Florida Statute 206.63 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XIV
TAXATION AND FINANCE

Chapter 206
MOTOR AND OTHER FUEL TAXES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 206.63

206.63 Definitions; s. 206.64.—For the purposes of s. 206.64, the following words and terms when used herein shall have the following meanings:

(1) “Agricultural purposes” shall be construed to mean motor fuel used in any tractor, vehicle, or other farm equipment which is used exclusively on a farm or for processing farm products on the farm and no part of which is used in any vehicle or equipment driven or operated upon the public highways of this state. This restriction shall not apply to the movement of farm vehicles or farm equipment between farms. The transporting of bees by water and the operating of equipment used in the apiary of a beekeeper and the practice of aquaculture shall be also deemed agricultural purposes.

(2) “Commercial fishing purposes” shall be construed to mean motor fuel used in the operation of boats, vessels, and equipment used exclusively for the taking of fish, crayfish, oysters, shrimp, and sponges from the salt and fresh waters under the jurisdiction of the state for resale to the public, but shall in no way be construed to include fuel used for sports or pleasure fishing, no part of which is used in any vehicle or equipment driven or operated upon the highways of this state.

History.—s. 1, ch. 28098, 1953; s. 1, ch. 29916, 1955; s. 1, ch. 57-205; s. 7, ch. 63-253; s. 5, ch. 65-371; s. 2, ch. 65-420; ss. 21, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 1, ch. 70-995; s. 3, ch. 87-367.

Note.—Former s. 208.47.

F.S. 206.63 on Google Scholar

F.S. 206.63 on Casetext

Amendments to 206.63

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 206.63

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 206.63.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 206.63

Total Results: 19

Andwele R. Williams v. State of Florida

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-12-04

Snippet: a new charge. Thompson v. State, 66 Fla. 206, 63 So. 423 (1913). There are two lines of

Cox v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2002-05-01

Citation: 816 So. 2d 160, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 5674, 2002 WL 799740

Snippet: court on a new charge. Thompson v. State, 66 Fla. 206, 63 So. 423 (1913). There are two lines of authority

Sinkfield v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1992-01-02

Citation: 592 So. 2d 322, 1992 WL 2026

Snippet: So. 684 (1940) and Thompson v. State, 66 Fla. 206, 63 So. 423 (1913). Miller is unlike the instant case

Miller v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1991-01-23

Citation: 573 So. 2d 405, 1991 WL 6313

Snippet: 196 So. 684 (1940); Thompson v. State, 66 Fla. 206, 63 So. 423 (1913). We hold that Clinton and Thompson

Hlad v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1990-07-19

Citation: 565 So. 2d 762, 1990 WL 98751

Snippet: identity problem, see Thompson v. State, 66 Fla. 206, 63 So. 423 (1913); compare State v. Perrera, 443 So

Smith v. City of St. Petersburg

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1974-10-30

Citation: 302 So. 2d 756

Snippet: Fla. 163, 44 So. 747; Thompson v. State, 66 Fla. 206, 63 So. 423; Butler v. Perry, 67 Fla. 405, 66 So. 150;

Ricks v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1971-01-12

Citation: 242 So. 2d 763

Snippet: and circumstances. Thompson v. State, 66 Fla. 206, 63 So. 423; Benton v. State, 95 Fla. 919, 117 So.2d

City of Ocoee v. Bowness

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1953-04-28

Citation: 65 So. 2d 7, 1953 Fla. LEXIS 1263

Snippet: Fla. 163, 44 So. 747; Thompson v. State, 66 Fla. 206, 63 So. 423; Butler v. Perry, 67 Fla. 405, 66 So. 150;

Gillett v. Colson

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1940-10-08

Citation: 198 So. 109, 144 Fla. 377

Snippet: Fla. 163, 44 So. 747; Thompson v. State, 66 Fla. 206, 63 So. 423; Ex Parte Gilletti, 70 Fla. 442,70 So.

Clinton v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1940-06-11

Citation: 196 So. 684, 143 Fla. 356, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 1207

Snippet: clearly established in Thompson v. State, 66 Fla. 206, 63 South. Rep. 423. From the record it appears that

State Ex Rel. Grodin v. Barns

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1935-05-21

Citation: 161 So. 568, 119 Fla. 405

Snippet: 44 So.2d Rep. 747; Thompson v. State,66 Fla. 206, 63 So.2d Rep. 423; Ex Parte Pricha, 70 Fla. 265, 70

Finch and Stokes v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1934-09-10

Citation: 156 So. 489, 116 Fla. 437, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1079

Snippet: 60, 55 Sou. Rep. 550; Thompson v. State, 66 Fla. 206,63 So.2d 423, Ex parte Pricha, 70 Fla. 265, 70 Sou

Spencer v. Hunt

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1933-03-24

Citation: 147 So. 282, 109 Fla. 248

Snippet: 44 Sou. Rep. 747; Thompson v. State, 66 Fla. 206; 63 Sou. Rep. 423; Butler v. Perry, 67 Fla. 405, 66

State, Ex Rel. Oglesby v. Hand

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1928-12-17

Citation: 119 So. 376, 96 Fla. 799

Snippet: 163, 44 So. R. 747; Thompson v. State, 66 Fla. 206, 63 So. R. 423; ex parte pricha,70 Fla. 265, 70 So

White v. Penton

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1926-10-28

Citation: 110 So. 533, 92 Fla. 837

Snippet: 44 South. Rep. 747; Thompson v. State,66 Fla. 206; 63 South. Rep. 423; Ex parte Pricha, supra. The title

Davis v. Wilson & Toomer Fertilizer Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1922-07-06

Citation: 84 Fla. 102, 92 So. 916

Snippet: 44 South. Rep. 747; Thompson v. State, 66 Fla. 206, 63 South. Rep. 423. And “it must be a plain ease of

Land v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1919-02-22

Citation: 77 Fla. 212, 81 So. 159

Snippet: disposition of the case. Thompson v. State, 66 Fla. 206, 63 South. Rep. 423; Smith v. State, 62 Fla. 91, 57

Ex Parte Pricha

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1915-11-04

Citation: 70 Fla. 265, 70 So. 406

Snippet: 55 South. Rep. 550; Thompson v. State, 66 Fla. 206, 63 South. Rep. 423. As is well said in an instructive

Brooks v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1915-04-20

Citation: 69 Fla. 446, 68 So. 446

Snippet: South. Rep. 348, and Thompson v. State, 66 Fla. 206, 63 South: Rep. 423. The first error assigned is as