Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

You're probably overthinking it. Call a lawyer.

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 327.44 - Full Text and Legal Analysis Florida Statute 327.44 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Fla. Stat. § 327.44 (2026) Copy Cite Official Site Syfertize CourtListener Amendments
327.44 Interference with navigation; relocation or removal; recovery of costs.
(1) As used in this section, the term:
(a) “Gross negligence” means conduct so reckless or wanting in care that it constitutes a conscious disregard or indifference to the safety of the property exposed to such conduct.
(b) “Willful misconduct” means conduct evidencing carelessness or negligence of such a degree or recurrence as to manifest culpability, wrongful intent, or evil design or to show an intentional and substantial disregard of the interests of the vessel owner.
(2) A person may not anchor, moor, or allow to be anchored or moored, except in case of emergency, or operate a vessel or carry on any prohibited activity in a manner which unreasonably or unnecessarily constitutes a navigational hazard or interference with another vessel. Anchoring or mooring under bridges or in or adjacent to heavily traveled channels constitutes interference if unreasonable under the prevailing circumstances.
(3) The commission, officers of the commission, and any law enforcement agency or officer specified in s. 327.70 are authorized and empowered to relocate, remove, or cause to be relocated or removed a vessel that unreasonably or unnecessarily constitutes a navigational hazard or interferes with another vessel. The commission, officers of the commission, or any other law enforcement agency or officer acting under this subsection to relocate, remove, or cause to be relocated or removed a vessel that unreasonably or unnecessarily constitutes a navigational hazard or interferes with another vessel shall be held harmless for all damages to the vessel resulting from such relocation or removal unless the damage results from gross negligence or willful misconduct.
(4) A contractor performing relocation or removal activities at the direction of the commission, officers of the commission, or a law enforcement agency or officer pursuant to this section must be licensed in accordance with applicable United States Coast Guard regulations where required; obtain and carry in full force and effect a policy from a licensed insurance carrier in this state to insure against any accident, loss, injury, property damage, or other casualty caused by or resulting from the contractor’s actions; and be properly equipped to perform the services to be provided.
(5) All costs, including costs owed to a third party, incurred by the commission or other law enforcement agency in the relocation or removal of a vessel that unreasonably or unnecessarily constitutes a navigational hazard or interferes with another vessel are recoverable against the vessel owner. The Department of Legal Affairs shall represent the commission in actions to recover such costs.
History.s. 4, ch. 63-105; s. 1, ch. 65-361; s. 2, ch. 72-16; s. 1, ch. 2014-143; s. 7, ch. 2017-163.
Note.Former s. 371.503.

Arrestable Offenses under F.S. 327.44

M = misdemeanor · F = felony · degree: F=1st S=2nd T=3rd
§327.44HEALTH-SAFETYREMOVEDI

Cases Citing F.S. 327.44

Copy

·Stivers v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 777 So. 2d 1023 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16890, 2000 WL 1872986

...(2000) ("flood hazards"); § 255.553(3), Fla. Stat. (2000) ("hazard of ... asbestos-containing materials"); §§ 284.06, 590.082(1), Fla. Stat. (2000) ("fire hazard"); §§ 316.081(1)(b), 316.087(1)(a) & (b), 316.122, 316.123, 316.125(1), 316.185, Fla. Stat. (2000) ("traffic hazard"); § 327.44, Fla....
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityReese (2012)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

In Re the Complaint of Gore Marine Corp., 767 F. Supp. 2d 1316 (M.D. Fla. 2011).

Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2011 A.M.C. 1951, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13305, 2011 WL 588720

...the channel, in open waters, and with no navigational difficulties generally or under the conditions on that evening. The Court finds that the CAPTAIN JEROME was not in violation of 33 U.S.C. § 403 or § 409. (16) Failure to Comply with Fla. Stat. § 327.44: Ms. Skaggs asserts that the CAPTAIN JEROME violated Fla. Stat. § 327.44. The parties dispute whether Fla. Stat. § 327.44 applied to the CAPTAIN JEROME, and if so whether this statute was violated and whether any violation caused or contributed to the allision. (Doc. # 109, § XI(12).) Florida Statute § 327.44 provides that "[n]o person shall anchor, operate, or permit to be anchored, except in case of emergency, or operated a vessel or carry on any prohibited activity in a manner which shall unreasonably or unnecessarily constitute a navigational hazard or interfere with another vessel. Anchoring under bridges or in or adjacent to heavily traveled channels shall constitute interference if unreasonable under the prevailing circumstances." Fla. Stat. § 327.44....
...The CAPTAIN JEROME was not anchored under a bridge or in or adjacent to a channel. There was no credible evidence that the location of the anchorage was unreasonable under the prevailing circumstances. The Court finds that the CAPTAIN JEROME did not violate Fla. Stat. § 327.44....

This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham W. Syfert, a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney (Florida Bar No. 39104). For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.