Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 288.31 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 288.31 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 288.31

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XIX
PUBLIC BUSINESS
Chapter 288
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 288.31
288.31 Armories; financing construction authorized.
(1) The Division of Bond Finance of the State Board of Administration shall have the power to borrow money and incur obligations by way of bonds, notes, or revenue certificates and issue such obligations for the purpose of financing, either in whole or in part, the construction of armories in such counties and municipalities as designated by the State Armory Board. The authority hereby conferred shall empower the said division to issue such certificates or bonds for the financing of the share or portion of the cost to be borne by a county or municipality when required by the provisions of a grant of funds from the state or the Federal Government or any other source, or to authorize the borrowing and issuing of obligations for financing such an armory in its entirety. Bonds, notes, or certificates issued hereunder shall be issued in conformity to all the provisions of chapter 215, and the division shall be empowered to fix the rentals or charges to be collected for the purpose of the retirement or purchase of said obligations. The division and the county or municipality shall be empowered to enter into such lease, or leases, as may be necessary to ensure the providing of sufficient funds to retire such obligations and when the said obligations shall have been fully paid, the armory shall be conveyed to the state. Leases with the county or municipality under the terms of this section shall provide for the control of the building and its use to be vested in the military commander representing the Armory Board in accordance with the provisions of s. 250.40.
(2) For the purpose of determining the amount of the contribution of any county or municipality toward the requirement of matching state or federal funds, real estate provided or donated by such county or municipality may be considered as a portion of the contribution required to the amount of the fair appraised value of the same as determined by the Armory Board, and all lands, buildings and structures shall be conveyed to and become the property of the Division of Bond Finance when it acts under the provisions of this section, the same to be conveyed to the state when all obligations against same shall have been paid in full.
(3) Nothing in this section shall be construed as authorizing the pledging, mortgaging or otherwise hypothecating the real estate and armory building, but the obligations issued hereunder shall pledge only the income from the armory building as covered in its rental by the county or municipality or from other sources.
(4) The purpose of this section is to provide a means for financing and supplying the funds necessary to be furnished by a county or municipality to meet and match funds made available by the state or federal government on a matching basis or to provide the total amount of the construction costs of armories.
(5) Counties and municipalities are hereby authorized and empowered to levy taxes not to exceed 1 mill to provide the funds necessary for the lease or leases herein provided and for the retirement of bonds or certificates of indebtedness issued by the division under the provisions of this section.
(6) Nothing in this section, however, shall be construed to repeal any provision of chapter 250, as amended in 1949.
History.s. 1, ch. 24200, 1947; ss. 1, 2, ch. 25125, 1949; (2), s. 10, ch. 26484, 1951; s. 11, ch. 29788, 1955; ss. 22, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 273, ch. 92-279; s. 55, ch. 92-326; s. 22, ch. 2004-5.
Note.Former s. 420.18.

F.S. 288.31 on Google Scholar

F.S. 288.31 on Casetext

Amendments to 288.31


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 288.31
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 288.31.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 288.31

Total Results: 20

State, Dept. of Transp. v. Sw Anderson

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1999-10-06

Citation: 744 So. 2d 1098, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 13170, 1999 WL 790707

Snippet: suit."); Rawls v. Tallahassee Hotel Co., 43 Fla. 288, 31 So. 237, 239 (1901) (holding that where a decree

Peninsular Point, Inc. v. South Georgia Dairy Co-Op, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1971-08-24

Citation: 251 So. 2d 690, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6193

Snippet: 705; Rawls v. Tallahassee Hotel Co., 43 Fla. 288, 31 South. 337; Robbins v. White, 52 Fla. 613, 42 South

Shaughnessy v. Metropolitan Dade County

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1970-08-11

Citation: 238 So. 2d 466

Snippet: proceedings. Rawls v. Tallahassee Hotel Company, 43 Fla. 288, 31 So. 237; Headley v. Lasseter, Fla.App. 1962, 147

State ex rel. Investment Corp. v. Board of Business Regulation

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1969-10-31

Citation: 227 So. 2d 674, 1969 Fla. LEXIS 2152

Snippet: “ ‘In Rawls v. Tallahassee Hotel Co., 43 Fla. 288, 31 So. 237, this court held: “ ‘ “A decree rendered

