building encroachments and…”
— 163.3177(10)(a) — 1 case
— 163.3177(10)(e) — 3 cases
— 163.3177(10)(h) — 3 cases
DR Horton, Inc.-Jacksonville v. Peyton, 959 So. 2d 390 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007).
“3177(2), including "a capital improvement element designed to consider the need for and the location of public facilities in order to encourage the efficient utilization of such facilities.”
Palm Beach Cnty. v. Wright, 641 So. 2d 50 (Fla. 1994).
“007(3)(b)(4) and (c)(4), promulgated by the Department of Community Affairs and approved by the legislature in section 163.3177(10), Florida Statutes (1991), to place measures in the comprehensive plan to protect existing and future rights-of-way from building encroachments and…”
— 163.3177(10)(k) — 1 case
— 163.3177(12) — 1 case
— 163.3177(12)(i) — 1 case
— 163.3177(2) — 6 cases
Coastal Dev. of North Florida, Inc. v. City of Jacksonville Beach, 788 So. 2d 204 (Fla. 2001).
“states: The proposed amendment does not involve a text change to the goals, policies, and objectives of the local government's comprehensive plan, but only proposes a land use change to the future land use map for a site-specific small scale development activity.”
DR Horton, Inc.-Jacksonville v. Peyton, 959 So. 2d 390 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007).
“3177(2), including "a capital improvement element designed to consider the need for and the location of public facilities in order to encourage the efficient utilization of such facilities.”
Payne v. City of Miami, 52 So. 3d 707 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010).
“2d at 207-08 (footnotes omitted); see also § 163.3177, Fla. Stat. (2006) (delineating the mandatory and optional elements of comprehensive plans).”
— 163.3177(3)(a) — 1 case
DR Horton, Inc.-Jacksonville v. Peyton, 959 So. 2d 390 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007).
“3177(2), including "a capital improvement element designed to consider the need for and the location of public facilities in order to encourage the efficient utilization of such facilities.”
— 163.3177(3)(a)(1) — 1 case
DR Horton, Inc.-Jacksonville v. Peyton, 959 So. 2d 390 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007).
“3177(2), including "a capital improvement element designed to consider the need for and the location of public facilities in order to encourage the efficient utilization of such facilities.”
— 163.3177(3)(a)(5) — 1 case
DR Horton, Inc.-Jacksonville v. Peyton, 959 So. 2d 390 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007).
“3177(2), including "a capital improvement element designed to consider the need for and the location of public facilities in order to encourage the efficient utilization of such facilities.”
— 163.3177(3)(b)(1) — 1 case
DR Horton, Inc.-Jacksonville v. Peyton, 959 So. 2d 390 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007).
“3177(2), including "a capital improvement element designed to consider the need for and the location of public facilities in order to encourage the efficient utilization of such facilities.”
— 163.3177(5) — 1 case
Snyder v. Bd. of Cnty. Com'rs, 595 So. 2d 65 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991).
“[4] § 163.3177(5), Fla. Stat. [5] Apparently someone did not understand that the initial recommendation of the P & ZD staff to the Planning and Zoning Board was based on an assumption or assertion that the property in question was within the 100 year flood plain and that the P &…”
— 163.3177(6) — 7 cases
MacHado v. Musgrove, 519 So. 2d 629 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988).
“Section 163.3177(6), Florida Statutes (1985), requires that the future land use map designate the exact location and extent of all proposed commercial uses.”
Coastal Dev. of North Florida, Inc. v. City of Jacksonville Beach, 788 So. 2d 204 (Fla. 2001).
“states: The proposed amendment does not involve a text change to the goals, policies, and objectives of the local government's comprehensive plan, but only proposes a land use change to the future land use map for a site-specific small scale development activity.”
Bd. of Cty. Com'rs of Brevard v. Snyder, 627 So. 2d 469 (Fla. 1993).
“Section 163.3177(1), Fla. Stat. (1991). At the minimum, the local plan must include elements covering future land use; capital improvements generally; sanitary sewer, solid waste, drainage, potable water, and natural ground water aquifer protection specifically; conservation;…”
Payne v. City of Miami, 52 So. 3d 707 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010).
“2d at 207-08 (footnotes omitted); see also § 163.3177, Fla. Stat. (2006) (delineating the mandatory and optional elements of comprehensive plans).”
— 163.3177(6)(a) — 18 cases
Wildlife Fed'n v. Collier Cnty., 819 So. 2d 200 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).
“Moreover, because buildings and structures are incompatible with the agricultural use of land, there is no corresponding necessity for imposing an intensity standard on a land use designated agricultural within the NRPAs.”
Snyder v. Bd. of Cnty. Com'rs, 595 So. 2d 65 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991).
“[4] § 163.3177(5), Fla. Stat. [5] Apparently someone did not understand that the initial recommendation of the P & ZD staff to the Planning and Zoning Board was based on an assumption or assertion that the property in question was within the 100 year flood plain and that the P &…”
Coastal Dev. of North Florida, Inc. v. City of Jacksonville Beach, 788 So. 2d 204 (Fla. 2001).
“states: The proposed amendment does not involve a text change to the goals, policies, and objectives of the local government's comprehensive plan, but only proposes a land use change to the future land use map for a site-specific small scale development activity.”
Nassau Cnty. v. Willis, 41 So. 3d 270 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010).
“" § 163.3177(6)(a), Fla. Stat. (2009). The comprehensive plan must also include "[a] conservation element for the conservation, use, and protection of natural resources in the area, including air, water, water recharge areas, wetlands, waterwells, estuarine marshes, soils,…”
Martin Cnty. v. Yusem, 690 So. 2d 1288 (Fla. 1997).
“See § 163.3177, Fla. Stat. (1989). With reference to this element, we have noted: [T]he future land use plan element of the local plan must contain both a future land use map and goals, policies, and measurable objectives to guide future land use decisions.”
— 163.3177(6)(b) — 2 cases
Palm Beach Cnty. v. Wright, 641 So. 2d 50 (Fla. 1994).
“007(3)(b)(4) and (c)(4), promulgated by the Department of Community Affairs and approved by the legislature in section 163.3177(10), Florida Statutes (1991), to place measures in the comprehensive plan to protect existing and future rights-of-way from building encroachments and…”
— 163.3177(6)(c) — 1 case
— 163.3177(6)(d) — 6 cases
Nassau Cnty. v. Willis, 41 So. 3d 270 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010).
“" § 163.3177(6)(a), Fla. Stat. (2009). The comprehensive plan must also include "[a] conservation element for the conservation, use, and protection of natural resources in the area, including air, water, water recharge areas, wetlands, waterwells, estuarine marshes, soils,…”
Glisson v. Alachua Cnty., 558 So. 2d 1030 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990).
“" § 163.3177(6)(a), Fla. Stat. (1987). The record in this case reflects that since adoption of CPA-5-87 and Ordinance 88-11, no individual appellant-landowner has applied for or been denied a development proposal, rezoning request, or variance from the development regulations.”
— 163.3177(6)(f) — 1 case
— 163.3177(6)(g) — 1 case
— 163.3177(6)(h) — 2 cases
— 163.3177(6)(h)(1)(a) — 1 case
— 163.3177(6)(h)(4)(a) — 1 case
— 163.3177(8) — 4 cases
— 163.3177(9) — 1 case
— 163.3177(d) — 1 case
— 163.3177(l)(a) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.