Florida Statute 190.044 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XIII
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT

Chapter 190
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 190.044

190.044 Exemption of district property from execution.—All district property shall be exempt from levy and sale by virtue of an execution, and no execution or other judicial process shall issue against such property, nor shall any judgment against the district be a charge or lien on its property or revenues; however, nothing contained herein shall apply to or limit the rights of bondholders to pursue any remedy for the enforcement of any lien or pledge given by the district in connection with any of the bonds or obligations of the district.

History.—s. 2, ch. 80-407.

F.S. 190.044 on Google Scholar

F.S. 190.044 on Casetext

Amendments to 190.044

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 190.044

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 190.044.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 190.044

Total Results: 7

Tern Bay Community Development District v. Ryangolf Corporation

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2014-12-31T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 153 So. 3d 964

Snippet: execute its judgment against CDD’s property. Section 190.044 provides that all property owned by a community

Bonfiglio v. BANKER'S TRUST CO. OF CAL.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2006-11-14T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 944 So. 2d 1087

Snippet: foreclosure case, the jury awarded the lender $128,190.44 on its *1088 foreclosure claim and the borrower

Seddon v. Harpster

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1983-09-22T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 438 So. 2d 165

Snippet: ejectment is a nullity. McRae v. Preston, 54 Fla. 190, 44 So. 946 (1907). The purpose of the betterment statute

Boynton v. Harbison

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1961-12-08T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 135 So. 2d 234

Snippet: Richbourg et al. v. Rose, 1907, 53 Fla. 173 at 190, 44 So. 69; Holliday v. McKinne, 1886, 22 Fla. 153;

Haynes v. Woodward

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1944-02-18T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 16 So. 2d 736, 154 Fla. 111

Snippet: affirmed on authority of McRae v. Preston, 54 Fla. 190, 44 So. 946. Affirmed. BUFORD, C. J., CHAPMAN and ADAMS

Wenske v. Salley

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1921-08-15T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 82 Fla. 224, 89 So. 653, 1921 Fla. LEXIS 449

Snippet: , 7 South. Rep. 391; McRae v. Preston, 54 Fla. 190, 44 South. Rep. 946. The Court’s refusal to permit

Gibbs v. McCoy

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1915-11-02T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 70 Fla. 245

Snippet: , 7 South. Rep. 391; McRae v. Preston, 54 Fla. 190, 44 South. Rep. 946; Jones v. Allen, 63 Fla. 204, text