Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 316.0083 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 316.0083 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 316.0083

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXIII
MOTOR VEHICLES
Chapter 316
STATE UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 316.0083
316.0083 Mark Wandall Traffic Safety Program; administration; report.
(1)(a) For purposes of administering this section, the department, a county, or a municipality may authorize a traffic infraction enforcement officer under s. 316.640 to issue a traffic citation for a violation of s. 316.074(1) or s. 316.075(1)(c)1. A notice of violation and a traffic citation may not be issued for failure to stop at a red light if the driver is making a right-hand turn in a careful and prudent manner at an intersection where right-hand turns are permissible. A notice of violation and a traffic citation may not be issued under this section if the driver of the vehicle came to a complete stop after crossing the stop line and before turning right if permissible at a red light, but failed to stop before crossing over the stop line or other point at which a stop is required. This paragraph does not prohibit a review of information from a traffic infraction detector by an authorized employee or agent of the department, a county, or a municipality before issuance of the traffic citation by the traffic infraction enforcement officer. This paragraph does not prohibit the department, a county, or a municipality from issuing notification as provided in paragraph (b) to the registered owner of the motor vehicle involved in the violation of s. 316.074(1) or s. 316.075(1)(c)1.
(b)1.a. Within 30 days after a violation, notification must be sent to the registered owner of the motor vehicle involved in the violation specifying the remedies available under s. 318.14 and that the violator must pay the penalty of $158 to the department, county, or municipality, or furnish an affidavit in accordance with paragraph (d), or request a hearing within 60 days following the date of the notification in order to avoid the issuance of a traffic citation. The notification must be sent by first-class mail. The mailing of the notice of violation constitutes notification.
b. Included with the notification to the registered owner of the motor vehicle involved in the infraction must be a notice that the owner has the right to review the photographic or electronic images or the streaming video evidence that constitutes a rebuttable presumption against the owner of the vehicle. The notice must state the time and place or Internet location where the evidence may be examined and observed.
c. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a person who receives a notice of violation under this section may request a hearing within 60 days following the notification of violation or pay the penalty pursuant to the notice of violation, but a payment or fee may not be required before the hearing requested by the person. The notice of violation must be accompanied by, or direct the person to a website that provides, information on the person’s right to request a hearing and on all court costs related thereto and a form to request a hearing. As used in this sub-subparagraph, the term “person” includes a natural person, registered owner or co-owner of a motor vehicle, or person identified on an affidavit as having care, custody, or control of the motor vehicle at the time of the violation.
d. If the registered owner or co-owner of the motor vehicle, or the person designated as having care, custody, or control of the motor vehicle at the time of the violation, or an authorized representative of the owner, co-owner, or designated person, initiates a proceeding to challenge the violation pursuant to this paragraph, such person waives any challenge or dispute as to the delivery of the notice of violation.
2. Penalties assessed and collected by the department, county, or municipality authorized to collect the funds provided for in this paragraph, less the amount retained by the county or municipality pursuant to subparagraph 3., shall be paid to the Department of Revenue weekly. Payment by the department, county, or municipality to the state shall be made by means of electronic funds transfers. In addition to the payment, summary detail of the penalties remitted shall be reported to the Department of Revenue.
3. Penalties to be assessed and collected by the department, county, or municipality are as follows:
a. One hundred fifty-eight dollars for a violation of s. 316.074(1) or s. 316.075(1)(c)1. when a driver failed to stop at a traffic signal if enforcement is by the department’s traffic infraction enforcement officer. One hundred dollars shall be remitted to the Department of Revenue for deposit into the General Revenue Fund, $10 shall be remitted to the Department of Revenue for deposit into the Department of Health Emergency Medical Services Trust Fund, $3 shall be remitted to the Department of Revenue for deposit into the Brain and Spinal Cord Injury Trust Fund, and $45 shall be distributed to the municipality in which the violation occurred, or, if the violation occurred in an unincorporated area, to the county in which the violation occurred. Funds deposited into the Department of Health Emergency Medical Services Trust Fund under this sub-subparagraph shall be distributed as provided in s. 395.4036(1). Proceeds of the infractions in the Brain and Spinal Cord Injury Trust Fund shall be distributed quarterly to the Miami Project to Cure Paralysis and used for brain and spinal cord research.