Bauer v. City of Gulfport

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1967-02-08

Citation: 195 So. 2d 571

Snippet: 3 Antieau, Municipal Corporation Law § 22.22 at 288.31 (1966). Motives which activate removal are not

Headley v. Lasseter

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1962-12-04

Citation: 147 So. 2d 154

Snippet: ' "In Rawls v. Tallahassee Hotel Co., 43 Fla. 288, 31 So. 237, this court held: "`A decree rendered in

Ocean Beach Hotel Company v. Town of Atlantic Beach

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1941-06-10

Citation: 2 So. 2d 879, 147 Fla. 445

Snippet: So. 435; Rawls v. Tallahassee Hotel Co., 43 Fla. 288,31 So. 237; Burns v. McDaniel, 104 Fla. 526; 140 So

Thompson v. Freeman

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1933-07-17

Citation: 149 So. 740, 111 Fla. 433, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 2004

Snippet: Baker, 30 N.Y. 355; Miles v. Loomis, 75 N.Y. 288, 31 Am. Re. 470. In this case, at the time of the trial

Burns v. McDaniel

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1932-03-22

Citation: 140 So. 314, 104 Fla. 526

Snippet: street. Rawls vs. Tallahassee Hotel Co.,43 Fla. 288, 31 So. 237. But the rights of *Page 532 ownership

Marshall Et Ux. v. Hartman

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1932-02-01

Citation: 139 So. 441, 104 Fla. 143

Snippet: So. 17; Rawls v. Tallahassee Hotel Co., 43 Fla. 288, 31 So. 237. However, this doctrine would not avail

McAdoo, as Trustee v. Moses

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1931-02-19

Citation: 132 So. 638, 101 Fla. 936, 1931 Fla. LEXIS 1884

Snippet: In Rawls vs. Tallahassee Hotel Company, 43 Fla. 288, 31 So. 237, this Court held: "A decree rendered

Lovett and Lovett v. Lovett

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1927-03-29

Citation: 112 So. 768, 93 Fla. 611

Snippet: motion. Rawls v. Tallahassee Hotel Co., 43 Fla. 288, 31 So. 237. In Craver et al. v. Spencer, 40 Fla. 135

Yager v. North & South Alafia River Phosphate Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1921-06-24

Citation: 82 Fla. 38, 89 So. 340

Snippet: party. See Rawls v. Tallahassee Hotel Co., 43 Fla. 288, 31 South. Rep. 237; Craver v. Spencer, 40 Fla. 135

Smith v. Horn

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1915-12-10

Citation: 70 Fla. 484, 70 So. 435

Snippet: 550; Rawls v. Tallahassee Hotel Co., 43 Fla. 288, 31 South. Rep. 237; Robbins v. White, 52 Fla. 613

Muldon v. Brawner

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1909-01-15

Citation: 57 Fla. 496

Snippet: estate. Rawls v. Tallahassee Hotel Co., 43 Fla. 288, 31 South. Rep. 237. The decree appealed from' is reversed

Graham v. Tucker

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1908-06-15

Citation: 56 Fla. 307

Snippet: 315; Rawls v. Tallahassee Hotel Co., 43 Fla. 288, 31 South. Rep. 237. A married woman it is true has

Seaboard Air Line Railway v. Southern Investment Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1907-01-15

Citation: 53 Fla. 832

Snippet: so- in Rawls v. Tallahassee Hotel Co., 43 Fla. 288, 31 South. Rep. 237, this court said: “The proprietor

Florida Land Rock Phosphate Co. v. Anderson

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1905-06-15

Citation: 50 Fla. 516

Snippet: 880 ; Rawls v. Tallahassee Hotel Co., 43 Fla. 288, 31 South. Rep. 237; Scott v. Jenkins, 46 Fla. 518

Hoodless v. Jernigan

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1903-06-15

Citation: 46 Fla. 213

Snippet: 342; Rawls v. Tallahassee Hotel Co., 43 Fla. 288, 31 South. Rep. 237; Southerland v. Sandlin, 44 Fla

Price v. Stratton

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1903-01-15

Citation: 45 Fla. 535

Snippet: A o; i.av-ls v. Tallahassee Hotel Co. 43 Fla. 288, 31 South. Rep. 237. The court, however, should not