Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 319.20 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 319.20 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 319.20

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXIII
MOTOR VEHICLES
Chapter 319
TITLE CERTIFICATES
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 319.20
319.20 Application of law.Except as otherwise specifically provided, this chapter applies exclusively to motor vehicles and mobile homes required to be registered and licensed under the laws of this state and defined by such registration laws, including residential manufactured buildings placed on mobile home lots under s. 553.382. A residential manufactured building placed on a mobile home lot as provided in s. 553.382 shall be treated as a mobile home for purposes of this chapter. The provisions of this chapter do not apply to any moped or to any trailer or semitrailer having a net weight of less than 2,000 pounds. All provisions of this chapter relating to title certificates also apply to any recreational vehicle-type unit and to any mobile home classified and taxed as real property pursuant to s. 320.0815(2); and no title, lien, or other interest in such vehicle or mobile home shall be valid unless evidenced in accordance with this chapter.
History.s. 1, ch. 23658, 1947; s. 6, ch. 65-190; s. 1, ch. 65-447; s. 4, ch. 82-134; s. 7, ch. 2015-163.

F.S. 319.20 on Google Scholar

F.S. 319.20 on Casetext

Amendments to 319.20


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 319.20
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 319.20.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 319.20

Total Results: 20

Leo L. Boatman v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2024-10-17T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: decision. See, e.g., Lynch v. State, 254 So. 3d 312, 319-20 (Fla. 2018) (concluding that, based on the “extensive

ROBERT E. GREATHOUSE v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2023-09-27T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: of preservation. See Carratelli, 961 So. 2d at 319–20 ("Even where the reviewing court concludes

RICHARD BENNETT v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2022-11-29T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: U.S. at 661 (quoting Melendez–Diaz, 557 U.S. at 319-20 n.6). However, subsequent cases established

Gary Michael Hilton v. State of Florida & Gary Michael Hilton v. Mark S. Inch, etc.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2021-08-26T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: improper if the error has not been preserved. Id. at 319- 20 (citing Singer v. State, 109 So. 2d 7, 19 (Fla

VICTOR MALDONADO v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2021-05-12T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: prejudice. See Thompson v. State, 88 So. 3d 312, 319-20 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012). As to ground three, however

KENNETH DEVINO and 2436 EAST LAS OLAS BLVD. STORES, LLC v. 2426 EAST LAS OLAS, LLC

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2020-11-03T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: Baptist Hosp. of Fla. Inc. v. Welker, 908 So. 2d 317, 319-20 (Fla. 2005). In Palm Beach County v. Cove Club

Del Pino Allen v. Santelises

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2019-02-26T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: State Univ. Bd. of Trs. v. Monk, 68 So. 3d 316, 319-20 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) (“Inasmuch as producing and

WALTER B. OLSON, JR. v. CYNTHIA ANN OLSON

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2018-11-14T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 260 So. 3d 367

Snippet: Orkin Extermination Co. v. Tfank, 766 So. 2d 318, 319-20 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). As we have said many times

Richard C. Solomon v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2018-08-27T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: concurrently. See Valentin v. State, 963 So. 2d 317, 319-20 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007) (recognizing that “the imposition

Marlene Altemar v. Lifespace Communities, and Communities, etc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2018-07-09T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: ’s Home Ctrs., Inc. v. Beekman, 187 So. 3d 318, 319-20 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016) (holding that unsolicited opinions

State of Florida v. Joseph P. Smith

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2018-04-05T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 251 So. 3d 807

Snippet: dissenting. *811See Pagan v. State , 235 So.3d 317, 319-20 (Fla. 2018) (Lawson, J., dissenting). SC17

Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. Duignan

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2017-11-14T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: quoting 12 Ruling Case Law, Fraud and Deceit § 80, 319-20 (William M. McKinney & Burdette A. Rich, eds

Butner v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2017-04-28T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 217 So. 3d 1162, 2017 WL 1534812, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 5899

Snippet: one victim.” Valentin v. State, 963 So.2d 317, 319-20 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007) (citations omitted); see also

Progressive American Insurance Co. v. Eduardo J. Garrido D.C. P.A., Etc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2017-02-15T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 211 So. 3d 1086, 2017 WL 621239, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 1993

Snippet: citing Heller v. Doe, 509 U.S. 312, 319-20, 113 S.Ct. 2637, 125 L.Ed.2d 257 (1993). Some measure

Michael L. King v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2017-01-26T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 211 So. 3d 866, 42 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 67, 2017 WL 372081, 2017 Fla. LEXIS 191

Snippet: improper juror is not considered reversible. Id. at 319-20 (citing Busby v. State, 894 So.2d 88, 96-97 (Fla

Pedro Fajardo v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2016-06-08T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 193 So. 3d 1019, 2016 WL 3176968, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 8824

Snippet: prejudice. See, e.g., Davis, 415 U.S. at 319-20, 94 S.Ct. 1105 (commenting that whatever temporary

Ronald Williams v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2016-03-03T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 186 So. 3d 989, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 73, 2016 Fla. LEXIS 456

Snippet: 45; see also Valentin v. State, 963 ’So.2d 317, 319-20 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007) (“[T]he imposition of consecutive

Louidor v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2015-03-25T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 162 So. 3d 305, 2015 WL 1313104

Snippet: Sheppard as agreed to by the defense. See infra pp. 319-20, n. 13. The Sheppard opinion, however, merely states…evidence at the trial,” we disagree. See infra pp. 319-20, n. 13. While simply failing to object to the admission…indisputably should have been excluded.” See infra pp. 319-20, n. 13. In addition to the evidence already discussed

State of Florida v. Thomas D. Woodel

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2014-06-05T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 145 So. 3d 782, 39 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 383, 2014 WL 2532480, 2014 Fla. LEXIS 1808

Snippet: dresser. Woodel v. State (Woodel I), 804 So.2d 316, 319-20 (Fla.2001). The jury voted twelve to zero for Mrs

Delong v. Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2014-05-28T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 145 So. 3d 123, 38 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 700, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 8115, 2014 WL 2199805

Snippet: employees. See Fla. Nurses Ass’n, 508 So.2d at 319-20. The Legislature’s past practice clearly suggests