Florida Statute 163.3194 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XI
COUNTY ORGANIZATION AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS

Chapter 163
INTERGOVERNMENTAL PROGRAMS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 163.3194

163.3194 Legal status of comprehensive plan.—

(1)(a) After a comprehensive plan, or element or portion thereof, has been adopted in conformity with this act, all development undertaken by, and all actions taken in regard to development orders by, governmental agencies in regard to land covered by such plan or element shall be consistent with such plan or element as adopted.

(b) All land development regulations enacted or amended shall be consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan, or element or portion thereof, and any land development regulations existing at the time of adoption which are not consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan, or element or portion thereof, shall be amended so as to be consistent. If a local government allows an existing land development regulation which is inconsistent with the most recently adopted comprehensive plan, or element or portion thereof, to remain in effect, the local government shall adopt a schedule for bringing the land development regulation into conformity with the provisions of the most recently adopted comprehensive plan, or element or portion thereof. During the interim period when the provisions of the most recently adopted comprehensive plan, or element or portion thereof, and the land development regulations are inconsistent, the provisions of the most recently adopted comprehensive plan, or element or portion thereof, shall govern any action taken in regard to an application for a development order.

(2) After a comprehensive plan for the area, or element or portion thereof, is adopted by the governing body, no land development regulation, land development code, or amendment thereto shall be adopted by the governing body until such regulation, code, or amendment has been referred either to the local planning agency or to a separate land development regulation commission created pursuant to local ordinance, or to both, for review and recommendation as to the relationship of such proposal to the adopted comprehensive plan, or element or portion thereof. Said recommendation shall be made within a reasonable time, but no later than within 2 months after the time of reference. If a recommendation is not made within the time provided, then the governing body may act on the adoption.

(3)(a) A development order or land development regulation shall be consistent with the comprehensive plan if the land uses, densities or intensities, and other aspects of development permitted by such order or regulation are compatible with and further the objectives, policies, land uses, and densities or intensities in the comprehensive plan and if it meets all other criteria enumerated by the local government.

(b) A development approved or undertaken by a local government shall be consistent with the comprehensive plan if the land uses, densities or intensities, capacity or size, timing, and other aspects of the development are compatible with and further the objectives, policies, land uses, and densities or intensities in the comprehensive plan and if it meets all other criteria enumerated by the local government.

(4)(a) A court, in reviewing local governmental action or development regulations under this act, may consider, among other things, the reasonableness of the comprehensive plan, or element or elements thereof, relating to the issue justiciably raised or the appropriateness and completeness of the comprehensive plan, or element or elements thereof, in relation to the governmental action or development regulation under consideration. The court may consider the relationship of the comprehensive plan, or element or elements thereof, to the governmental action taken or the development regulation involved in litigation, but private property shall not be taken without due process of law and the payment of just compensation.

(b) It is the intent of this act that the comprehensive plan set general guidelines and principles concerning its purposes and contents and that this act shall be construed broadly to accomplish its stated purposes and objectives.

(5) The tax-exempt status of lands classified as agricultural under s. 193.461 shall not be affected by any comprehensive plan adopted under this act as long as the land meets the criteria set forth in s. 193.461.

(6) If a proposed solid waste management facility is permitted by the Department of Environmental Protection to receive materials from the construction or demolition of a road or other transportation facility, a local government may not deny an application for a development approval for a requested land use that would accommodate such a facility, provided the local government previously approved a land use classification change to a local comprehensive plan or approved a rezoning to a category allowing such land use on the parcel, and the requested land use was disclosed during the previous comprehensive plan or rezoning hearing as being an express purpose of the land use changes.

History.—s. 12, ch. 75-257; s. 1, ch. 77-174; s. 2, ch. 77-223; s. 12, ch. 80-358; s. 69, ch. 81-259; s. 11, ch. 85-55; s. 33, ch. 2002-296.

