Florida Statute 189.076 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XIII
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT

Chapter 189
UNIFORM SPECIAL DISTRICT ACCOUNTABILITY ACT

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 189.076

189.076 Financial allocations.—

(1) The government formed by merger of existing special districts shall assume all indebtedness of, and receive title to all property owned by, the preexisting special districts. The proposed charter shall provide for the determination of the proper allocation of the indebtedness so assumed and the manner in which said debt shall be retired.

(2) Unless otherwise provided by law or ordinance, the dissolution of a special district government shall transfer the title to all property owned by the preexisting special district government to the local general-purpose government, which shall also assume all indebtedness of the preexisting special district.

(3) The provisions of this section shall not apply to community development districts established pursuant to chapter 190 or to water management districts created and operated pursuant to chapter 373.

History.—s. 11, ch. 89-169; s. 11, ch. 97-255; s. 25, ch. 2014-22.

Note.—Former s. 189.4045.

F.S. 189.076 on Google Scholar

F.S. 189.076 on Casetext

Amendments to 189.076

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 189.076

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 189.076.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 189.076

Total Results: 18

Haygood v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2013-02-14T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 109 So. 3d 735, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 93, 2013 WL 535412, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 261

Snippet: v. United States, 284 U.S. 390, 393, 52 S.Ct. 189, 76 L.Ed. 356 (1932). A “defendant has no right to

Gsp v. Kb

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2010-03-19T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 30 So. 3d 667

Snippet: Mother's affidavits show that she paid only $189.76 per month for health care expenses through the …supports this claim. Although we note that the $189.76 figure does not include dental insurance premiums… health, dental, and vision insurance costs of $189.76 per month before January 1, 2006, and $265 per

G.S.P. v. K.B.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2010-03-19T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 30 So. 3d 667, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 3612

Snippet: the Mother’s affidavits show that she paid only $189.76 per month for health care expenses through the …supports this claim. Although we note that the $189.76 figure does not include dental insurance premiums… health, dental, and vision insurance costs of $189.76 per month before January 1, 2006, and $265 per

Vickery v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2004-03-18T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 869 So. 2d 623

Snippet: Dunn v. United States, 284 U.S. 390, 52 S.Ct. 189, 76 L.Ed. 356 (1932), the Court explained the concept

Williams v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2001-07-12T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 792 So. 2d 1207

Snippet: Dunn v. United States, 284 U.S. 390, 52 S.Ct. 189, 76 L.Ed. 356 (1932); United States v. Maybury, 274

State v. Connelly

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1999-08-19T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 748 So. 2d 248

Snippet: Dunn v. United States, 284 U.S. 390, 52 S.Ct. 189, 76 L.Ed. 356 (1932). 716 So.2d at 284. The Fifth District

State v. Connelly

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1998-07-02T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 716 So. 2d 283, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 8010, 1998 WL 349549

Snippet: v. United States, 284 U.S. 390, 393, 52 S.Ct. 189, 76 L.Ed. 356 (1932), in which Justice Holmes, writing

State v. Powell

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1995-09-05T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 659 So. 2d 1301, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9318, 1995 WL 518800

Snippet: Dunn v. United States, 284 U.S. 390, 52 S.Ct. 189, 76 L.Ed. 356 (1932). Then, in 1961, the Fifth Circuit

Lleo v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1992-07-02T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 601 So. 2d 1292

Snippet: Dunn v. United States, 284 U.S. 390, 52 S.Ct. 189, 76 L.Ed. 356 (1932); Goodwin v. State, 157 Fla. 751

Bufford v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1985-08-08T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 473 So. 2d 795

Snippet: Dunn v. United States, 284 U.S. 390, 52 S.Ct. 189, 76 L.Ed. 356 (1932), the majority of the Supreme Court

Gonzalez v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1983-11-15T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 440 So. 2d 514

Snippet: Dunn v. United States, 284 U.S. 390, 52 S.Ct. 189, 76 L.Ed. 356 (1932). Such verdicts have included those

Bell v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1983-06-09T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 437 So. 2d 1057

Snippet: Dunn v. United States, 284 U.S. 390, 52 S.Ct. 189, 76 L.Ed. 356 (1932); Streeter v. State, 416 So.2d

Marshall v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1982-11-09T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 421 So. 2d 714, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21658

Snippet: Dunn v. United States, 284 U.S. 390, 52 S.Ct. 189, 76 L.Ed. 356 (1932); McCloud v. State, 335 So.2d 257

Streeter v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1982-07-13T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 416 So. 2d 1203

Snippet: Dunn v. United States, 284 U.S. 390, 52 S.Ct. 189, 76 L.Ed. 356 (1932), a verdict on one count is not

Corbo v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1977-06-14T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 347 So. 2d 133

Snippet: Dunn v. United States, 284 U.S. 390, 52 S.Ct. 189, 76 L.Ed. 356 (1932). Appellant challenges legality

State v. Trafficante

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1961-12-19T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 136 So. 2d 264

Snippet: v. United States, 1932, 284 U.S. 390, 52 S.Ct. 189, 76 L.Ed. 356, 80 A.L.R. 161, that consistency in a

Buchanan v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1959-04-20T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 111 So. 2d 51

Snippet: Dunn v. United States, 284 U.S. 390, 52 S.Ct. 189, 76 L.Ed. 356; Steckler v. United States, 2 Cir., 7

Bowser v. Harder

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1957-11-26T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 98 So. 2d 752

Snippet: Dunn v. United States, 284 U.S. 390, 52 S.Ct. 189, 76 L.Ed. 356." In the case of Higbee v. Dorigo