b. One hundred fifty-eight dollars for a violation of s. 316.074(1) or s. 316.075(1)(c)1. when a driver failed to stop at a traffic signal if enforcement is by a county or municipal traffic infraction enforcement officer. Seventy dollars shall be remitted by the county or municipality to the Department of Revenue for deposit into the General Revenue Fund, $10 shall be remitted to the Department of Revenue for deposit into the Department of Health Emergency Medical Services Trust Fund, $3 shall be remitted to the Department of Revenue for deposit into the Brain and Spinal Cord Injury Trust Fund, and $75 shall be retained by the county or municipality enforcing the ordinance enacted pursuant to this section. Funds deposited into the Department of Health Emergency Medical Services Trust Fund under this sub-subparagraph shall be distributed as provided in s. 395.4036(1). Proceeds of the infractions in the Brain and Spinal Cord Injury Trust Fund shall be distributed quarterly to the Miami Project to Cure Paralysis and used for brain and spinal cord research.
4. An individual may not receive a commission from any revenue collected from violations detected through the use of a traffic infraction detector. A manufacturer or vendor may not receive a fee or remuneration based upon the number of violations detected through the use of a traffic infraction detector.
(c)1.a. A traffic citation issued under this section shall be issued by mailing the traffic citation by certified mail to the address of the registered owner of the motor vehicle involved in the violation if payment has not been made within 60 days after notification under paragraph (b), if the registered owner has not requested a hearing as authorized under paragraph (b), or if the registered owner has not submitted an affidavit under this section.
b. Delivery of the traffic citation constitutes notification under this paragraph. If the registered owner or co-owner of the motor vehicle, or the person designated as having care, custody, or control of the motor vehicle at the time of the violation, or a duly authorized representative of the owner, co-owner, or designated person, initiates a proceeding to challenge the citation pursuant to this section, such person waives any challenge or dispute as to the delivery of the traffic citation.
c. In the case of joint ownership of a motor vehicle, the traffic citation shall be mailed to the first name appearing on the registration, unless the first name appearing on the registration is a business organization, in which case the second name appearing on the registration may be used.
2. Included with the notification to the registered owner of the motor vehicle involved in the infraction shall be a notice that the owner has the right to review, in person or remotely, the photographic or electronic images or the streaming video evidence that constitutes a rebuttable presumption against the owner of the vehicle. The notice must state the time and place or Internet location where the evidence may be examined and observed.
(d)1. The owner of the motor vehicle involved in the violation is responsible and liable for paying the uniform traffic citation issued for a violation of s. 316.074(1) or s. 316.075(1)(c)1. when the driver failed to stop at a traffic signal, unless the owner can establish that:
a. The motor vehicle passed through the intersection in order to yield right-of-way to an emergency vehicle or as part of a funeral procession;
b. The motor vehicle passed through the intersection at the direction of a law enforcement officer;
c. The motor vehicle was, at the time of the violation, in the care, custody, or control of another person;
d. A uniform traffic citation was issued by a law enforcement officer to the driver of the motor vehicle for the alleged violation of s. 316.074(1) or s. 316.075(1)(c)1.; or
e. The motor vehicle’s owner was deceased on or before the date that the uniform traffic citation was issued, as established by an affidavit submitted by the representative of the motor vehicle owner’s estate or other designated person or family member.
2. In order to establish such facts, the owner of the motor vehicle shall, within 30 days after the date of issuance of the traffic citation, furnish to the appropriate governmental entity an affidavit setting forth detailed information supporting an exemption as provided in this paragraph.
a. An affidavit supporting an exemption under sub-subparagraph 1.c. must include the name, address, date of birth, and, if known, the driver license number of the person who leased, rented, or otherwise had care, custody, or control of the motor vehicle at the time of the alleged violation. If the vehicle was stolen at the time of the alleged offense, the affidavit must include the police report indicating that the vehicle was stolen.
b. If a traffic citation for a violation of s. 316.074(1) or s. 316.075(1)(c)1. was issued at the location of the violation by a law enforcement officer, the affidavit must include the serial number of the uniform traffic citation.
c. If the motor vehicle’s owner to whom a traffic citation has been issued is deceased, the affidavit must include a certified copy of the owner’s death certificate showing that the date of death occurred on or before the issuance of the uniform traffic citation and one of the following:
(I) A bill of sale or other document showing that the deceased owner’s motor vehicle was sold or transferred after his or her death, but on or before the date of the alleged violation.
(II) Documentary proof that the registered license plate belonging to the deceased owner’s vehicle was returned to the department or any branch office or authorized agent of the department, but on or before the date of the alleged violation.
(III) A copy of a police report showing that the deceased owner’s registered license plate or motor vehicle was stolen after the owner’s death, but on or before the date of the alleged violation.