F.S. 163.3194 on Google Scholar

F.S. 163.3194 on CourtListener

Amendments to 163.3194

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 163.3194

Total Results: 77

Elling O. Eide v. Sarasota County, a Political Subdivision of the State of Florida

908 F.2d 716, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 13424, 1990 WL 102333

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 8, 1990 | Docket: 826119

Cited 129 times | Published

agency must be consistent with the plan. Fla.Stat. § 163.3194 (Supp.1989). On June 30, 1981, Sarasota County

BD. OF CTY. COM'RS OF BREVARD v. Snyder

627 So. 2d 469, 1993 WL 391610

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 7, 1993 | Docket: 1752944

Cited 93 times | Published

with the adopted local plan. Id., § 163.3194(1)(a). Section 163.3194(3), Florida Statutes (1991), explains

Southwest Ranches Homeowners Ass'n v. Broward County

502 So. 2d 931, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 357

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 14, 1987 | Docket: 1657789

Cited 31 times | Published

is required to be "consistent" with the plan. § 163.3194(1). Initially, we reject the County's assertion

CIT. GROWTH MGT. COALITION v. City of West Palm Beach, Inc.

450 So. 2d 204, 1984 Fla. LEXIS 2724

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 8, 1984 | Docket: 1434115

Cited 21 times | Published

by using the phrase "justiciably raised" in section 163.3194(3)(a), which provides in part: A court, in

Snyder v. BOARD OF COUNTY COM'RS

595 So. 2d 65, 1991 WL 259950

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 12, 1991 | Docket: 1299524

Cited 20 times | Published

county Comprehensive Zoning Plan as required by section 163.3194(1)(a), Florida Statutes, and that its denial

City of Jacksonville Beach v. Grubbs

461 So. 2d 160, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2516, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16399

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 3, 1984 | Docket: 1514628

Cited 18 times | Published

WIGGINTON, JJ., concur. *164 NOTES [1] Fla. Stat. § 163.3194(1) provides in pertinent part: After a comprehensive

Dixon v. City of Jacksonville

774 So. 2d 763, 2000 WL 1742050

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 28, 2000 | Docket: 1698127

Cited 17 times | Published

, as provided in its comprehensive plan. See § 163.3194(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (1999). Appellants claimed

Pinecrest Lakes, Inc. v. Shidel

795 So. 2d 191, 2001 WL 1130885

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 26, 2001 | Docket: 462204

Cited 15 times | Published

necessarily presume none was intended.[10] Section 163.3194 requires that all development conform to the

Battaglia Fruit Co. v. City of Maitland

530 So. 2d 940, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1733, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3174, 1988 WL 73928

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 21, 1988 | Docket: 1267913

Cited 15 times | Published

procedures to change the plan have been followed. § 163.3194(1)(a); 1 Florida Real Property Practice Service

Norwood-Norland Homeowners v. DADE CTY.

511 So. 2d 1009, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1281

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 20, 1987 | Docket: 1700915

Cited 15 times | Published

definition of "consistency" is contained in section 163.3194(3), Florida Statutes, as recently amended

City of Cape Canaveral v. Mosher

467 So. 2d 468, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 996, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13536

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 18, 1985 | Docket: 1275265

Cited 13 times | Published

plan is "consistent" with that plan.[4] *471 Section 163.3194(1), Florida Statutes, defines the legal status

DeSisto College, Inc. v. Town of Howey-In-The-Hills

706 F. Supp. 1479, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1620, 1989 WL 13173

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 23, 1989 | Docket: 1650121

Cited 12 times | Published

in any zoning decision pursuant to Fla.Stat. § 163.3194. Similarly, defendants argue that Howey's Comprehensive

Citrus County v. Halls River Development, Inc.

