Arrestable Offenses under F.S. 316.066
M = misdemeanor · F = felony · degree: F=1st S=2nd T=3rd§316.066(3b)NONMOVING TRAFFIC VIOLRENUMBERED. SEE REC # 9476F · 3rd
§316.066(3b)INVADE PRIVACYDISCLOSE CONFID CRASH REPORT TO UNAUTH PERSONF · 3rd
§316.066(3c)NONMOVING TRAFFIC VIOLRENUMBERED. SEE REC # 9477F · 3rd
§316.066(3c)INVADE PRIVACYUNAUTH PERSON OBTAIN CONFIDENTIAL CRASH REPORTF · 3rd
§316.066(3d)PUBLIC ORDER CRIMESRENUMBERED. SEE REC# 6066F · 3rd
§316.066(3d)NONMOVING TRAFFIC VIOLRENUMBERED. SEE REC # 9478F · 3rd
§316.066(3d)INVADE PRIVACYUNLAWFUL USE CONFIDENTIAL CRASH REPORTF · 3rd
§316.066(3e)PUBLIC ORDER CRIMESRENUMBERED. SEE REC# 6067.F · 3rd
§316.066(3f)PUBLIC ORDER CRIMESRENUMBERED. SEE REC# 6068F · 3rd
§316.066(4b)TRAFFIC OFFENSERENUMBERED. SEE REC #7180F · 3rd
§316.066(4c)TRAFFIC OFFENSERENUMBERED. SEE REC #7181F · 3rd
§316.066(4d)TRAFFIC OFFENSERENUMBERED. SEE REC #7186F · 3rd
§316.066(6b)PUBLIC ORDER CRIMESRENUMBERED. SEE REC #7027F · 3rd
§316.066(6c)PUBLIC ORDER CRIMESRENUMBERED. SEE REC #7028F · 3rd
§316.066(6d)PUBLIC ORDER CRIMESRENUMBERED. SEE REC #7029F · 3rd
Civil Citations under F.S. 316.066
Driver's license points · R = revocation · S = suspension§316.066(1)(d)CRASH - Failure to provide proof of insurance (All parties)—
§316.066(1)(e)CRASH- Driver failure to make written crash report when not written by officer (0 >)—
§316.066(2)CRASH - Failure of Driver to submit SUPPLEMENTAL report of crash when required—
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
136
cases (
9 in the last 5 years), 1973–2026 · leading case:
State v. Marshall, 695 So. 2d 719 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996).
State v. Marshall, 695 So. 2d 719 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996).
· cites it 24× “The crux of the state's argument is that the legislature's 1991 amendments to chapter 316, Florida Statutes, [3] had the effect of eliminating any requirement for a citizen to make an accident report under section 316.”
Maddox v. State, 923 So. 2d 442 (Fla. 2006).
· cites it 6× “" § 316.066(4), Fla. Stat. (2001) (emphasis supplied).”
State v. Norstrom, 613 So. 2d 437 (Fla. 1993).
· cites it 13× “4th DCA 1991), in which the district court held that statements made by Norstrom, after he was informed of his Miranda [1] rights and signed a waiver form, were not admissible because the statements were made during the accident investigation phase of the incident and were,…”
Combs v. State, 436 So. 2d 93 (Fla. 1983).
· cites it 4× “The petitioner asserted that the circuit court departed from the essential requirements of law by affirming a judgment based upon statements admitted into evidence in violation of section 316.066. Petitioner correctly points out that the circuit judge was wrong in stating that…”
Brackin v. Boles, 452 So. 2d 540 (Fla. 1984).
· cites it 7× “The trial court ruled that this evidence was inadmissible under section 316.066, Florida Statutes (1981).”
Sottilaro v. Figueroa, 86 So. 3d 505 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012).
· cites it 7× “The legislature amended section 316.066 in 2011 and subsection (5) was renumbered and is now subsection (4).”
State v. Hepburn, 460 So. 2d 422 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984).
· cites it 10× “First, the lower court determined that appellee's statements are privileged under Section 316.066, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1982).”
