Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 250.38 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 250.38 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 250.38

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XVII
MILITARY AFFAIRS AND RELATED MATTERS
Chapter 250
MILITARY AFFAIRS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 250.38
250.38 Liability.An action or proceeding may not be prosecuted or maintained against a member of a military court or officer or person acting under its authority or reviewing its proceeding on account of the approval, imposition, or execution of any sentence; the imposition or collection of a fine or penalty; or the execution of any warrant, writ, execution, process, or mandate of any military court. The jurisdiction of the courts and boards established by this chapter is presumed, and the burden of proof rests upon any person seeking to divest such courts or boards of jurisdiction in any action or proceeding.
History.s. 56, ch. 8502, 1921; CGL 2069; s. 1, ch. 25112, 1949; s. 36, ch. 2003-68.
Note.Former s. 250.63.

F.S. 250.38 on Google Scholar

F.S. 250.38 on Casetext

Amendments to 250.38


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 250.38
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 250.38.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

IMPRESA CONSTRUZIONI GEOM. DOMENICO GARUFI, v. UNITED STATES,, 100 Fed. Cl. 750 (Fed. Cl. 2011)

. . . Plaintiff may recover attorney fees for the resulting 250.38 hours. . . . 291.5), the number of hours spent on "mixed” or vague claims discounted for the unsuccessful claims (250.38 . . .

MITCHUM, v. J. ASTRUE,, 586 F. Supp. 2d 424 (D.S.C. 2007)

. . . Plaintiff now seeks an additional $250.38, which represents an additional 1.5 hours, for the time spent . . .

UNITED STATES v. P. BROWN, Sr., 548 F.2d 1194 (5th Cir. 1977)

. . . SHACK Item overstated Amount on TaxPayer's Return Amount Allowed By IRS_ (a) 1971 MIPS $582.00 $250.38 . . . (b) 1971 IEIP $395.00 (c) 1972 MIPS $644.00 $250.38 (d) 1972 IEIP $617.00 Taxpayer’s testimony: As to . . .

UNITED STATES v. MASSEY MOTORS,, 264 F.2d 552 (5th Cir. 1959)

. . . on sale, the automobile mentioned above, instead of yielding Massey Motors a return after taxes, of $250.38 . . .

MOMAND v. UNIVERSAL FILM EXCHANGE,, 6 F.R.D. 409 (D. Mass. 1947)

. . . Ex. 85, 90, 93) and of a claim of $250.38 on Sept. 11, 1928 (PI. Ex. 99, 102, 108). . . . reasonable relation to defendants’ actual claims for arbitration (which were $27.50 on May 9, 1928 and $250.38 . . .

LINEN THREAD CO. v. SHAW SAME v. MILLS, 9 F.2d 17 (1st Cir. 1925)

. . . The -whole amount'of the claim for which the vessel was libeled was $250.38. . . .