Cases from cite.case.law:

AT, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 24 F. Supp. 2d 399 (M.D. Pa. 1998)

. . . interest of justice if the statute of limitations on the taking claim has not run); United States v. 255.21 . . .

STEPHENSON, Jr. v. UNITED STATES, J. SNOGA, v. UNITED STATES, R. SNOGA, v. UNITED STATES,, 33 Fed. Cl. 63 (Fed. Cl. 1994)

. . . Defendant’s citation of United States v. 255.21 Acres, 722 F.Supp. 235 (D.Md.1989) is not apposite. . . .

F. GRIMSLEY, v. UNITED ENGINEERS AND CONSTRUCTORS, INC., 818 F. Supp. 147 (D.S.C. 1993)

. . . United States v. 255.21 Acres in Anne Arundel County, 722 F.Supp. 235, 242 (D.Md.1989) (citing Goldlavar . . .

MANSOLILLO, v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION,, 804 F. Supp. 426 (D.R.I. 1992)

. . . See, e.g., United States v. 255.21 Acres in Anne Arundel County, Md., 722 F.Supp. 235 (D.Md.1989) (possible . . .

EVANS, v. L. DUGGER, A. E. T. D. L. T., 908 F.2d 801 (11th Cir. 1990)

. . . See §§ 553.46-553.49, Fla.Stat. (1985); and § 255.21, Fla. Stat. (1985). . . . In so concluding, the court reasoned that the language contained in section 255.21(1), which called for . . . undertook some renovation of Dorm 6 of the West Unit at UCI after the threshold date established in § 255.21 . . .

LOCASCIO, v. CITY OF ST. PETERSBURG,, 731 F. Supp. 1522 (M.D. Fla. 1990)

. . . protection and due process clause of the Fourteenth amendment; and 3) state claims, violation of Sections 255.21 . . .

UNITED STATES v. ACRES IN ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, MARYLAND,, 722 F. Supp. 235 (D. Md. 1989)

. . . UNITED STATES of America v. 255.21 ACRES IN ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, MARYLAND, et al. Civ. No. . . .

CHRYSLER CORPORATION v. L. TOFANY E. CHRYSLER CORPORATION v. E. MALLOY E., 419 F.2d 499 (2d Cir. 1969)

. . . . § 255.21. . . .

CHRYSLER CORPORATION, v. W. RHODES, L. L. Jr., 416 F.2d 319 (1st Cir. 1969)

. . . . § 255.21), alleged to apply in this case. . . .

CHRYSLER CORPORATION, v. L. TOFANY, E., 305 F. Supp. 971 (N.D.N.Y. 1969)

. . . (Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 108, SI, S3.1.2, 23 C.P.R. 255.21). . . .

CHRYSLER CORPORATION v. E. MALLOY, E., 294 F. Supp. 524 (D. Vt. 1968)

. . . . § 255.21. . . .

CHRYSLER CORPORATION v. W. RHODES,, 294 F. Supp. 665 (D.N.H. 1968)

. . . . § 255.21- — regulations pertaining to lamps and associated equipment) although counsel for the plaintiffs . . .