Florida Statute 250.32 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XVII
MILITARY AFFAIRS AND RELATED MATTERS

Chapter 250
MILITARY AFFAIRS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 250.32

250.32 Commanding officer’s control of arms sales.—When any part of the militia of Florida is on state active duty by the order of the Governor to aid in the enforcement of the laws, the commanding officer of such troops may order the closing of any places where arms, ammunition, dynamite, explosives, or intoxicating liquors are sold, and may forbid the selling, bartering, lending, or giving away of any of those commodities in the city, town, or village where the troops are on duty, or in the vicinity of such place, for so long as any of the troops remain on duty in the vicinity. Such orders shall take effect whether any civil officer has issued a similar order; and the commanding officer of the troops may continue to enforce the prohibition until the departure of the troops, although the sheriff, mayor, or intendant of the county, city, town, or village may have prescribed an earlier or different date after which such selling, bartering, lending, or giving away may be carried on.

History.—s. 36, ch. 8052, 1921; CGL 2048; s. 1, ch. 25112, 1949; s. 27, ch. 2003-68.

Note.—Former s. 250.42.

F.S. 250.32 on Google Scholar

F.S. 250.32 on Casetext

Amendments to 250.32

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 250.32

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 250.32.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 250.32

Total Results: 3

In re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2007-06-21T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 959 So. 2d 250, 32 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 389, 2007 Fla. LEXIS 1103, 2007 WL 1774440

Snippet: Pariente, Quince, Wells 21 June 2007 959 So. 2d 250, 32 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 389, 2007 Fla. LEXIS 1103,

Schriefer v. Schriefer

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2002-12-19T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 831 So. 2d 1284

Snippet: each party. In this case, the wife received $30,250-$32,250. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

Radio Corporation of America v. LOCAL 780, ETC.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1964-01-16T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 160 So. 2d 150

Snippet: Association v. Local Union No. 542, 370 Pa. 73, 87 A.2d 250, 32 A.L.R.2d 822, cited with approval in Garner v.