The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XVII
MILITARY AFFAIRS AND RELATED MATTERS

Chapter 250
MILITARY AFFAIRS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 250.23

250.23 Pay for state active duty.—

(1) Officers and enlisted personnel of the Florida National Guard, when ordered to state active duty shall receive the pay and allowance prescribed in the applicable pay tables for similar grades and periods of service of personnel in the United States Army or Air Force. All personnel shall be provided subsistence in kind or commutation therefor in the amount prescribed by the Adjutant General.

(2) Enlisted personnel of the Florida National Guard who are ordered to state active duty shall be paid $20 per day in addition to any other compensation provided.

History.—s. 30, ch. 8502, 1921; s. 4, ch. 9337, 1923; s. 3, ch. 12089, 1927; CGL 2042(a); s. 2, ch. 14761, 1931; CGL 1936 Supp. 2042(1); s. 1, ch. 22038, 1943; s. 1, ch. 25112, 1949; s. 1, ch. 81-140; s. 1, ch. 82-92; s. 19, ch. 2003-68.

Note.—Former s. 250.33.

F.S. 250.23 on Google Scholar

F.S. 250.23 on Casetext

Amendments to 250.23

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 250.23

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 250.23.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

In CINTRON, P. R. v., 447 B.R. 82 (Bankr. D.P.R. 2011)

. . . proof of claim # 3-1 as an unsecured nonpriority creditor for services performed which amount to $132, 250.23 . . .

M. CRUZ, CRUZ N. v. ALHAMBRA SCHOOL DISTRICT A. H. Nu L. E. A., 601 F. Supp. 2d 1183 (C.D. Cal. 2009)

. . . $275 $3,841.75 Sharon Terman 54.79 $225 $12,327.75 Anya Lakner 9.22 $200 $1,844 LAS-ELC Paralegals 250.23 . . .

MADISON GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,, 168 F.3d 1337 (D.C. Cir. 1999)

. . . . § 250.23, directing that comments and hearing requests be filed no later than November 5, 1996. . . .

A. RICHARDSON, a v. NATIONAL CITY BANK OF EVANSVILLE,, 141 F.3d 1228 (7th Cir. 1998)

. . . installment agreement provided that Richardson would pay the balance of $12,649.87 in 72 payments of $250.23 . . .

OHIO POWER COMPANY, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, LCP, 954 F.2d 779 (D.C. Cir. 1992)

. . . . § 250.23. Such notice was provided as part of Ohio Power’s applications to the SEC. . . .

ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION, INC. v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,, 895 F.2d 1255 (9th Cir. 1990)

. . . Centerior Energy Corp., HARC No. 35-24073, 35 SEC Docket at 777 (drawing criteria from 17 CFR § 250.23 . . .

In L. REYNOLDS, M., 17 B.R. 489 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 1981)

. . . charge of $3,438.49 calculated at an annual percentage rate of 17.60%, was to be paid over 48 months at $250.23 . . . proposes to pay GMAC a monthly amount essentially equal to that called for in the contract: (i.e., $250.23 . . .

ATKINS, v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, 383 So. 2d 313 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . term is defined in Section 250.27; therefore, he was not entitled to pay from the state under Section 250.23 . . .

TOWN COURT NURSING CENTER, INC. L. v. S. BEAL, A. Jr. COOPER, L. No. A. CALIFANO, Jr. No., 586 F.2d 280 (3d Cir. 1978)

. . . . § 250.23 (1976). . . . . § 250.23(a)(3)(v) (1976) specifically requires that the medical review team inspection include “personal . . .

A. FITZGERALD, v. B. STAATS, 578 F.2d 435 (D.C. Cir. 1978)

. . . On June 19, 1975, the Air Force paid Fitzgerald the remaining $38,-250.23 he claimed. . . .

BALINO v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, 348 So. 2d 349 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . procedures relating to periodic evaluations of the patients’ conditions by medical review teams. 45 C.F.R. 250.23 . . .

CITIES SERVICE COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES, 316 F. Supp. 61 (S.D.N.Y. 1970)

. . . the proposed transaction, which has become effective in accordance with the procedure specified in § 250.23 . . . The “procedure specified in § 250.23” is purely technical, and presents no obstacle to SEC approval of . . .

MISSISSIPPI VALLEY GENERATING CO. v. UNITED STATES, 175 F. Supp. 505 (Ct. Cl. 1959)

. . . proposed transaction, which has become effective in accordance with the procedure specified in Section 250.23 . . .

MISSISSIPPI VALLEY GENERATING CO. ON ITS OWN BEHALF AND TO THE USE OF OTHERS v. THE UNITED STATES, 147 Ct. Cl. 1 (Ct. Cl. 1959)

. . . proposed transaction, which has become effective in accordance with the procedure specified in Section 250.23 . . .