State v. Cino, 931 So. 2d 164 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006).
· cites it 10× “Consequently, our Supreme Court has held that the statute “clothe[s] with statutory immunity only such statements and communications as the driver, owner, or occupant of a vehicle is compelled to make in order to comply with his or her statutory duty under section 316.066(1) and…”
State v. Edwards, 463 So. 2d 551 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985).
· cites it 9× “Edwards objected to this testimony claiming it was privileged and therefore inadmissible pursuant to section 316.066, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1982).”
State v. Ferguson, 405 So. 2d 294 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981).
· cites it 8× “1968), [while interpreting the substantially identical statutory predecessor of Section 316.066, Section 317.171, Florida Statutes (1967)]: And we think that these circumstances are ample to take the evidence of the results of the blood test out from under the protective cloak…”
Duval Motor Co. v. Woodward, 419 So. 2d 303 (Fla. 1982).
· cites it 9× “Section 316.066, Florida Statutes (1975), requires that the driver of a vehicle which is involved in an accident resulting in bodily injury forward a written report of such accident within 5 days thereafter to the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, but excuses that…”
Hendrix v. Evenflo Co., 255 F.R.D. 568 (N.D. Fla. 2009).
· cites it 2× “Evenflo also cites Florida’s statutory privilege concerning statements made for the purpose of preparing a traffic accident report, Fla. Stat. § 316.066 (7), for the astonishing proposition that an accident report may not be used in a trial.”
316.066(1): 18 cases
Sottilaro v. Figueroa, 86 So. 3d 505 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012).
“The legislature amended section 316.066 in 2011 and subsection (5) was renumbered and is now subsection (4).”
State v. Norstrom, 613 So. 2d 437 (Fla. 1993).
“4th DCA 1991), in which the district court held that statements made by Norstrom, after he was informed of his Miranda [1] rights and signed a waiver form, were not admissible because the statements were made during the accident investigation phase of the incident and were,…”
Brackin v. Boles, 452 So. 2d 540 (Fla. 1984).
“The trial court ruled that this evidence was inadmissible under section 316.066, Florida Statutes (1981).”
State v. Edwards, 463 So. 2d 551 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985).
“Edwards objected to this testimony claiming it was privileged and therefore inadmissible pursuant to section 316.066, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1982).”
316.066(3): 1 case
316.066(3)(a): 4 cases
Sottilaro v. Figueroa, 86 So. 3d 505 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012).
“The legislature amended section 316.066 in 2011 and subsection (5) was renumbered and is now subsection (4).”
316.066(3)(a)(1): 1 case
316.066(4): 91 cases
Maddox v. State, 923 So. 2d 442 (Fla. 2006).
“" § 316.066(4), Fla. Stat. (2001) (emphasis supplied).”
State v. Marshall, 695 So. 2d 719 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996).
“The crux of the state's argument is that the legislature's 1991 amendments to chapter 316, Florida Statutes, [3] had the effect of eliminating any requirement for a citizen to make an accident report under section 316.”
State v. Cino, 931 So. 2d 164 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006).
“Consequently, our Supreme Court has held that the statute “clothe[s] with statutory immunity only such statements and communications as the driver, owner, or occupant of a vehicle is compelled to make in order to comply with his or her statutory duty under section 316.066(1) and…”
State v. Hepburn, 460 So. 2d 422 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984).
“First, the lower court determined that appellee's statements are privileged under Section 316.066, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1982).”
State v. Ferguson, 405 So. 2d 294 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981).
“1968), [while interpreting the substantially identical statutory predecessor of Section 316.066, Section 317.171, Florida Statutes (1967)]: And we think that these circumstances are ample to take the evidence of the results of the blood test out from under the protective cloak…”
316.066(5): 1 case
Sottilaro v. Figueroa, 86 So. 3d 505 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012).
“The legislature amended section 316.066 in 2011 and subsection (5) was renumbered and is now subsection (4).”
316.066(7): 5 cases
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.