Upon receipt of the affidavit and documentation required under this sub-subparagraph, the governmental entity must dismiss the citation and provide proof of such dismissal to the person that submitted the affidavit.

3. Upon receipt of an affidavit, the person designated as having care, custody, or control of the motor vehicle at the time of the violation may be issued a notice of violation pursuant to paragraph (b) for a violation of s. 316.074(1) or s. 316.075(1)(c)1. when the driver failed to stop at a traffic signal. The affidavit is admissible in a proceeding pursuant to this section for the purpose of providing proof that the person identified in the affidavit was in actual care, custody, or control of the motor vehicle. The owner of a leased vehicle for which a traffic citation is issued for a violation of s. 316.074(1) or s. 316.075(1)(c)1. when the driver failed to stop at a traffic signal is not responsible for paying the traffic citation and is not required to submit an affidavit as specified in this subsection if the motor vehicle involved in the violation is registered in the name of the lessee of such motor vehicle.
4. Paragraphs (b) and (c) apply to the person identified on the affidavit, except that the notification under sub-subparagraph (b)1.a. must be sent to the person identified on the affidavit within 30 days after receipt of an affidavit.
5. The submission of a false affidavit is a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.
(e) The photographic or electronic images or streaming video attached to or referenced in the traffic citation is evidence that a violation of s. 316.074(1) or s. 316.075(1)(c)1. when the driver failed to stop at a traffic signal has occurred and is admissible in any proceeding to enforce this section and raises a rebuttable presumption that the motor vehicle named in the report or shown in the photographic or electronic images or streaming video evidence was used in violation of s. 316.074(1) or s. 316.075(1)(c)1. when the driver failed to stop at a traffic signal.
(2) A notice of violation and a traffic citation may not be issued for failure to stop at a red light if the driver is making a right-hand turn in a careful and prudent manner at an intersection where right-hand turns are permissible.
(3) This section supplements the enforcement of s. 316.074(1) or s. 316.075(1)(c)1. by law enforcement officers when a driver fails to stop at a traffic signal and does not prohibit a law enforcement officer from issuing a traffic citation for a violation of s. 316.074(1) or s. 316.075(1)(c)1. when a driver fails to stop at a traffic signal in accordance with normal traffic enforcement techniques.
(4)(a)1. A county or municipality that desires to have one or more traffic infraction detectors placed or installed on or after July 1, 2025, in an area where no traffic infraction detectors are currently placed or installed must enact an ordinance in order to authorize the placement or installation of, or to authorize contracting with a vendor for the placement or installation of, one or more traffic infraction detectors to enforce s. 316.074(1) or s. 316.075(1)(c)1. As part of the public hearing on such proposed ordinance, the county or municipality must consider traffic data or other evidence supporting the installation and operation of each traffic infraction detector, and the county or municipality must determine that the intersection at which a traffic infraction detector is to be placed or installed constitutes a heightened safety risk that warrants additional enforcement measures.
2. A county or municipality that operates one or more traffic infraction detectors must annually report the results of all traffic infraction detectors within the county’s or municipality’s jurisdiction by placing the annual report to the department required under paragraph (b) as a single reporting item on the agenda of a regular or special meeting of the county’s or municipality’s governing body. Before a county or municipality contracts or renews a contract to place or install one or more traffic infraction detectors, the county or municipality must approve the contract or contract renewal at a regular or special meeting of the county’s or municipality’s governing body.
a. Interested members of the public must be allowed to comment regarding the report, contract, or contract renewal under the county’s or municipality’s public comment policies or formats, and the report, contract, or contract renewal may not be considered as part of a consent agenda.
b. The report required under this subparagraph must include a written summary, which must be read aloud at the regular or special meeting, and the summary must contain, for the same time period pertaining to the annual report to the department required under paragraph (b), the number of notices of violation issued, the number that were contested, the number that were upheld, the number that were dismissed, the number that were issued as uniform traffic citations, and the number that were paid and how collected funds were distributed and in what amounts. The county or municipality must report to the department that the county’s or municipality’s annual report was considered in accordance with this subparagraph, including the date of the regular or special meeting at which the annual report was considered.
3. The compliance or sufficiency of compliance with this paragraph may not be raised in a proceeding challenging a violation of s. 316.074(1) or s. 316.075(1)(c)1. enforced by a traffic infraction detector.
4. A county or municipality that does not comply with this paragraph is suspended from operating traffic infraction detectors under this subsection until such noncompliance is corrected.
(b) Each county or municipality that operates a traffic infraction detector shall submit a report by October 1, 2012, and annually thereafter, to the department which details the results of using the traffic infraction detector and the procedures for enforcement for the preceding state fiscal year. The information submitted by the counties and municipalities must include:
1. The number of notices of violation issued, the number that were contested, the number that were upheld, the number that were dismissed, the number that were issued as uniform traffic citations, the number that were paid, and the number in each of the preceding categories for which the notice of violation was issued for a right-hand turn violation.
2. A description of alternative safety countermeasures taken before and after the placement or installation of a traffic infraction detector.
3. Statistical data and information required by the department to complete the summary report required under paragraph (c).

