Florida Statute 290.004 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XIX
PUBLIC BUSINESS

Chapter 290
URBAN REDEVELOPMENT

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 290.004

¹290.004 Definitions relating to Florida Enterprise Zone Act.—As used in ss. 290.001-290.016:

(1) “Community investment corporation” means a black business investment corporation, a certified development corporation, a small business investment corporation, or other similar entity incorporated under Florida law that has limited its investment policy to making investments solely in minority business enterprises.

(2) “Department” means the Department of Commerce.

(3) “Governing body” means the council or other legislative body charged with governing the county or municipality.

(4) “Minority business enterprise” has the same meaning as provided in s. 288.703.

(5) “Rural enterprise zone” means an enterprise zone that is nominated by a county having a population of 75,000 or fewer, or a county having a population of 100,000 or fewer which is contiguous to a county having a population of 75,000 or fewer, or by a municipality in such a county, or by such a county and one or more municipalities. An enterprise zone designated in accordance with s. 290.0065(5)(b) is considered to be a rural enterprise zone.

(6) “Small business” has the same meaning as provided in s. 288.703.

History.—s. 1, ch. 82-119; s. 27, ch. 83-55; ss. 45, 57, ch. 84-356; ss. 19, 37, ch. 94-136; s. 119, ch. 96-320; s. 15, ch. 2001-201; ss. 2, 11, ch. 2005-287; s. 192, ch. 2008-247; s. 204, ch. 2011-142; s. 79, ch. 2024-6.

¹Note.—Repealed December 31, 2015, by s. 11, ch. 2005-287.

F.S. 290.004 on Google Scholar

F.S. 290.004 on Casetext

Amendments to 290.004

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 290.004

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 290.004.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 290.004

Total Results: 8

Monroe v. PUBLIX 148

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2001-08-10T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 790 So. 2d 1249

Snippet: substantively since its amendment in 1977, see Ch. 77-290, § 4, at 1288, Laws of Fla.is not incompatible with

State v. Smith

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1971-05-12T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 249 So. 2d 16

Snippet: So.2d 284, 288 (Fla.App.2d 1970). [3] Id. at 290. [4] 239 So.2d 284, 293 (Fla.App.2d 1970). [5] 159

Shayne v. Pike

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1938-01-14T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 178 So. 903, 131 Fla. 71, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1390

Snippet: K.W. Ry. Co. v. Boy,34 Fla. 389, 16 South. Rep. 290; 4 Ency. Pl. Pr. 31, et seq.; Hunto v. City of Jacksonville

Rifas v. Gross Baum

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1932-09-20T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 143 So. 600, 106 Fla. 708

Snippet: W. Ry. Co. vs. Boy, 34 Fla. 389, 16 So.2d Rep. 290; 4 Ency. Pl. Prc. 31 et seq.; Hunt vs. City of Jacksonville

First National Bank v. Gibbs

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1919-07-14T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 78 Fla. 118, 82 So. 618

Snippet: W. Ry. Co. v. Boy, 34 Fla. 389, 16 South. Rep. 290; 4 Ency. Pl. & Pr. 31 et seq.; Hunt v. City of

Henry v. Spitler

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1914-03-03T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 67 Fla. 146, 64 So. 745

Snippet: valuable case note will also be found on page 290 of 4 Ann. Cas. Even if we should hold that the court

Pensacola & Atlantic R. R. v. Jackson

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1884-06-14T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 21 Fla. 146

Snippet: 316, 323, (cited 3 Myl. & Cr., 784; 33 Beav., 290; 4 Railroad and Canal cases, 69;) Attorney-General

State v. Jacksonville, Pensacola & Mobile Railroad

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1878-06-15T00:00:02-07:52:58

Citation: 16 Fla. 708

Snippet: 349 ; 1 C. Green, 271 ; 6 Mass., 499 ; 1 Morris, 290 ; 4 R. I., 114 ; 3 Rev., 385 ; 9 Iowa, 201 ; 30 Ga.