Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

You're probably overthinking it. Call a lawyer.

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 177.101 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 177.101 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 177.101 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 177.101

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XII
MUNICIPALITIES
Chapter 177
LAND BOUNDARIES
View Entire Chapter
177.101 Vacation and annulment of plats subdividing land.
(1) Whenever it is discovered, after the plat has been recorded in the public records, that the developer has previously caused the lands embraced in the second plat to be differently subdivided under and by virtue of another plat of the same identical lands, and the first plat was also filed of public record at an earlier date, and no conveyances of lots by reference to the first plat so filed appears of record in such county, the governing body of the county is authorized and directed to and shall, by resolution, vacate and annul the first plat of such lands appearing of record upon the application of the developer of such lands under the first plat or upon application of the owners of all the lots shown and designated upon the second and subsequent plat of such lands, and the circuit court clerk of the county shall thereupon make proper notation of the annulment of such plat upon the face of such annulled plat.
(2) Whenever it is discovered that after the filing of a plat subdividing a parcel of land located in the county, the developer of the lands therein and thereby subdivided did cause such lands embraced in said plat, or a part thereof, to be again and subsequently differently subdivided under another plat of the same and identical lands or a part thereof, which said second plat was also filed at a later date; and it is further made to appear to the governing body of the county that the filing and recording of the second plat would not materially affect the right of convenient access to lots previously conveyed under the first plat, the governing body of the county is authorized by resolution to vacate and annul so much of the first plat of such lands appearing of record as are included in the second plat, upon application of the owners and developer of such lands under the first plat or their successors, grantees, or assignees, and the circuit court clerk of the county shall thereupon make proper notation of the action of the governing body upon the face of the first plat. The approval of a replat by the governing body of a local government, which encompasses lands embraced in all or part of a prior plat filed of public record shall, upon recordation of the replat, automatically and simultaneously vacate and annul all of the prior plat encompassed by the replat.
(3) The governing bodies of the counties of the state may adopt resolutions vacating plats in whole or in part of subdivisions in said counties, returning the property covered by such plats either in whole or in part into acreage. Before such resolution of vacating any plat either in whole or in part shall be entered by the governing body of a county, it must be shown that the persons making application for said vacation own the fee simple title to the whole or that part of the tract covered by the plat sought to be vacated, and it must be further shown that the vacation by the governing body of the county will not affect the ownership or right of convenient access of persons owning other parts of the subdivision.
(4) Persons making application for vacations of plats either in whole or in part shall give notice of their intention to apply to the governing body of the county to vacate said plat by publishing legal notice in a newspaper of general circulation in the county in which the tract or parcel of land is located, in not less than two weekly issues of said paper, and must attach to the petition for vacation the proof of such publication, together with certificates showing that all state and county taxes have been paid. For the purpose of the tax collector’s certification that state, county, and municipal taxes have been paid, the taxes shall be deemed to have been paid if, in addition to any partial payment under s. 194.171, the owner of the platted lands sought to be vacated shall post a cash bond, approved by the tax collector of the county where the land is located and by the Department of Revenue, conditioned to pay the full amount of any judgment entered pursuant to s. 194.192 adverse to the person making partial payment, including all costs, interest, and penalties. The circuit court shall fix the amount of said bond by order, after considering the reasonable timeframe for such litigation and all other relevant factors; and a certified copy of such approval, order, and cash bond shall be attached to the application. If such tract or parcel of land is within the corporate limits of any incorporated city or town, the governing body of the county shall be furnished with a certified copy of a resolution of the town council or city commission, as the case may be, showing that it has already by suitable resolution vacated such plat or subdivision or such part thereof sought to be vacated.
(5) Every such resolution by the governing body shall have the effect of vacating all streets and alleys which have not become highways necessary for use by the traveling public. Such vacation shall not become effective until a certified copy of such resolution has been filed in the offices of the circuit court clerk and duly recorded in the public records of said county.
(6) All resolutions vacating plats by the governing body of a county prior to September 1, 1971, are hereby validated, ratified, and confirmed. Such resolutions shall have the same effect as if the plat had been vacated after September 1, 1971.
History.s. 1, ch. 71-339; s. 1, ch. 79-86; s. 32, ch. 87-224; s. 9, ch. 98-20.

