Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 290.0055 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 290.0055 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 290.0055

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XIX
PUBLIC BUSINESS
Chapter 290
URBAN REDEVELOPMENT
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 290.0055
1290.0055 Local nominating procedure.
(1) If, pursuant to s. 290.0065, an opportunity exists for designation of a new enterprise zone, any county or municipality, or a county and one or more municipalities together, may apply to the department for the designation of an area as an enterprise zone after completion of the following:
(a) The adoption by the governing body or bodies of a resolution which:
1. Finds that an area exists in such county or municipality, or in both the county and one or more municipalities, which chronically exhibits extreme and unacceptable levels of poverty, unemployment, physical deterioration, and economic disinvestment;
2. Determines that the rehabilitation, conservation, or redevelopment, or a combination thereof, of such area is necessary in the interest of the public health, safety, and welfare of the residents of such county or municipality, or such county and one or more municipalities; and
3. Determines that the revitalization of such area can occur only if the private sector can be induced to invest its own resources in productive enterprises that build or rebuild the economic viability of the area.
(b) The creation of an enterprise zone development agency pursuant to s. 290.0056.
(c) The creation and adoption of a strategic plan pursuant to s. 290.0057.
(2) The governing body of a county as defined by s. 125.011(1) shall nominate all enterprise zones within the county.
(3) A county or municipality, or a county and one or more municipalities together, may not nominate more than one enterprise zone.
(4) An area nominated by a county or municipality, or a county and one or more municipalities together, for designation as an enterprise zone shall be eligible for designation under s. 290.0065 only if it meets the following criteria:
(a) The selected area does not exceed 20 square miles. The selected area must have a continuous boundary, or consist of not more than three noncontiguous parcels.
(b)1. The selected area does not exceed the following mileage limitation:
2. For communities having a total population of 150,000 persons or more, or for a rural enterprise zone, the selected area shall not exceed 20 square miles.
3. For communities having a total population of 50,000 persons or more but less than 150,000 persons, the selected area shall not exceed 10 square miles.
4. For communities having a total population of 20,000 persons or more but less than 50,000 persons, the selected area shall not exceed 5 square miles.
5. For communities having a total population of 7,500 persons or more but less than 20,000 persons, the selected area shall not exceed 3 square miles.
6. For communities having a total population of less than 7,500 persons, the selected area shall not exceed 3 square miles.
(c) The selected area suffers from pervasive poverty, unemployment, and general distress, as described and measured pursuant to s. 290.0058.
(5) To the greatest extent possible, the boundary of an area nominated must coincide with the boundaries of census geographic block groups.
(6)(a) The department may approve a change in the boundary of any enterprise zone which was designated pursuant to s. 290.0065. A boundary change must continue to satisfy the requirements of subsections (3), (4), and (5).
(b) Upon a recommendation by the enterprise zone development agency, the governing body of the jurisdiction which authorized the application for an enterprise zone may apply to the department for a change in boundary once every 3 years by adopting a resolution that:
1. States with particularity the reasons for the change; and
2. Describes specifically and, to the extent required by the department, the boundary change to be made.
(c) At least 90 days before adopting a resolution seeking a change in the boundary of an enterprise zone, the governing body shall include in a notice of the meeting at which the resolution will be considered an explanation that a change in the boundary of an enterprise zone will be considered and that the change may result in loss of enterprise zone eligibility for the area affected by the boundary change.
(d)1. The governing body of a jurisdiction which has nominated an application for an enterprise zone that is at least 15 square miles and less than 20 square miles and includes a portion of the state designated as a rural area of opportunity under s. 288.0656(7) may apply to the department to expand the boundary of the existing enterprise zone by not more than 3 square miles.
2. The governing body of a jurisdiction which has nominated an application for an enterprise zone that is at least 20 square miles and includes a portion of the state designated as a rural area of opportunity under s. 288.0656(7) may apply to the department to expand the boundary of the existing enterprise zone by not more than 5 square miles.
3. An application to expand the boundary of an enterprise zone under this paragraph must be submitted by December 31, 2013.
4. Notwithstanding the area limitations specified in subsection (4), the department may approve the request for a boundary amendment if the area continues to satisfy the remaining requirements of this section.
5. The department shall establish the initial effective date of an enterprise zone designated under this paragraph.
History.s. 46, ch. 84-356; s. 57, ch. 86-152; s. 25, ch. 88-201; s. 5, ch. 89-352; s. 21, ch. 92-319; ss. 21, 37, ch. 94-136; s. 2, ch. 96-412; s. 1, ch. 97-251; s. 5, ch. 98-220; ss. 3, 11, ch. 2005-287; s. 7, ch. 2006-113; s. 28, ch. 2011-76; s. 205, ch. 2011-142; s. 48, ch. 2012-96; s. 35, ch. 2013-39; s. 36, ch. 2014-218.
1Note.Repealed December 31, 2015, by s. 11, ch. 2005-287.