The department must publish each report submitted by a county or municipality pursuant to this paragraph on its website.

(c) On or before December 31, 2012, and annually thereafter, the department shall provide a summary report to the Governor, the President of the Senate, and the Speaker of the House of Representatives regarding the use and operation of traffic infraction detectors under this section, along with the department’s recommendations and any necessary legislation. The summary report must include a review of the information submitted to the department by the counties and municipalities and must describe the enhancement of the traffic safety and enforcement programs.
(5) Procedures for a hearing under this section are as follows:
(a) The department shall publish and make available electronically to each county and municipality a model Request for Hearing form to assist each local government administering this section.
(b) The charter county, noncharter county, or municipality electing to authorize traffic infraction enforcement officers to issue traffic citations under paragraph (1)(a) shall designate by resolution existing staff to serve as the clerk to the local hearing officer.
(c) Any person, herein referred to as the “petitioner,” who elects to request a hearing under paragraph (1)(b) shall be scheduled for a hearing by the clerk to the local hearing officer to appear before a local hearing officer with notice to be sent by first-class mail. Upon receipt of the notice, the petitioner may reschedule the hearing once by submitting a written request to reschedule to the clerk to the local hearing officer, at least 5 calendar days before the day of the originally scheduled hearing. The petitioner may cancel his or her appearance before the local hearing officer by paying the penalty assessed under paragraph (1)(b), plus $50 in administrative costs, before the start of the hearing.
(d) All testimony at the hearing shall be under oath and shall be recorded. The local hearing officer shall take testimony from a traffic infraction enforcement officer and the petitioner, and may take testimony from others. The local hearing officer shall review the photographic or electronic images or the streaming video made available under sub-subparagraph(1)(b)1.b. Formal rules of evidence do not apply, but due process shall be observed and govern the proceedings.
(e) At the conclusion of the hearing, the local hearing officer shall determine whether a violation under this section has occurred, in which case the hearing officer shall uphold or dismiss the violation. The local hearing officer shall issue a final administrative order including the determination and, if the notice of violation is upheld, require the petitioner to pay the penalty previously assessed under paragraph (1)(b), and may also require the petitioner to pay county or municipal costs, not to exceed $250. The final administrative order shall be mailed to the petitioner by first-class mail.
(f) An aggrieved party may appeal a final administrative order consistent with the process provided under s. 162.11.
History.s. 5, ch. 2010-80; s. 98, ch. 2012-174; ss. 3, 74, ch. 2012-181; s. 43, ch. 2013-15; s. 5, ch. 2013-160; s. 3, ch. 2024-223.

F.S. 316.0083 on Google Scholar

F.S. 316.0083 on Casetext

Amendments to 316.0083


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 316.0083
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S316.0083 1d4 - NONMOVING TRAFFIC VIOL - RENUMBERED. SEE REC # 7581 - M: S
S316.0083 1d5 - NONMOVING TRAFFIC VIOL - FALSE AFFIDAVIT RE NO LIABILITY FOR CITATION - M: S



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 316.0083

Total Results: 18

Steven J. Pincus, etc. v. American Traffic Solutions, Inc., etc.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2022-02-02T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: steady red light signal, in violation of sections 316.0083, 316.074(1), and 316.075(1)(c)1, Florida Statutes…the convenience fee was prohibited by sections 316.0083(b)(4), 318.121, and 560.204, Florida Statutes…1) ATS’s fee was not prohibited under section 316.0083(b)(4) because the fee was not a “commission” …infraction detector” under Fla. Stat. § 316.0083(1)(b)(4)? b. Was the fee assessed …violation of Florida law, specifically, sections 316.0083(1)(b)4, 318.121, and 560.204, Florida Statutes

