Florida Statute 213.50 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XIV
TAXATION AND FINANCE

Chapter 213
STATE REVENUE LAWS: GENERAL PROVISIONS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 213.50

213.50 Failure to comply; revocation of corporate charter or license to operate a public lodging establishment or public food service establishment; refusal to reinstate charter or license.—

(1) Any corporation of this state which has an outstanding tax warrant that has existed for more than 3 consecutive months is subject to the revocation of its charter as provided in s. 607.1420.

(2) A request for reinstatement of a corporate charter may not be granted by the Division of Corporations of the Department of State if an outstanding tax warrant has existed for that corporation for more than 3 consecutive months.

(3)(a) The Division of Hotels and Restaurants of the Department of Business and Professional Regulation may suspend a license to operate a public lodging establishment or a public food service establishment if a tax warrant has been outstanding against the licenseholder for more than 3 months.

(b) The division may deny an application to renew a license to operate a public lodging establishment or a public food service establishment if a tax warrant has been outstanding against the licenseholder for more than 3 months.

History.—s. 23, ch. 92-320; s. 13, ch. 2010-138; s. 5, ch. 2010-166.

F.S. 213.50 on Google Scholar

F.S. 213.50 on Casetext

Amendments to 213.50

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 213.50

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 213.50.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 213.50

Total Results: 4

Florida Board of Bar Examiners re Barnett

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2007-06-14

Citation: 959 So. 2d 234, 32 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 328, 2007 Fla. LEXIS 1049, 2007 WL 1703449

Snippet: $1,535.72 in prejudgment interest, and costs of $213.50, for a total judgment of $5,296.59. In October

Florida Bar v. Kanter

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1970-10-07

Citation: 240 So. 2d 148

Snippet: the costs against respondent in the amount of $213.50. It is so ordered. ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW

Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Campen Bros.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1934-04-02

Citation: 154 So. 131, 114 Fla. 386, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1848

Snippet: during his trip. Adger v. Blue Ridge Ry.,71 S.C. 213, 50 S.E. 783, 110 A. S. R. 568. But if a carrier with

Ex-Parte Wells

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1885-01-15

Citation: 21 Fla. 280

Snippet: ; Hunter vs. Burnsville Turnpike Co., 56 Ind., 213; 50 N. Y., 504; 69 N. Y., 657. “ There has been,” says