F.S. 290.0055 on Google Scholar

F.S. 290.0055 on Casetext

Amendments to 290.0055


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 290.0055
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 290.0055.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 290.0055

Total Results: 12

Gulf Atlantic Office Properties, Inc. v. Department of Revenue

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2014-01-17

Citation: 133 So. 3d 537, 2014 WL 185201, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 448

Snippet: 2005, been in an “enterprise zone” (EZ). See § 290.0055, Fla. Stat. (1999), repealed by Ch. 94-136, §

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1993-08-02

Snippet: project in an enterprise zone approved pursuant to s.290.0055; the location of the project in a community development

Ebeling v. Lowry

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1967-11-08

Citation: 203 So. 2d 506

Snippet: Hough v. State Bank of New Smyrna, 1911, 61 Fla. 290, 55 So. 462. In the Hough case the defendant, C.V.

Tampa Electric Company v. Fleischaker

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1943-04-06

Citation: 12 So. 2d 901, 152 Fla. 701, 1943 Fla. LEXIS 1010

Snippet: Southern Railway Co. v. Laxson, 217 Ala. 1, 114 So. 290; 55 A.L.R. 385, and annotations beginning with page

St. Lucie Estates, Inc. v. Nobles

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1932-08-24

Citation: 143 So. 443, 106 Fla. 575

Snippet: Huff et al. vs. State Bank of New Smyrna, 61 Fla. 290, 55 So. 462. Chapter 6486, supra, amongst other things

East Coast Stores, Inc. v. Cuthbert Et Ux.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1931-04-01

Citation: 133 So. 863, 101 Fla. 25

Snippet: Barnett, 17 Fla. 272; Hough v. State Bank, 61 Fla. 290, 55 So. 462, Ann. Cas. 1912d 1200; Forest Inv. Co.

Cracowaner v. Carlton National Bank

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1929-10-28

Citation: 124 So. 275, 98 Fla. 792

Snippet: liability. Hough v. State Bank of New Smyrna, 61 Fla. 290, 55 So. R. 462; Williams v. Peninsular Gro. Co., 73

Prosser v. Orlando Bank & Trust Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1927-07-05

Citation: 111 So. 516, 93 Fla. 177

Snippet: liability." Hough v. State Bank of New Smyrna, 61 Fla. 290, 55 South. Rep. 462. The last cited case was decided

Forest Investment Co. v. Aultman

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1920-12-04

Citation: 80 Fla. 790, 87 So. 43, 1920 Fla. LEXIS 578

Snippet: in Hough v. State Bank of New Smyrna, 61 Fla. 290, 55 South. Rep. 462; Webster v. Barnett, 17 Fla. 272;

Mechanics & Metals National Bank v. Angel

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1920-05-12

Citation: 79 Fla. 761, 85 So. 675

Snippet: 50; Hough v. State Bank of New Smyrna, 61 Fla. 290, 55 South. Rep. 462; Somers v. Florida Pebble Phosphate

Williams v. Peninsular Grocery Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1917-05-03

Citation: 73 Fla. 937, 75 So. 517

Snippet: Hough v. *951State Bank of New Smyrna, 61 Fla. 290, 55 South. Rep. 462. If such a construction as the

Hopkins v. Commercial Bank

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1912-06-15

Citation: 64 Fla. 310

Snippet: Hough v. State Bank of New Smyrna, 61, *313Fla. 290, 55 South. Rep. 462; Webster v. Barnett, 17 Fla. 272