Notes of Decisions
Cited in
31
cases (
1 in the last 5 years), 1979–2022 · leading case:
Stoletz v. State, 875 So. 2d 572 (Fla. 2004).
Stoletz v. State, 875 So. 2d 572 (Fla. 2004).
· cites it 26× “4th DCA 2001), wherein the Fourth District concluded that the defendant's driver's license could not be permanently revoked for a second DUI conviction under section 316.655 because the more specific statute, section 322.”
Whipple v. State, 789 So. 2d 1132 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).
· cites it 8× “The trial court erroneously revoked appellant's driving privileges pursuant to section 316.655, Florida Statutes (1999).”
Bischoff v. Florida, 242 F. Supp. 2d 1226 (M.D. Fla. 2003).
· cites it 4× “2045 (1); Fla. Stat. § 316.655 (1); Fla. Stat. § 318.”
State v. Champe, 373 So. 2d 874 (Fla. 1979).
· cites it 2× “25, Florida Statutes (1977), cannot constitutionally be levied on civil penalties (as opposed to criminal fines), the state asks: Are the penalties imposed for traffic infractions under §§ 316.655 and 318.18, Florida Statutes, to be considered as "fines" or "civil penalties"…”
Cheatem v. State, 416 So. 2d 35 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982).
· cites it 3× “026, which subsequently became section 316.655, was also enacted. [3] Appellant points out that when the city adopted chapter 316, the relevant statutes were sections 316.”
Gasset v. State, 490 So. 2d 97 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986).
“, it chose to maintain criminal sanctions for certain serious traffic offenses, including reckless driving and fleeing or eluding an officer, see § 316.655(1), (4), Fla. Stat. (1985), thereby indicating the state's view of the seriousness of these offenses and the state's…”
City of Aventura v. Masone, 89 So. 3d 233 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011).
· cites it 2× “(2) Section 316.655 provides that all traffic infractions be punished under the provisions of chapter 318, and section 318.”
Stoletz v. State, 842 So. 2d 866 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003).
· cites it 7× “Whipple’s driver’s license after his second DUI conviction under section 316.655, because the more specific statute, section 322.”
Lewek v. State, 702 So. 2d 527 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997).
“1994); see also §§ 316.655, 322.26(8), 322.27(2), 322.28(2), 322.”
Whirley v. State, 450 So. 2d 836 (Fla. 1984).
“08(2), which excepted from the definition of "misdemeanor," "any violation of any provision of chapter 316" and section 316.655, which read in pertinent part: (1) A violation of any of the provisions of this chapter, except criminal offenses enumerated in section (4), shall be…”
State v. Smith, 584 So. 2d 145 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).
· cites it 2× “See § 316.655, Fla. Stat. (1989). See also Ch.”
Houle v. State, 33 So. 3d 822 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).
· cites it 2× “The trial court, however, revoked appellant’s driving privileges pursuant to section 316.655(2), not section 322.28(4)(a).”
316.655(1): 5 cases
Cheatem v. State, 416 So. 2d 35 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982).
“026, which subsequently became section 316.655, was also enacted. [3] Appellant points out that when the city adopted chapter 316, the relevant statutes were sections 316.”
Gasset v. State, 490 So. 2d 97 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986).
“, it chose to maintain criminal sanctions for certain serious traffic offenses, including reckless driving and fleeing or eluding an officer, see § 316.655(1), (4), Fla. Stat. (1985), thereby indicating the state's view of the seriousness of these offenses and the state's…”
316.655(1)(3): 1 case
316.655(2): 6 cases
Stoletz v. State, 875 So. 2d 572 (Fla. 2004).
“4th DCA 2001), wherein the Fourth District concluded that the defendant's driver's license could not be permanently revoked for a second DUI conviction under section 316.655 because the more specific statute, section 322.”
State v. Champe, 373 So. 2d 874 (Fla. 1979).
“25, Florida Statutes (1977), cannot constitutionally be levied on civil penalties (as opposed to criminal fines), the state asks: Are the penalties imposed for traffic infractions under §§ 316.655 and 318.18, Florida Statutes, to be considered as "fines" or "civil penalties"…”
Stoletz v. State, 842 So. 2d 866 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003).
“Whipple’s driver’s license after his second DUI conviction under section 316.655, because the more specific statute, section 322.”
Houle v. State, 33 So. 3d 822 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).
“The trial court, however, revoked appellant’s driving privileges pursuant to section 316.655(2), not section 322.28(4)(a).”
316.655(3): 1 case
316.655(4): 2 cases
316.655(4)(f): 2 cases
316.655(5): 2 cases
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.