8 So. 3d 413, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2273, 2009 WL 722053

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 20, 2009 | Docket: 1155007

Cited 10 times | Published

development code, the comprehensive plan prevails. See § 163.3194, Fla. Stat. (2005). In 1989, the Board of County

City of Jacksonville v. Wynn

650 So. 2d 182, 1995 WL 49262

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 9, 1995 | Docket: 1048898

Cited 8 times | Published

section 163.3177(2), Florida Statutes,[2] and section 163.3194(4)(a), Florida Statutes. Appellees point to

City of Coconut Creek v. City of Deerfield Beach

840 So. 2d 389, 2003 WL 1239986

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 19, 2003 | Docket: 1463952

Cited 7 times | Published

consistent with the comprehensive plan under section 163.3194(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2001); and that Coconut

Edgewater Beach Owners Ass'n, Inc. v. Walton County

833 So. 2d 215, 2002 WL 31833708

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 2002 | Docket: 1675506

Cited 7 times | Published

Association and the Attorney General cite section 163.3194(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1995), for the proposition

MacHado v. Musgrove

519 So. 2d 629, 1987 WL 494

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 23, 1988 | Docket: 1332286

Cited 7 times | Published

legislature added a definition of consistency at section 163.3194(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1985): A development

Hillsborough County v. Putney

495 So. 2d 224, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1960

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 10, 1986 | Docket: 1758790

Cited 7 times | Published

thereof. Ch. 75-390, § 14(1), Laws of Fla.; see § 163.3194(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1985). In the conservation

Bay Point Club, Inc. v. Bay County

890 So. 2d 256

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 25, 2004 | Docket: 1285978

Cited 6 times | Published

do not expand to include proposed changes. Section 163.3194(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2001), provides:

Save the Homosassa River Alliance, Inc. v. Citrus County

2 So. 3d 329, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 16449, 2008 WL 4681167

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 24, 2008 | Docket: 1138727

Cited 5 times | Published

such plan” must be consistent with that plan. § 163.3194(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2007); see also § 163.3164(7)

Gardens Country Club, Inc. v. PALM BEACH CTY.

590 So. 2d 488, 1991 WL 254555

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 27, 1991 | Docket: 458221

Cited 5 times | Published

denied, 469 So.2d 749 (Fla. 1985). Finally, section 163.3194(1)(b), Florida Statutes (1989), provides,

Gardens Country Club, Inc. v. PALM BEACH CTY.

590 So. 2d 488, 1991 WL 254555

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 27, 1991 | Docket: 458221

Cited 5 times | Published

denied, 469 So.2d 749 (Fla. 1985). Finally, section 163.3194(1)(b), Florida Statutes (1989), provides,

BB McCormick & Sons, Inc. v. City of Jacksonville

559 So. 2d 252, 1990 WL 32984

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 20, 1990 | Docket: 1525109

Cited 5 times | Published

plan to manage future growth and development. Section 163.3194(1)(a) provides: After a comprehensive plan

Elling O. Eide v. Sarasota County, a Political Subdivision of the State of Florida

895 F.2d 1326, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 3305, 1990 WL 14488

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 8, 1990 | Docket: 823955

Cited 5 times | Published

agency must be consistent with the plan. Fla.Stat. § 163.3194 (Supp.1989). On June 30, 1981, Sarasota

Rinker Materials Corp. v. Town of Lake Park

494 So. 2d 1123, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 437

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 21, 1986 | Docket: 452293

Cited 5 times | Published

does not apply to this particular project. Section 163.3194 provides that all development undertaken by

PORPOISE POINT v. St. Johns County

470 So. 2d 850

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 1985 | Docket: 2575609

Cited 5 times | Published

C.J., and DAUKSCH, J., concur. NOTES [1] See § 163.3194(1), Fla. Stat.

Pinellas County v. Ashley

464 So. 2d 176, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 292

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 1, 1985 | Docket: 1192673

Cited 5 times | Published

was in accord with the enabling legislation. § 163.3194, Fla. Stat. (1983). Appellee here, as in Brown

LOVE PGI PARTNERS, LP v. Schultz

706 So. 2d 887, 1998 WL 44481

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 6, 1998 | Docket: 444858

Cited 4 times | Published

pursuant to the statute and the Code. Further, section 163.3194(5) expressly states: The tax exempt status

Hasam Realty Corp. v. Dade County

486 So. 2d 9, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 555, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6633

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 4, 1986 | Docket: 64618387

Cited 4 times | Published

whether such a violation in fact existed, see § 163.3194, Fla.Stat. (1983); Citizens Growth Management

