Notes of Decisions
Vargas v. Enter. Leasing Co., 993 So. 2d 614 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008).
· cites it 7× “021(9)(b) is in the financial responsibility chapter, we do not believe that the specific penalties provided for in section 324.051 apply. " [e.s.] Again their argument misstates Folmar .”
Williams v. Newton, 236 So. 2d 98 (Fla. 1970).
· cites it 11× “The trial court in declaring Florida Statutes § 324.051, F.S.A. unconstitutional, held: "* * * [W]ithout precise regard to the language in Section 324.”
Garcia Ex Rel. Est. of Garcia v. Vanguard Car Rental USA, Inc., 510 F. Supp. 2d 821 (M.D. Fla. 2007).
· cites it 2× “It is Fla. Stat. § 324.051 , for example, that achieves this object by authorizing the State to suspend the license and registration of a motor vehicle owner or operator who does not have the required minimum levels of motor vehicle insurance at the time of an accident.”
Howard v. Am. Serv. Mut. Ins. Co., 151 So. 2d 682 (Fla. 3d DCA 1963).
· cites it 4× “liability policy" will prevent suspension of the insured's license and registration; (2) if so, and the defendant's policy coverage, by its own terms, became extended so as to prevent such suspension, does this broadened coverage apply at the time of the accident so as to cover…”
Folmar v. Young, 560 So. 2d 798 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).
· cites it 4× “" The plaintiffs contend that the foregoing phrase relates only to the issue of whether the lessor is subject to the sanctions set forth in section 324.051. Such an argument requires this court once again to construe the foregoing statute, and we must look not only at the plain…”
Rosado v. Daimlerchrysler Fin. Servs. Trust, 1 So. 3d 1200 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009).
· cites it 4× “See § 324.051, Fla. Stat. (2008). *1208 The significance of Florida's financial responsibility statutes was altered and reduced with the creation of no-fault automobile insurance.”
Folmar v. Young, 591 So. 2d 220 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991).
· cites it 4× “" The plaintiffs contend that the foregoing phrase relates only to the issue of whether the lessor is subject to the sanctions set forth in section 324.051. Such an argument requires this court once again to construe the foregoing statute, and we must look not only at the plain…”
Johns v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 337 So. 2d 830 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976).
· cites it 2× “Appellee filed an affidavit of the Chief of the Financial Responsibility Bureau of the Department of Insurance to the effect that since § 324.051 exempted municipalities from having their operator's licenses and owners' registrations suspended within thirty days following notice…”
Lite v. State, 617 So. 2d 1058 (Fla. 1993).
“, §§ 324.051 and 324.121, Fla. Stat. (1989) (failure of automobile owner to have liability insurance even if owner is not involved in accident); § 322.”
Larson v. Warren, 132 So. 2d 177 (Fla. 1961).
· cites it 2× “See § 324.051, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., containing numerous *181 exemptions or exceptions.”
McKinney v. O'Malley, 379 F. Supp. 135 (M.D. Fla. 1974).
· cites it 6× “061, Florida Statutes, i rovides as follows: (1) Security deposited pursuant to the provisions of § 324.051 (2) (f) with respect to claims for injuries to i ersons or i roper-ties resulting from an accident occurring l rior to such deposit shall be in the form and amount…”
324.051(1)(a): 1 case
Vargas v. Enter. Leasing Co., 993 So. 2d 614 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008).
“021(9)(b) is in the financial responsibility chapter, we do not believe that the specific penalties provided for in section 324.051 apply. " [e.s.] Again their argument misstates Folmar .”
324.051(2): 6 cases
Williams v. Newton, 236 So. 2d 98 (Fla. 1970).
“The trial court in declaring Florida Statutes § 324.051, F.S.A. unconstitutional, held: "* * * [W]ithout precise regard to the language in Section 324.”
Howard v. Am. Serv. Mut. Ins. Co., 151 So. 2d 682 (Fla. 3d DCA 1963).
“liability policy" will prevent suspension of the insured's license and registration; (2) if so, and the defendant's policy coverage, by its own terms, became extended so as to prevent such suspension, does this broadened coverage apply at the time of the accident so as to cover…”
McKinney v. O'Malley, 379 F. Supp. 135 (M.D. Fla. 1974).
“061, Florida Statutes, i rovides as follows: (1) Security deposited pursuant to the provisions of § 324.051 (2) (f) with respect to claims for injuries to i ersons or i roper-ties resulting from an accident occurring l rior to such deposit shall be in the form and amount…”
324.051(2)(a): 2 cases
Vargas v. Enter. Leasing Co., 993 So. 2d 614 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008).
“021(9)(b) is in the financial responsibility chapter, we do not believe that the specific penalties provided for in section 324.051 apply. " [e.s.] Again their argument misstates Folmar .”
324.051(2)(b): 2 cases
Vargas v. Enter. Leasing Co., 993 So. 2d 614 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008).
“021(9)(b) is in the financial responsibility chapter, we do not believe that the specific penalties provided for in section 324.051 apply. " [e.s.] Again their argument misstates Folmar .”
324.051(4): 1 case
McKinney v. O'Malley, 379 F. Supp. 135 (M.D. Fla. 1974).
“061, Florida Statutes, i rovides as follows: (1) Security deposited pursuant to the provisions of § 324.051 (2) (f) with respect to claims for injuries to i ersons or i roper-ties resulting from an accident occurring l rior to such deposit shall be in the form and amount…”
324.051(b): 2 cases
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.