F.S. 177.101 on Google Scholar

F.S. 177.101 on CourtListener

Amendments to 177.101


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 177.101

Total Results: 8  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

Atl. Gulf Communities Corp. v. Tax Collectors of St. Lucie Cnty. (In re Gen. Dev. Corp.), 163 B.R. 216 (S.D. Fla. 1994).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 913

...tion of the undeveloped tracts, and to this end, sought governmental administrative approval of the platting and replatting actions. The governmental authorities, however, denied approval on the basis that the Debtors failed to comply with Fla.Stat. § 177.101(1). That statute requires that applications for actions platting or rep-latting land must include “certificates showing that all state and county taxes have been paid.” Fla.Stat. § 177.101(1) (West Supp....
...dum Decision”). The lower court rejected the Debtors’ arguments and held that 11 U.S.C. § 525 (a) does not permit the Debtors to avoid the requirement of Fla.Stat. § 177.-101(4) to pay outstanding taxes. The lower court reasoned that Fla.Stat. § 177.101(4) applied uniformly to every person or entity seeking to plat or replat land in the State of Florida and that the statute does not discriminate against the Debtors “solely be *219 cause such bankrupt or debtor is or has been a debtor under [the Bankruptcy Code] ...” See Memorandum Decision at 3. This timely appeal followed. 1 Discussion The issues on appeal are (1) whether the application of Fla.Stat. § 177.101(4) to this case violates 11 U.S.C....
...§ 525 (a); and (2) whether the Appellees’ efforts to obtain immediate payment of the outstanding tax obligations violate the provisions in the Confirmation Order and the Reorganization Plan. The lower court’s determination of whether Fla.Stat. § 177.101(4) violates 11 U.S.C....
...95-989, 95th Cong., 2d Sess. 81 (1978), U.S.Code Cong. & Admin.News 1978, pp. 5787, 5867. Section 525(a), by its plain language, applies to the facts of this case. It is clear that the governmental units here are attempting, pursuant to Fla.Stat. § 177.101(4), to condition the approval of the Debtors’ platting and replatting actions on the payment of prepetition tax debts that have been discharged or are dischargeable in bankruptcy. Such action is based solely “on the basis of nonpayment of a debt discharged” or dischargeable in the bankruptcy case, in violation of section 525(a). Thus, as applied to the facts of this case, Fla.Stat. § 177.101(4) has the effect of frustrating section 525(a) and the overriding fresh start principle of bankruptcy law....
...The court below is directed to grant the Appellants’ motion for an order determining that governmental administrative approval of platting and replatting actions on the Debtors’ property conditioned upon the prepayment of tax obligations pursuant to Fla.Stat. § 177.101(4) discriminates against the Debtor in violation of 11 U.S.C....
Copy

Blair Nurseries, Inc. v. Baker Cnty., Florida, A Political etc., 199 So. 3d 534 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 13744, 2016 WL 4751757

right of convenient access” of such persons. § 177.101(3), Fla. *536Stat. (2014) (emphasis added). No
Copy

Balbier v. City of Deerfield Beach, 440 So. 2d 523 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24087

...4th DCA 1982), the trial court on remand determined that appellants had no interest in the property. We affirm, holding they had no compensable interest and that they have failed to persuade this court, as in the trial court, that appellee had abandoned the right-of-way in question. See Section 177.101, Florida Statutes (1981) and Langston v....
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1975).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

QUESTION: May a board of county commissioners adopt an ordinance on its own motion, without an application from the landowner or owners, authorizing the vacation of subdivision plats under s. 177.101 or s. 163.280, F.S., when the vacating of such plat will not affect the ownership or right of convenient access of such owners? SUMMARY: Section 177.101 , F.S., does not empower the board of county commissioners of a nonchartered county to vacate subdivision plats on its own motion....
...163.280, F.S., in certain circumstances and upon certain conditions, but only if the board formally adopts and proceeds in accordance with the requirements of Part II, Ch. 163 , F.S. Attorney General Opinion 072-169 holds that a board of county commissioners (of a nonchartered county) is without authority under s. 177.101 , F.S., to vacate a subdivision plat upon its own motion without an application by the developer of the subdivision or the owners of the lots therein....
Copy

Orange West, Ltd. v. City of Winter Garden, 528 So. 2d 84 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1609, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2910, 1988 WL 68505

...Additionally, the municipality has some powers in the regulation of subdivisions and the imposition of plat requirements, such as the grant or denial of building permits. See Kane Homes, Inc. v. City of North Lauderdale, 418 So.2d 451 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); see also § 177.101, Fla.Stat....
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1976).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

2d 833, 7 A.L.R.3d 602 (Fla. 1963). Thus, section 177.101(4), Florida Statutes, must be construed in
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 2005).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

vacated or annulled.5 Pertinent to your inquiry, section 177.101(3), Florida Statutes, states: "The governing
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1983).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

dedication by plat. 26 C.J.S. Dedication s 60(b). Section 177.101, F.S., provides in subsection (3) that the