Luis Torres Jimenez v. State of Florida, etc.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2018-05-03T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 246 So. 3d 219

Snippet: .; § 316.0083(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2014). In addition to this grant of authority, section 316.0083(1)(a… light traffic infractions. Id. § 316.0083(1)(a). Section 316.0083(1)(a) also states: This paragraph…citation by a trained traffic enforcement officer. § 316.0083(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2014) (emphasis added). In …meaning of the word “review,” as used in section 316.0083(1)(a). The Third District Court of Appeal…light camera images authorized by section 316.0083(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2014), allow a municipality

City of Oldsmar v. Trinh

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2016-10-28T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 210 So. 3d 191, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 16012

Snippet: questions are as follows: 1. DOES SECTION 316.0083(l)(a) AUTHORIZE A MUNICIPALITY TO CONTRACT WITH…MUNICIPALITY? 2. DO SECTIONS 316.640(5)(a) AND 316.0083, FLORIDA STATUTES, PROHIBIT A MUNICIPALITY FROM… of s. 316.074(1) or s. 316.075(l)(c)l. § 316.0083 (emphasis added). A “traffic infraction detector…light camera program did not comply with sections 316.0083(l)(a) and 316.650(3)(c) 10 because …addition, “[although the legislature in section 316.0083(l)(a) did permit cities to delegate the

State Ex Rel. City of Aventura v. Jimenez

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2016-07-27T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 211 So. 3d 158, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 11373

Snippet: do so for the following reasons. First, section 316.0083 of the Florida Statutes authorizes, and provides…laws regulating conduct at traffic lights. See § 316.0083, Fla. Stat. (2010) (authorizing use of cameras… the traffic infraction enforcement officer. § 316.0083(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2015).4 In keeping with this…such ministerial acts are unauthorized by section 316.0083 would be akin to determining that a trial judge…appropriate parties. I also find no violation of section 316.0083 when American electronically “issues” a uniform

City of Fort Lauderdale v. June Dhar

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2016-02-25T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 185 So. 3d 1232, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 61, 2016 Fla. LEXIS 393, 2016 WL 743287

Snippet: the district court held a provision in section 316.0083(1)(d)3., Florida Statutes (2012), known as the…initially issued a notice of violation under section 316.0083(l)(b)l.a., Florida Statutes (2012), and therefore…The Fourth District correctly noted that section 316.0083(l)(d)3. was amended by the Legislature in 2013…we turn to. the statute at issue. Section 316.0083, Florida Statutes, also known as the Mark Wandall… Dhar committed the traffic violation, section 316.0083(1), Florida Statutes, provided in pertinent'

Clark v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2015-05-29T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 170 So. 3d 69, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 8188, 2015 WL 2458128

Snippet: issued a traffic citation pursuant to section 316.0083, Florida Statutes (2012), known as the Mark Wandall…the evidence,1 claiming that pursuant to section 316.0083(l)(e), Florida Statutes (2012),2 authentication…the circuit court erred in interpreting section 316.0083(l)(e), Florida Statutes (2012), to provide that…there is nothing in the plain language of section 316.0083(l)(e), Florida Statutes (2012), to indicate that…precedent to its admissibility.”). . Section 316.0083(l)(e), Florida Statutes (2012), provides, in full

City of Fort Lauderdale v. June Dhar

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2014-10-22T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 154 So. 3d 366, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 17154

Snippet: dismissing a traffic citation on grounds that section 316.0083(l)(d)3., Florida Statutes (2012), of the Mark …initially issued a notice of violation under section 316.0083(l)(b)l.a., Florida Statutes (2012), and therefore…1120 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014) (holding that “section 316.0083(l)(c)l.c, Florida Statutes (2011), did not violate…administrative efficiency.”). We noté that section 316.0083(l)(d)3. was amended by the legislature, effective

City of Hollywood, a political subdivision of the State of Florida v. Eric Arem

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2014-10-15T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 154 So. 3d 359, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 16790

