Florida Statute 185.19 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XII
MUNICIPALITIES

Chapter 185
MUNICIPAL POLICE PENSIONS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 185.19

185.19 Separation from municipal service; refunds.—For any municipality, chapter plan, local law municipality, or local law plan under this chapter:

(1) If any police officer leaves the service of the municipality before accumulating aggregate time of 10 years toward retirement and before being eligible to retire under the provisions of this chapter, such police officer shall be entitled to a refund of all of his or her contributions made to the municipal police officers’ retirement trust fund without interest, less any benefits paid to him or her.

(2) If any police officer who has been in the service of the municipality for at least 10 years elects to leave his or her accrued contributions, if contributions are required, in the municipal police officers’ retirement trust fund, such police officer upon attaining age 50 years or more may retire at the actuarial equivalent of the amount of such retirement income otherwise payable to him or her, as provided in s. 185.16(4), or, upon attaining age 55 years, may retire as provided in s. 185.16(2).

History.—s. 17, ch. 28230, 1953; s. 6, ch. 59-320; s. 7, ch. 61-85; s. 2, ch. 61-119; s. 949, ch. 95-147; s. 61, ch. 99-1.

F.S. 185.19 on Google Scholar

F.S. 185.19 on Casetext

Amendments to 185.19

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 185.19

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 185.19.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 185.19

Total Results: 14

City of St. Petersburg v. Remia

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-07-16

Citation: 41 So. 3d 322, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 10448, 2010 WL 2788287

Snippet: contributions to the fund. We affirm. Sections 185.19, 185.08, and 185.35, Florida Statutes (2000), are

State v. Powers

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1990-01-05

Citation: 555 So. 2d 888, 1990 WL 783

Snippet: test performances. See Alsop v. Pierce, 155 Fla. 185, 19 So.2d 799 (1944). II. In this case, however, we

Conklin v. Hurley

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1983-03-10

Citation: 428 So. 2d 654

Snippet: 1033 (1977); Witty v. Schramm, 62 Ill. App.3d 185, 19 Ill.Dec. 669, 379 N.E.2d 333 (1978); Jackson v

Variety Children's Hosp., Inc. v. Perkins

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1980-02-05

Citation: 382 So. 2d 331, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16398

Snippet: which they are used. See Alsop v. Pierce, 155 Fla. 185, 19 So.2d 799, 803 (1944). Every case upon which Variety

Department of Revenue v. Markham

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1979-11-05

Citation: 381 So. 2d 1101

Snippet: Police Department in Alsop v. Pierce, 155 Fla. 185, 19 So.2d 799 (1944). The Commission had *1113 passed

State ex rel. Reno v. Barquet

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1978-05-02

Citation: 358 So. 2d 230, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15865

Snippet: So.2d 341 (Fla.1952); Alsop v. Pierce, 155 Fla. 185, 19 So.2d 799 (1944); Shell Oil Company v. State, 295

Edwards v. Lindsley

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1977-09-13

Citation: 349 So. 2d 817, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16581

Snippet: 285 (Fla. 1952). Cf. Alsop v. Pierce, 155 Fla. 185, 19 So.2d 799 (1944). Obviously if the Board is given

City of Opa Locka v. State ex rel. Tepper

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1972-01-25

Citation: 257 So. 2d 100, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 7342

Snippet: considered as a whole. Alsop v. Pierce, 155 Fla. 185, 19 So.2d 799, 802. The provisions should be construed

State Ex Rel. Martin v. Michell

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1966-07-13

Citation: 188 So. 2d 684

Snippet: any other way. Alsop v. Pierce, 1944, 155 Fla. 185, 19 So.2d 799. The assailed subpoena, designed as a

Bailey v. City of Tampa

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1965-05-12

Citation: 175 So. 2d 533, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3168

Snippet: 185.06, 185.07, 185.-14, 185.15, 185.16, 185.18, 185.19, 185.21, F.S.A. See Attorney General Opinion 059-190

Walker v. Pendarvis

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1961-07-14

Citation: 132 So. 2d 186

Snippet: rendered; and Alsop v. Pierce, 1944, 155 Fla. 185, 19 So.2d 799 which was an action for a declaratory

Easterlin v. City of New Port Richey

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1958-07-30

Citation: 105 So. 2d 361, 1958 Fla. LEXIS 1549

Snippet: in any other manner. Alsop v. Pierce, 155 Fla. 185, 19 So.2d 799. These are the reasons that I concurred

Title & Trust Co. of Fla. v. Title Guaranty & Abstract Co. of Sanford

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1958-06-04

Citation: 103 So. 2d 211, 1958 Fla. App. LEXIS 2881

Snippet: city charter, Alsop v. Pierce, 1944, 155 Fla. 185, 19 So.2d 799; authority of church to enter into contract

Overman v. State Board of Control

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1952-12-02

Citation: 62 So. 2d 696

Snippet: judgments statute. In Alsop v. Pierce, 155 Fla. 185, 19 So.2d 799; Watson v. Centro Espanol De Tampa, 158