Notes of Decisions
Cited in
91
cases (
5 in the last 5 years), 1952–2026 · leading case:
In Re Daniels, 309 B.R. 54 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2004).
In Re Daniels, 309 B.R. 54 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2004).
· cites it 14× “2 Section 319.22 of the Florida Statutes does not provide any help in resolving this ambiguity; the statute only addresses transfers of vehicles with titles separating co-owners with the words “and” or “or.”
Woodard v. Chesley (In re Chesley), 550 B.R. 903 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2016).
· cites it 45× “3 They argue that, as a matter of Florida law, only the registered title holder can be the owner, citing Fla. Stat. § 319.22 (1). 4 They contend that if Debtor was not the registered title holder on the petition date, the Motorcy- *906 ele did not become property of the…”
In Re Orange Rose, LLC, 446 B.R. 543 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2011).
· cites it 19× “The parties are ordered to meet and confer, or alternatively, schedule mediation before the next scheduled hearing.”
Vic Potamkin Chevrolet, Inc. v. Horne, 505 So. 2d 560 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).
· cites it 7× “3d DCA 1969); § 319.22(2), Fla. Stat. (1985). A seller of a product can only be held liable if (1) the injury caused by the product could reasonably have been expected to occur either because of its inherently dangerous nature, see, e.”
Horne v. Vic Potamkin Chevrolet, Inc., 533 So. 2d 261 (Fla. 1988).
· cites it 7× “Section 319.22(2), Florida Statutes (1981), provides in pertinent part that the seller of a motor vehicle who has made a bona fide sale or transfer .”
Bowen v. Taylor-Christensen, 98 So. 3d 136 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012).
· cites it 14× “It concluded that, although a transfer of ownership using the formalities contained in section 319.22, would, as the statute states, terminate the transfer- or’s liability, the statutory method of transfer was not intended to be exclusive.”
Bell-Tel Fed. Credit Union v. Kalter, 292 F.3d 1350 (11th Cir. 2002).
· cites it 3× “See Fla. Stat. § 319.22 . 6 If the vehicle at issue has been repossessed or otherwise transferred by operation of law, however, the statute provides an exception, allowing the party possessing the vehicle to obtain a certificate of title from the Florida Department of Highway…”
Lámar v. Wheels Unlimited, Inc., 513 So. 2d 135 (Fla. 1987).
· cites it 7× “The district court of appeal reasoned that section 319.22, Florida Statutes (1985), dealing with the transfer of title to motor vehicles, was not calculated to prohibit courts from recognizing equitable interests which were not asserted in opposition to the rights of good faith…”
Palmer v. RS Evans, Jacksonville, Inc., 81 So. 2d 635 (Fla. 1955).
· cites it 6× “It is contended here that the disposition of the issue of ownership below was error, mainly because of the trial court's refusal to charge that if the jury found F.S. § 319.22, F.S.A. (pertaining to endorsement and delivery of title certificate) had not been complied with by…”
Amsouth Bank of Florida v. Hepner, 647 So. 2d 907 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).
· cites it 8× “Since amendment of section 319.22, Florida Statutes, by chapter 79-333, section 1, at 1736, Laws of Florida, one spouse can transfer title *910 to an automobile without the other spouse's consent, if the title is in both names disjunctively.”
— 319.22(1) — 29 cases
Lámar v. Wheels Unlimited, Inc., 513 So. 2d 135 (Fla. 1987).
“The district court of appeal reasoned that section 319.22, Florida Statutes (1985), dealing with the transfer of title to motor vehicles, was not calculated to prohibit courts from recognizing equitable interests which were not asserted in opposition to the rights of good faith…”
Woodard v. Chesley (In re Chesley), 550 B.R. 903 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2016).
“3 They argue that, as a matter of Florida law, only the registered title holder can be the owner, citing Fla. Stat. § 319.22 (1). 4 They contend that if Debtor was not the registered title holder on the petition date, the Motorcy- *906 ele did not become property of the…”
— 319.22(2) — 21 cases
Vic Potamkin Chevrolet, Inc. v. Horne, 505 So. 2d 560 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).
“3d DCA 1969); § 319.22(2), Fla. Stat. (1985). A seller of a product can only be held liable if (1) the injury caused by the product could reasonably have been expected to occur either because of its inherently dangerous nature, see, e.”
Horne v. Vic Potamkin Chevrolet, Inc., 533 So. 2d 261 (Fla. 1988).
“Section 319.22(2), Florida Statutes (1981), provides in pertinent part that the seller of a motor vehicle who has made a bona fide sale or transfer .”
Bowen v. Taylor-Christensen, 98 So. 3d 136 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012).
“It concluded that, although a transfer of ownership using the formalities contained in section 319.22, would, as the statute states, terminate the transfer- or’s liability, the statutory method of transfer was not intended to be exclusive.”
— 319.22(2)(a) — 7 cases
Amsouth Bank of Florida v. Hepner, 647 So. 2d 907 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).
“Since amendment of section 319.22, Florida Statutes, by chapter 79-333, section 1, at 1736, Laws of Florida, one spouse can transfer title *910 to an automobile without the other spouse's consent, if the title is in both names disjunctively.”
Bowen v. Taylor-Christensen, 98 So. 3d 136 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012).
“It concluded that, although a transfer of ownership using the formalities contained in section 319.22, would, as the statute states, terminate the transfer- or’s liability, the statutory method of transfer was not intended to be exclusive.”
— 319.22(2)(a)(1)(a) — 1 case
— 319.22(2)(a)(2) — 1 case
In Re Daniels, 309 B.R. 54 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2004).
“2 Section 319.22 of the Florida Statutes does not provide any help in resolving this ambiguity; the statute only addresses transfers of vehicles with titles separating co-owners with the words “and” or “or.”
— 319.22(2)(a)(l) — 2 cases
In Re Daniels, 309 B.R. 54 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2004).
“2 Section 319.22 of the Florida Statutes does not provide any help in resolving this ambiguity; the statute only addresses transfers of vehicles with titles separating co-owners with the words “and” or “or.”
— 319.22(2)(a)(l)(a) — 1 case
— 319.22(2)(b) — 1 case
— 319.22(5) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.