Florida Statute 315.04 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXII
PORTS AND HARBORS

Chapter 315
PORT FACILITIES FINANCING

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 315.04

315.04 Other consents or approvals; use of state lands.—Except as hereinafter provided in this section, and except as provided in s. 315.03(1), the approval or consent of any other political subdivision or public body, agency or instrumentality of the State of Florida, except the Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund, shall not be required for the exercise of any of the powers granted by this law. Any municipality located in a county authorized by law to operate port facilities or in which there is a port district or a port authority shall exercise any powers granted by this law only if the governing body of such county, port district or port authority shall by resolution determine that the best interests of the county will be served thereby and consent thereto. The State of Florida hereby consents to the exercise of any and all powers granted by this law without further authorization or approval thereof by any of its agencies or instrumentalities, except as may be required from the Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund as to the use of any state lands lying under water which are necessary for the accomplishment of the purposes of this law.

History.—s. 4, ch. 59-411; ss. 27, 35, ch. 69-106.

F.S. 315.04 on Google Scholar

F.S. 315.04 on Casetext

Amendments to 315.04

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 315.04

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 315.04.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 315.04

Total Results: 20

Shands Jacksonville Medical Center, Inc., and University of Florida Board of Trustees

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-12-11

Snippet: necessary to avoid payment of improper claims.” § 766.315(4)(b), (j), Fla. Stat. The whole point of the

Shands Jacksonville Medical Center, Inc., and University of Florida Board of Trustees

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-12-11

Snippet: necessary to avoid payment of improper claims.” § 766.315(4)(b), (j), Fla. Stat. The whole point of the

Showntail the Legend, LLC v. State of Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2020-09-14

Snippet: conditions that pose a threat to public health.” § 381.00315(4), Fla. Stat.; see also § 381.00315(1)(d), Fla.

Bennett v. St. Vincent's Medical Center, Inc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2011-07-07

Citation: 71 So. 3d 828, 2011 WL 2637444

Snippet: claims, among other duties. See generally § 766.315(4), Fla. Stat. (2001). II. Statutory Interpretation

FLORIDA BIRTH-RELATED NICA v. Ferguson

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2004-04-02

Citation: 869 So. 2d 686, 2004 WL 690565

Snippet: purposes for which the plan is created." § 766.315(4)(g), Fla. Stat. (2000). In Humana of Florida, Inc

Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Ass'n v. Feld

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2001-08-01

Citation: 793 So. 2d 1070, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 10837, 2001 WL 864282

Snippet: participant. We agree. In addition, under section 766.315(4)(f), (h), and (k), NICA is allowed to sue and be

Shands Teaching Hosp. v. Humana Medical

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1999-02-18

Citation: 727 So. 2d 341, 1999 WL 73986

Snippet: provider. § 641.315, Fla. Stat. (1997). Although § 614.315(4) requires a contract between an HMO and a provider

Jones v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1997-10-20

Citation: 701 So. 2d 76, 1997 WL 652073

Snippet: therein to the Governor and Legislature. *82 § 20.315(4)(b)2, Fla. Stat. (1995). After Tafero's and Medina's

Humana of Florida, Inc. v. McKaughan

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1995-03-03

Citation: 652 So. 2d 852

Snippet: purposes for which the plan is created." § 766.315(4)(g). In this case, the Association is acting in

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1991-12-18

Snippet: profession, or occupation.[3] In addition, s. 402.315(4), F.S., authorized a county to collect a fee for

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1991-09-26

Snippet: preliminary proceeding, unconstitutional). 4 579 So.2d 315 (4 D.C.A. Fla., 1991). 5 Section 112.533(2)(b), F

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1982-04-20

Snippet: facilities, and s 315.04 provides generally that except as required by ss 315.03(1) and 315.04, the consent

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1981-11-03

Snippet: Criminal Justice on your behalf. Pursuant to s. 20.315(4), F.S., the head of the Department of Corrections

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1979-02-08

Snippet: So. 801 (Fla. 1927); Dotty v. State, 197 So.2d 315 (4 D.C.A. Fla., 1967). Thus, the Legislature must

Rose v. D'ALESSANDRO

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1978-10-06

Citation: 364 So. 2d 763

Snippet: public inspection. In Vogel v. Gruaz, 110 U.S. 311, 315, 4 S.Ct. 12, 14, 28 L.Ed. 158, 160 (1884) the Court

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1976-10-08

Snippet: of Ch. 470, F. S.; and Dotty v. State, 197 So.2d 315 (4 D.C.A. Fla., 1967), holding that the word "or"

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1976-03-11

Snippet: So.2d 1 (Fla. 1973); Dotty v. State, 197 So.2d 315 (4 D.C.A. Fla., 1967); Conner v. Alderman, 159 So

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1975-10-30

Snippet: Fla., 1966); Dotty v. State of Florida, 197 So.2d 315 (4 D.C.A. Fla., 1967). Thus, it is my opinion that

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1974-05-10

Snippet: purpose of the legislation. Dotty v. State, 197 So.2d 315 (4 D.C.A. Fla., 1967); Pinellas County v. Woolley

Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States v. McRee

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1918-02-13

Citation: 75 Fla. 257, 78 So. 22

Snippet: Whitfield, J. The amended declaration herein is as follows: “Jules McRee, an infant, plaintiff, by his next friend, M. S. McRee, by his attorneys Hill, Hill, Whiting & Stern, Dickenson & Dickenson and S. V. Ray, sues The Equitable Life Assurance Society, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of New York, defendant, which has been summoned to answer the plaintiff in a civil action for that whereas, “Heretofore, to-wit, on the 24th day of July, 1896, in consideration of