Galaxy Fireworks, Inc. v. City of Orlando

842 So. 2d 160, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2401, 2003 WL 553980

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 28, 2003 | Docket: 1440340

Cited 3 times | Published

development regulation commission for review. § 163.3194(2), Fla. Stat. (2002). This argument turns on

Alexander v. Town of Jupiter

640 So. 2d 79, 1994 WL 178068

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 3, 1994 | Docket: 1371374

Cited 3 times | Published

Island as a conservation land use. Although section 163.3194, Florida Statutes (1979), required that after

International Eateries of America, Inc. v. Board of County Commissioners

838 F. Supp. 580, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16703

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 29, 1993 | Docket: 2108134

Cited 3 times | Published

to sections 163.3164(22) and 163.3194(2). Section 163.3194(2) requires that, after a comprehensive land

Gregory v. City of Alachua

553 So. 2d 206, 1989 WL 128068

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 30, 1989 | Docket: 1259213

Cited 3 times | Published

the development orders were invalid under Section 163.3194, Florida Statutes (1985),[2] because the city

Red-Eyed Jack, Inc. v. City of Daytona Beach

322 F. Supp. 2d 1361, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12223, 2004 WL 1444723

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 1, 2004 | Docket: 2435073

Cited 2 times | Published

criteria enumerated by the local government. § 163.3194(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (2003). At the time of the

Buck Lake Alliance, Inc. v. BD. OF COUNTY COM'RS OF LEON CTY.

765 So. 2d 124, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 7518, 2000 WL 775571

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 19, 2000 | Docket: 1522931

Cited 2 times | Published

compliance with those ordinances. This was error. Section 163.3194(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1997), which is also

Key Biscayne v. Tesaurus Holdings, Inc.

761 So. 2d 397, 2000 WL 561000

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 10, 2000 | Docket: 1709357

Cited 2 times | Published

consistent with such plan or element as adopted." § 163.3194(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1999). The term "development

Franklin County v. SGI LTD.

728 So. 2d 1210, 1999 WL 147376

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 19, 1999 | Docket: 1673866

Cited 2 times | Published

and quash the decision of the circuit court. Section 163.3194(1)(a), Florida Statutes, the Local Government

CITY ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES v. Holmes

677 So. 2d 1327

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 5, 1996 | Docket: 1689893

Cited 2 times | Published

Community Affairs in accordance with Fla. Stat. § 163.3194." It also filed a six-count complaint against

Palm Beach County v. Allen Morris Co.

547 So. 2d 690, 1989 WL 81812

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 26, 1989 | Docket: 1738748

Cited 2 times | Published

it had considered the factors set forth in section 163.3194(4), Florida Statutes (1985) and in this court's

Howell v. Pasco County

165 So. 3d 12, 2015 WL 1381680

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 27, 2015 | Docket: 60248143

Cited 1 times | Published

County had to be in conformance with the plan. See § 163.3194(l)(a). In 1990, Pasco County’s 2025 comprehensive

Graves v. POMPANO BEACH EX REL. CITY COM'N

74 So. 3d 595

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 23, 2011 | Docket: 2358148

Cited 1 times | Published

local government's comprehensive land use plan. § 163.3194(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2009). The Act is to be "construed

Arbor Properties, Inc. v. Lake Jackson Protection Alliance, Inc.

51 So. 3d 502, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 18620, 2010 WL 4967715

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 8, 2010 | Docket: 2406317

Cited 1 times | Published

with the local government's comprehensive plan. § 163.3194(3)(a), Fla. Stat. Appellees filed a complaint

Bay County v. Harrison

13 So. 3d 115, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 6610, 2009 WL 1492652

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 29, 2009 | Docket: 1186910

Cited 1 times | Published

inconsistent with the applicable comprehensive plan. § 163.3194(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2005). An aggrieved party

Schwarz v. City of Treasure Island

521 F. Supp. 2d 1307, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74089, 2007 WL 2908741

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 3, 2007 | Docket: 2452310

Cited 1 times | Published

has adopted a Comprehensive Plan pursuant to Section 163.3194, Florida Statutes, which is implemented via

City of Cocoa Beach v. Vacation Beach, Inc.

