Notes of Decisions
Cited in
19
cases (
3 in the last 5 years), 1983–2025 · leading case:
Bischoff v. Florida, 242 F. Supp. 2d 1226 (M.D. Fla. 2003).
Bischoff v. Florida, 242 F. Supp. 2d 1226 (M.D. Fla. 2003).
· cites it 123× “The Sheriffs Office charged them with violating Fla. Stat. §§ 316.2045 (2) (obstruction of traffic to solicit without a permit) and 316.”
Underwood v. State, 801 So. 2d 200 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).
· cites it 8× “2045, Florida Statutes, is entitled, "Obstruction of public streets, highways, and roads," and provides in pertinent part the following: It is unlawful for any person or persons willfully to obstruct the free, convenient and normal use of any public street, highway, or road by…”
Thunderbird Drive-In Theatre, Inc. v. REED ex rel. REED, 571 So. 2d 1341 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).
· cites it 4× “In addition to the charges of negligent design and operation of the theatre entrance, Reed contended that the resulting traffic congestion on Sunrise Boulevard without hiring any police personnel to improve traffic flow constitutes a violation of section 316.2045(1), Florida…”
Koppelman v. State, 876 So. 2d 618 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004).
· cites it 3× “Section 316.2045, "Obstruction of public streets, highways, and roads," provides the following: It is unlawful for any person or persons willfully to obstruct the free, convenient and normal use of any public street, highway, or road by impeding, hindering, stifling, retarding,…”
C.W. v. State, 76 So. 3d 1093 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011).
· cites it 10× “2 The underlying basis for the arrest was the alleged disorderly conduct, which in turn arose from an uncharged violation of section 316.2045, Florida Statutes (2010), a pedestrian infraction for obstructing traffic.”
Hernandez v. State, 784 So. 2d 1124 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999).
· cites it 3× “Section 316.2045 provides: It is unlawful for any person or persons willfully to obstruct the free, convenient, and normal use of any public street, highway, or road by impeding, hindering, stifling, retarding, or restraining traffic or passage thereon, by standing or…”
Bolton v. Smythe, 432 So. 2d 129 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983).
· cites it 3× “We also think Count II of the Third Amended Complaint stated a prima facie case of negligence against Smythe for violating a traffic statute (section 316.2045(1), Florida Statutes (1981)) and thereby causing an accident and injury to a person *131 using the roadway.”
Vigue v. Shoar, 494 F. Supp. 3d 1204 (M.D. Fla. 2020).
· cites it 82× “2045(2)–(4) contain exceptions to the permitting requirement for Internal Revenue Code § 501(c)(3) registered organizations and for political campaigning.”
Currie v. Palm Beach Cnty., 578 So. 2d 760 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991).
· cites it 2× “On cross appeal, appellee suggests that it was error to instruct the jury *765 that it might consider violation of section 316.2045(1), Florida Statutes (1981), as evidence of negligence.”
Jones v. State, 842 So. 2d 889 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003).
· cites it 2× “The State argues that the police had probable cause that Jones violated section 316.2045(1), Florida Statutes (2001), which prohibits willfully obstructing "the free, convenient, and normal use of any public street, highway, or road by impeding, hindering, stifling, retarding,…”
Reid v. State, 898 So. 2d 248 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005).
“NOTES [1] The officer stopped appellant for willfully blocking traffic in violation of Florida Statutes section 316.2045, which states in pertinent part: (1) It is unlawful for any person or persons willfully to obstruct the free, convenient, and normal use of any public street,…”
Barrier v. Duncan, 541 So. 2d 631 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989).
· cites it 2× “[§ 316.2045, Fla. Stat. (1985).] The foregoing instructions constitute a correct statement of the law of Florida regarding stopping on the highway.”
316.2045(1): 12 cases
Underwood v. State, 801 So. 2d 200 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).
“2045, Florida Statutes, is entitled, "Obstruction of public streets, highways, and roads," and provides in pertinent part the following: It is unlawful for any person or persons willfully to obstruct the free, convenient and normal use of any public street, highway, or road by…”
Thunderbird Drive-In Theatre, Inc. v. REED ex rel. REED, 571 So. 2d 1341 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).
“In addition to the charges of negligent design and operation of the theatre entrance, Reed contended that the resulting traffic congestion on Sunrise Boulevard without hiring any police personnel to improve traffic flow constitutes a violation of section 316.2045(1), Florida…”
Koppelman v. State, 876 So. 2d 618 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004).
“Section 316.2045, "Obstruction of public streets, highways, and roads," provides the following: It is unlawful for any person or persons willfully to obstruct the free, convenient and normal use of any public street, highway, or road by impeding, hindering, stifling, retarding,…”
Bolton v. Smythe, 432 So. 2d 129 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983).
“We also think Count II of the Third Amended Complaint stated a prima facie case of negligence against Smythe for violating a traffic statute (section 316.2045(1), Florida Statutes (1981)) and thereby causing an accident and injury to a person *131 using the roadway.”
Hernandez v. State, 784 So. 2d 1124 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999).
“Section 316.2045 provides: It is unlawful for any person or persons willfully to obstruct the free, convenient, and normal use of any public street, highway, or road by impeding, hindering, stifling, retarding, or restraining traffic or passage thereon, by standing or…”
316.2045(1)(a): 1 case
Vigue v. Shoar, 494 F. Supp. 3d 1204 (M.D. Fla. 2020).
“2045(2)–(4) contain exceptions to the permitting requirement for Internal Revenue Code § 501(c)(3) registered organizations and for political campaigning.”
316.2045(1)(a)(1): 1 case
316.2045(1)(a)(2): 1 case
316.2045(2): 2 cases
Bischoff v. Florida, 242 F. Supp. 2d 1226 (M.D. Fla. 2003).
“The Sheriffs Office charged them with violating Fla. Stat. §§ 316.2045 (2) (obstruction of traffic to solicit without a permit) and 316.”
Vigue v. Shoar, 494 F. Supp. 3d 1204 (M.D. Fla. 2020).
“2045(2)–(4) contain exceptions to the permitting requirement for Internal Revenue Code § 501(c)(3) registered organizations and for political campaigning.”
316.2045(3): 2 cases
Bischoff v. Florida, 242 F. Supp. 2d 1226 (M.D. Fla. 2003).
“The Sheriffs Office charged them with violating Fla. Stat. §§ 316.2045 (2) (obstruction of traffic to solicit without a permit) and 316.”
Vigue v. Shoar, 494 F. Supp. 3d 1204 (M.D. Fla. 2020).
“2045(2)–(4) contain exceptions to the permitting requirement for Internal Revenue Code § 501(c)(3) registered organizations and for political campaigning.”
316.2045(4): 2 cases
Bischoff v. Florida, 242 F. Supp. 2d 1226 (M.D. Fla. 2003).
“The Sheriffs Office charged them with violating Fla. Stat. §§ 316.2045 (2) (obstruction of traffic to solicit without a permit) and 316.”
Vigue v. Shoar, 494 F. Supp. 3d 1204 (M.D. Fla. 2020).
“2045(2)–(4) contain exceptions to the permitting requirement for Internal Revenue Code § 501(c)(3) registered organizations and for political campaigning.”
316.2045(5): 1 case
Vigue v. Shoar, 494 F. Supp. 3d 1204 (M.D. Fla. 2020).
“2045(2)–(4) contain exceptions to the permitting requirement for Internal Revenue Code § 501(c)(3) registered organizations and for political campaigning.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.