316.222
Stop lamps and turn signals.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
316.222 Stop lamps and turn signals.—
(1) Every motor vehicle, trailer, semitrailer, and pole trailer shall be equipped with two or more stop lamps meeting the requirements of s. 316.234(1). Motor vehicles, trailers, semitrailers and pole trailers manufactured or assembled prior to January 1, 1972, shall be equipped with at least one stop lamp. On a combination of vehicles, only the stop lamps on the rearmost vehicle need actually be seen from the distance specified in s. 316.234(1).
(2) Every motor vehicle, trailer, semitrailer, and pole trailer shall be equipped with electric turn signal lamps meeting the requirements of s. 316.234(2).
(3) Passenger cars and trucks less than 80 inches in width, manufactured or assembled prior to January 1, 1972, need not be equipped with electric turn signal lamps.
(4) A violation of this section is a noncriminal traffic infraction, punishable as a nonmoving violation as provided in chapter 318.
History.—s. 1, ch. 71-135; s. 174, ch. 99-248.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases, 1992–2016 · leading case: State v. Perez-Garcia
State v. Perez-Garcia (2005)
“Perez-Garcia argued below and reiterates here that because Florida law, as he construes it, merely requires a motor vehicle in this state be "equipped with two or more stop lamps," see § 316.222(1), Fla. Stat. (2003), and because his vehicle literally complied with section 316.”
Doctor v. State (1992)
“§ 316.222 (stop lamps and turn signals); id.”
Hilton v. State (2005)
“221, which requires every vehicle to have two taillights visible for 1,000 feet, and inoperable brake lights contrary to section 316.222, which requires two brake lights visible for 300 feet.”
State v. Burger (2006)
“Burger's car for a violation of section 316.222(1), Florida Statutes (2004), which requires "[e]very motor vehicle .”
May v. State (2012)
“The detective testified that pain clinics change their mode of operation whenever they become aware of being watched.”
United States v. Brian Mackey (2005)
“” Fla. Stat. Ann. § 316.222 . It is a violation of Florida law to operate a vehicle that is not equipped with two or more functional stop lamps.”
Classy Cycles, Inc. v. Bay County (2016)
“221 (tail-lamps), § 316.222 (stop lamps and turn signals), § 316.”
Zarba v. State (2007)
“This court held that if two of the vehicle's three brake lights were operational, this was sufficient to comply with the requirements of section 316.222(1), Florida Statutes (2004).”
— 316.222(1) — 3 cases
State v. Perez-Garcia (2005)
“Perez-Garcia argued below and reiterates here that because Florida law, as he construes it, merely requires a motor vehicle in this state be "equipped with two or more stop lamps," see § 316.222(1), Fla. Stat. (2003), and because his vehicle literally complied with section 316.”
State v. Burger (2006)
“Burger's car for a violation of section 316.222(1), Florida Statutes (2004), which requires "[e]very motor vehicle .”
Zarba v. State (2007)
“This court held that if two of the vehicle's three brake lights were operational, this was sufficient to comply with the requirements of section 316.222(1), Florida Statutes (2004).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.