876 So. 2d 719, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 9718, 29 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1564

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 2, 2004 | Docket: 1671127

Cited 1 times | Published

amendments on the ground that they violated section 163.3194(2), Florida Statutes, requiring amendments

City of Cocoa Beach v. Vacation Beach, Inc.

852 So. 2d 358, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 12205, 2003 WL 21946462

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 15, 2003 | Docket: 1711023

Cited 1 times | Published

Florida's Growth Management Act, specifically section 163.3194(2), Florida Statutes (2001), which provides

Windward Marina, LLC v. City of Destin

743 So. 2d 635, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 15147, 1999 WL 1037256

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 17, 1999 | Docket: 1670254

Cited 1 times | Published

consistent with such plan or element as adopted. § 163.3194(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1997). The City of Destin

Davis v. St. Joe Paper Co.

652 So. 2d 907, 1995 WL 121496

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 23, 1995 | Docket: 476031

Cited 1 times | Published

consistent with such plan or element as adopted." § 163.3194(1)(a), Fla. Stat. A number of recent decisions

Restigouche, Inc. v. Town of Jupiter

845 F. Supp. 1540, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19568, 1993 WL 603066

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 1993 | Docket: 108745

Cited 1 times | Published

were not land development regulations subject to § 163.3194 and that they were consistent with the Town's

Gilmore v. Hernando County

584 So. 2d 27, 1991 WL 111478

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 27, 1991 | Docket: 466806

Cited 1 times | Published

DCA 1985) (Cowart, J., concurring). [13] Section 163.3194(1)(b), Fla. Stat. (1987). [14] Palm Beach

Samuel A. Osborne v. Walton County, Florida, a Political Subdivision of the State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 12, 2025 | Docket: 69632236

Published

Comprehensive Plan,” the County misstated the law. See § 163.3194(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (“After a comprehensive plan

Judah Imhof, Richard Bullard, Beach To Bay Connection, Inc., and South Walton Community Council, Inc. v. Walton County, Florida, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, and Ashwood Holdings Florida, LLC, a Florida limited liability company

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 15, 2021 | Docket: 60386695

Published

that development, must comport with the plan. § 163.3194(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2018); see Dixon v. City of

LITTLE CLUB CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION v. MARTIN COUNTY

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 21, 2018 | Docket: 8221308

Published

uses, which are part of the comprehensive plan. § 163.3194(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (2016). The land development

Little Club Condo. Ass'n v. Martin Cnty.

259 So. 3d 864

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 21, 2018 | Docket: 64699462

Published

uses, which are part of the comprehensive plan. § 163.3194(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (2016). The land development

Heine v. Lee County

221 So. 3d 1254, 2017 WL 2821553, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 9484

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 30, 2017 | Docket: 6082859

Published

and its development orders. 2 See § 163.3194(l)(a) ("After a comprehensive plan ... has been

Town of Ponce Inlet v. Pacetta, LLC

226 So. 3d 303, 2017 WL 2605150, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 8842

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 16, 2017 | Docket: 6079321

Published

with that plan.” Id. at 421 (quoting § 163.3194(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2005)). Therefore, in

Rainbow River Conservation, Inc. v. Rainbow River Ranch, LLC

189 So. 3d 312, 2016 WL 1465658, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 5768

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 15, 2016 | Docket: 60254475

Published

consistent with that plan.” Id. at 421 (quoting § 163.3194(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2005)). “Citizen enforcement

Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Hendry County

114 So. 3d 1073, 2013 WL 2494708, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 9265

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 12, 2013 | Docket: 60231740

Published

adopted a comprehensive development plan. Section 163.3194(l)(a) provides that once a comprehensive plan

Graves v. City of Pompano Beach ex rel. City Commission

74 So. 3d 595, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 18739

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 23, 2011 | Docket: 60303536

