Florida Statute 322.23 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXIII
MOTOR VEHICLES

Chapter 322
DRIVER LICENSES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 322.23

322.23 Suspending privileges of nonresidents and reporting convictions.—

(1) The privilege of driving a motor vehicle on the highways of this state, given to a nonresident, shall be subject to suspension or revocation by the department in the same manner and for the same cause as a license issued by the department may be suspended or revoked.

(2) The department is authorized, upon receiving a record of the conviction in this state of a nonresident driver, of any offense under the motor vehicle laws of this state, to forward a certified copy of such record to the motor vehicle administrator in the state wherein the person so convicted is a resident.

History.—s. 35, ch. 19551, 1939; CGL 1940 Supp. 4151(649); s. 35, ch. 20451, 1941.

F.S. 322.23 on Google Scholar

F.S. 322.23 on Casetext

Amendments to 322.23

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 322.23

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 322.23.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 322.23

Total Results: 20

Gessner v. Southern Company and Gulf Power Company

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-11-20

Snippet: (quoting Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322–23 (1986)). To survive summary judgment, Appellant

David A. Casey and Joan Quinn Casey v. Mistral Condominium Association, Inc.: Dolphin Developers, LLC Panhandle Getaways

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-03-06

Snippet: raised by the nonmoving party. Celotex, 477 U.S. at 322–23 (citations omitted):

DEWAYNE FLOWERS v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-02-02

Snippet: frivolous.”); see also State v. Causey, 503 So. 2d 321, 322–23 (Fla. 1987) (“While courts should not assume the

THOMAS L. RHYMESTINE v. THE DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF MIAMI DADE COLLEGE, FLORIDA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-03-29

Snippet: trial. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322-23 (1986). If, however, Rhymestine presented evidence

DAROUS JAMES BUSH vs STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-01-20

Snippet: harmless error. See State v. Causey, 503 So. 2d 321, 322–23 (Fla. 1987) (“While courts should not assume the

MARTIN J. ZARCADOOLAS v. GREGORY TONY, as Sheriff of Broward County

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-01-04

Snippet: Campbell v. Racetrack Bingo, Inc., 75 So. 3d 321, 322–23 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) (affirming an order finding

RONALD DUBUC vs STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2022-08-19

Snippet: the record. See State v. Causey, 503 So. 2d 321, 322–23 (Fla. 1987) (holding that once appointed counsel

B. M. v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-11-06

Snippet: circumstances, in Sinkfield v. State, 592 So. 2d 322, 322–23 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), the court reversed Sinkfield's

Roger N. Rosier v. State of Florida

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-06-28

Snippet: that appears in the record. Causey, 503 So. 2d at 322–23 (“While courts should not assume the role of appellate

Abdo v. Abdo

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-12-21

Citation: 263 So. 3d 141

Snippet: in Florida under its corporate "guise." Id. at 322-23. The third-party plaintiffs alleged as follows:

Abdo v. Abdo

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-12-21

Citation: 263 So. 3d 141

Snippet: in Florida under its corporate "guise." Id. at 322-23. The third-party plaintiffs alleged as follows:

JOSEPH E. ABDO v. KHALIL ABDO

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-12-21

Snippet: Florida under its corporate "guise." Id. at 322-23. The third-party plaintiffs alleged as follows:

Gabriel Brian Nock v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-11-01

Citation: 256 So. 3d 828

Snippet: left in the victim's car. Id. at 322-23 (some alterations in original). The Fourth

Richard E. Lynch v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-09-20

Citation: 254 So. 3d 312

Snippet: (1984), claims. See per curiam op. at 322-23. Thus, I concur in result. QUINCE, J., concurs

JAMES J. GIBSON & DR. LORI G. GIBSON v. WACHOVIA BANK

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-07-13

Citation: 255 So. 3d 944

Snippet: entireties."); accord In re Ascuntar, 487 B.R. 319, 322-23 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2013) (reasoning that the debtor

John Eugene Williams, III v. State of Florida

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-04-18

Citation: 244 So. 3d 356

Snippet: and their disrespect for the laws and orders); § 322.23(1), Fla. Stat. (2016) (stating, “[t]he privilege

The School Board of Hernando v. Michelle Rhea, Theresa Butler

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-03-07

Citation: 213 So. 3d 1032, 2017 WL 899897, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 3019

Snippet: Bailey Combined Shows, Inc. v. State, 295 So.2d 314, 322-23 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974). The school boards did neither

The School Board of Hernando v. Michelle Rhea, Theresa Butler

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-03-06

Snippet: Combined Shows, Inc. v. State, 295 So. 2d 314, 322–23 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974). The school boards did neither

Wolicki-Gables v. Doctors Same Day Surgery Center, Ltd.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-02-15

Citation: 216 So. 3d 665, 2017 WL 603316, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 1952

Snippet: went through the more exacting PMA process. Id. at 322-23, 128 S.Ct. 999. As noted earlier, PMA approval

Michael L. King v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-01-26

Citation: 211 So. 3d 866, 42 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 67, 2017 WL 372081, 2017 Fla. LEXIS 191

Snippet: timely notice of appeal. Carratelli, 961 So. 2d at 322-23. -