Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 295.9 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 295.09 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 295.09 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 295.09

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XX
VETERANS
Chapter 295
LAWS RELATING TO VETERANS: GENERAL PROVISIONS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 295.09
295.09 Reinstatement or reemployment; promotion preference.
(1)(a) When an employee of the state or any of its political subdivisions employed in a position subject or not subject to a career service system or other merit-type system, not including positions that are exempt pursuant to s. 295.07(5), has served in the Armed Forces of the United States and is discharged or separated therefrom with an honorable discharge, the state or its political subdivision shall reemploy or reinstate such person to the same position that he or she held before such service in the armed forces, or to an equivalent position, provided that such person returns to the position within 1 year after his or her date of separation or, in cases of extended active duty, within 1 year after the date of discharge or separation subsequent to the extension. Such person must also be awarded preference in promotion and be promoted ahead of all others who are as well qualified or less qualified for the position. When an examination for promotion is used, such person must be awarded preference points, as provided in s. 295.08, and be promoted ahead of all those who appear in an equal or lesser position on the promotional register, provided that he or she first successfully passes the examination for the promotional position.
(b) The provisions of paragraph (a) shall also apply to a person who was a veteran when employed by the state or its political subdivision and who was recalled to extended active duty in the Armed Forces of the United States and was discharged or separated therefrom with an honorable discharge.
(c) The provisions of paragraphs (a) and (b) shall apply only to a veteran’s first promotion after reinstatement or reemployment, without exception.
(2) For the purposes of this section, “extended active duty” means active duty, other than for training, beyond the date of honorable discharge or separation, due to military requirements.
History.s. 3, ch. 24201, 1947; s. 1, ch. 77-422; s. 2, ch. 78-372; s. 2, ch. 80-370; s. 3, ch. 89-323; s. 250, ch. 95-148; s. 81, ch. 99-13; s. 5, ch. 2021-57.

F.S. 295.09 on Google Scholar

F.S. 295.09 on CourtListener

Amendments to 295.09


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 295.09

Total Results: 10

Brennan v. City of Miami

146 So. 3d 119, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 13677, 2014 WL 4340997

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 3, 2014 | Docket: 1150539

Cited 1 times | Published

lieutenant’s promotional preference, pursuant to section 295.09, Florida Statutes (2012), and rule 55A-7.0111

City of Deland v. Landolfi

97 So. 3d 869, 2012 WL 3537225, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 13622

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 17, 2012 | Docket: 60311990

Published

Fla. Stat. (1986 Supp.) (referring only to section 295.09(l)(a) and (b)). The 1987 amendments expanded

Keller v. Public Employees Relations Commission

691 So. 2d 36, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 3182, 1997 WL 154331

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 4, 1997 | Docket: 64772263

Published

promoted to sergeant in 1994. Keller relies on section 295.09, Florida Statutes (1995) as the basis for his

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Feb 10, 1994 | Docket: 3257884

Published

substantially the following question: Does section 295.09, Florida Statutes, require a public employer

Ramirez v. City of Miami

627 So. 2d 48, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11555, 1993 WL 469311

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 16, 1993 | Docket: 64744248

Published

added to their promotion examination results. § 295.09, Fla.Stat. (1977) (emphasis added). “The purpose

City of Miami v. Burmeister

512 So. 2d 1047, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2170, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10138

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 8, 1987 | Docket: 64629602

Published

he would have been promoted. Prior to 1978, section 295.09 provided that the preference points would be

Stevens v. City of Miami

500 So. 2d 305, 42 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 985, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 117, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11174, 42 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 36,719

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 1986 | Docket: 64624118

Published

exe*307cuted it of the “veterans preference” in-Section 295.09(l)(a) Florida Statutes (1979). Even if this

City of Miami v. Farrington

405 So. 2d 1043, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 28151

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 10, 1981 | Docket: 64586066

Published

726 (Fla. 1952); § 295.14(2), Fla.Stat. (1980); § 295.09, Fla.Stat. (1978).

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: May 2, 1979 | Docket: 3257739

Published

afterreinstatement or reemployment of the veteran.' Section 295.09, F. S. 1977 (Emphasis supplied.). Under s.

Yates v. Rezeau

62 So. 2d 726, 1952 Fla. LEXIS 1934

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 16, 1952 | Docket: 64483939

Published

have properly interpreted the provisions of Section 295.09, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., respecting’ veterans’