Published

local government’s comprehensive land use plan. § 163.3194(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2009). The Act is to be “construed

1000 Friends of Florida, Inc. v. Palm Beach County

69 So. 3d 1123, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 15755, 2011 WL 4577746

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 5, 2011 | Docket: 2355868

Published

sought to have the development order quashed. § 163.3194(1)(a), Fla. Stat. The trial court entered a final

Keene v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

22 So. 3d 665, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 16130, 2009 WL 3485968

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 30, 2009 | Docket: 1639885

Published

concerning its purposes and contents . . . ." § 163.3194(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (2007) (emphasis added). Therefore

Lake Rosa v. BOARD OF COUNTY COM'RS

911 So. 2d 206, 2005 WL 2318982

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 23, 2005 | Docket: 1501009

Published

permit is a "development order." Finally, section 163.3194(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2001), requires that

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Sep 14, 2004 | Docket: 3255421

Published

conformity with this act." (e.s.) Similarly, section 163.3194(1)(a), Florida Statutes, provides that, after

Mann v. Board of County Commissioners

830 So. 2d 144, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 14285, 2002 WL 31202138

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 4, 2002 | Docket: 64818930

Published

propriety of the adoption of this element. Section 163.3194(l)(a), Florida Statutes, part of the Local

Baker v. Metropolitan Dade County

774 So. 2d 14, 2000 WL 1055505

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 2, 2000 | Docket: 1330566

Published

residentially planned property in violation of section 163.3194(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1999). There simply

City Environmental Services Landfill, Inc. of Florida v. Holmes County

677 So. 2d 1327, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8229, 1996 WL 434328

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 5, 1996 | Docket: 64766551

Published

Community Affairs in accordance with Fla. Stat. § 163.3194.” It also filed a six-count complaint against

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Jul 15, 1996 | Docket: 3256472

Published

allowable residential dwelling units? 2. Is section 163.3194(1)(a) or section 163.3231, Florida Statutes

Santa Rosa County v. Administration Commission, Division of Administrative Hearings

642 So. 2d 618, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8794, 1994 WL 496851

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 14, 1994 | Docket: 64750831

Published

through the evaluation and appraisal report. Section 163.3194 contains a provision on the legal status of

Gilmore v. Hernando County

584 So. 2d 27, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6088

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 27, 1991 | Docket: 64660803

Published

. Section 163.3187, Fla.Stat. (1987). . Section 163.3194(l)(b), Fla.Stat. (1987). . Palm Beach County

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Apr 16, 1991 | Docket: 3255469

Published

municipalities. 7 See, AGO's 86-34 and 85-71. 8 Section 163.3194(1)(a), F.S., providing that "[a]fter a comprehensive

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: May 18, 1989 | Docket: 3255722

Published

Attorney General 1 Section 163.3161(5), F.S. 2 Section 163.3194(1), F.S., which provides for the legal status

Holland v. Walker

492 So. 2d 1093, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1515, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8653

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 1986 | Docket: 64621086

Published

Comprehensive Land Use Act, which provides in section 163.3194(1), Florida Statutes (1981): After a comprehensive

Orange County v. Gardner

477 So. 2d 621, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2172, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15889

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 19, 1985 | Docket: 64614970

Published

its development actions by that master plan. Section 163.3194(1), Florida Statutes (1983) provides: After

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Jul 31, 1985 | Docket: 3258141

Published

adopted in conformity with this act. Section 163.3194, F.S., which establishes the legal status

Pinellas County v. City of Gulfport

458 So. 2d 436, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2427, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16529

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 14, 1984 | Docket: 64607862

Published

and properly adopted comprehensive plan by Section 163.3194, Florida Statutes.” Pinellas County has alleged

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Dec 5, 1980 | Docket: 3257637

Published

becomes effective within the jurisdiction. Section 163.3194(1), F. S., provides that `[a]fter a comprehensive

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Sep 28, 1979 | Docket: 3257365

Published

jurisdictional boundaries of the municipality. Section 163.3194, F. S., which establishes the legal status