Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 285.06 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 285.06 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 285.06

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XIX
PUBLIC BUSINESS
Chapter 285
INDIAN RESERVATIONS AND AFFAIRS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 285.06
285.06 State Indian Reservation.When, as the result of the exchanges provided for in ss. 285.04 and 285.05, there shall have been established a reservation for the Indians by the United States in Florida, the State Seminole Indian Reservation in Monroe County, created by chapter 7310, Acts of 1917, shall be withdrawn and returned to the board of trustees; and thereupon the Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund shall set aside a tract of land of approximately equal size and of suitable character, adjacently located, as nearly as may be, to the reservation to be established by the United States; and said lands, when so set aside, shall constitute the State Indian Reservation and shall be held in trust by the Department of Management Services for the perpetual benefit of the Indians and as a reservation for them.
History.s. 3, ch. 17065, 1935; CGL 1936 Supp. 1995(4); s. 2, ch. 61-119; ss. 22, 27, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 244, ch. 92-279; s. 55, ch. 92-326.

F.S. 285.06 on Google Scholar

F.S. 285.06 on Casetext

Amendments to 285.06


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 285.06
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 285.06.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

MICCOSUKEE TRIBE OF INDIANS OF FLORIDA, a v. UNITED STATES U. S. Lt. U. S. Bg., 716 F.3d 535 (11th Cir. 2013)

. . . . ยง 285.06, and granted 104,800 acres in Broward County as the new site for the Seminole reservation, . . .

LEFMANN v. BRILL, 142 F. 44 (6th Cir. 1905)

. . . 4th following he did obtain from Lefmann on account of this mortgage $5,715.94, leaving due to him $285.06 . . . He testifies that with this sum of $285.06 deducted from the amount of the note he owes ever)' dollar . . . Our conclusion, therefore, is that the complainant has a mortgage lien to the extent of $6,200, less $285.06 . . .