Snippet: Procedure 9.160(d): 1. Does Florida Statute 316.0083(l)(a) authorize a municipality to delegate and…use of TIE Os to enforce red light violations. § 316.0083(1), Fla. Stat. (2011). The City operates a red…applicable statutes are clear and unambiguous. Section 316.0083(l)(a) provides, in pertinent part: A notice…traffic infraction enforcement officer. § 316.0083(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2011) (emphasis added). Section… If a traffic citation is issued under s. 316.0083, the traffic infraction enforcement officer

City of Fort Lauderdale v. Gonzalez

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2014-02-05T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 134 So. 3d 1119, 2014 WL 444171, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 1452

Snippet: Relevant Provisions of Section 316.0083, Florida Statutes Section 316.0083, Florida Statutes (2011), authorizes…traffic citation.” § 316.0083(l)(d)3., Fla. Stat. (2011). In sum, section 316.0083(l)(c)l.c., Florida Statutes…unconstitutional.1 We reverse and hold that section 316.0083(l)(e)l.c., Florida Statutes (2011), does not violate…the first registered owner of the vehicle. See § 316.0083(l)(c)l.a., c., Fla. Stat. (2011). The Uniform …captured by a traffic infraction detector. Section 316.0083(l)(b)l.a., Florida Statutes (2011), provides that

State v. Arrington

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2012-07-25T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 95 So. 3d 324, 2012 WL 3023203, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 12095

Snippet: offered the following rationale: Although [section] 316.0083[, Florida Statutes (2010) ] prohibits the exact…concluded that continued enforcement of section 316.0083 renders section 316.075 unconstitutional by treating… unconstitutional because sections 316.075 and 316.0083 do not apply to similarly-situated people. Therefore…....” § 316.075(4), Fla. Stat. (2010). Section 316.0083 also imposes a penalty for failure to stop at … and the issuance of a traffic citation. *327§ 316.0083(1)(b)1.a, Fla. Stat. (2010) (emphasis added).

City of Orlando v. Udowychenko

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2012-07-06T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 98 So. 3d 589, 2012 WL 2600293, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 10875

Snippet: and highways under their jurisdiction under s. 316.0083.” The Act implemented a statewide red light enforcement…signal steady red light. Any notification under s. 316.0083(l)(b) or traffic citation issued by the use of

Sunbelt Environmental, Inc. v. Gulf Coast Truck & Equipment Co.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2012-03-19T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 82 So. 3d 1196, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 4278, 2012 WL 896501

Snippet: acts of Sunbelt's driver violated sections 316.083 and 316.185, Florida Statutes (2006), by failing

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 2010-08-26T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: See s. 316.0083(b)1.b., Fla. Stat. 7 Section 316.0083(1)(c)1.c., Fla. Stat. 8 Section 316.0083(1)(c)1.…Section 316.0083(1)(c)1.c., Fla. Stat. 11 Section 316.0083(1)(d)2., Fla. Stat. Andsee s. 316.0083(1)(d)4…and highways under their jurisdiction under s. 316.0083. Only a municipality may install or authorize …for enforcement of the act is provided. Section 316.0083(1)(b), Florida Statutes, provides that within …, a traffic citation shall be issued.8 Section 316.0083(1)(c)1.d., Florida Statutes, requires that "

Broward County v. Brooks Builders, Inc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2005-07-27T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 908 So. 2d 536

Snippet: $266,128.92 3 08-21-00 $137,316.83 4 09-06-00 $143,008.58

In RE AMENDMENTS TO RULES REGULATING THE FLA. BAR-1-3.1 (A) AND RULES OF JUDICIAL ADMIN.-2.065 (LEGAL AID)

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1990-12-12T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 573 So. 2d 800

Snippet: 1979), appeal dismissed, 469 U.S. 925, 105 S.Ct. 316, 83 L.Ed.2d 254 (1984), and The Florida Bar: In re

State v. Lee

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1978-02-22T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 356 So. 2d 276

Snippet: 316.0565, 316.057(9), 316.061, 316.081, 316.082, 316.083, 316.084, 316.085, 316.086, 316.087, 316.088, 316.089

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 1977-07-13T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: 316.0565, 316.057(9), 316.061, 316.081, 316.082, 316.083, 316.084, 316.085, 316.086, 316.087, 316.088,

Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. v. Duval Cty.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1934-03-09T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 154 So. 331, 114 Fla. 254, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1819

Snippet: . W. R. Co. v. City of Connersville, 170 Ind. 316, 83 N.E. 503, affirmed218 U.S. 336, 31 Sup. Ct. Rep