CopyCited 17 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1999 WL 754708
...ed one-way signs at the intersection in the instant case, regardless of the FDOT's policy interpreting the MUTCD not to require the signs. At the trial below, both the FDOT and the Drews agreed that the State of Florida "owns" and operates U.S. 441. Section 335.09, Florida Statutes (1989), entitled "Uniform Erection and Maintenance of Traffic Control Devices," provides: The department shall erect and maintain a uniform system of signs, signals, markings, and other traffic control devices for the...
0 red0 yellow9 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityCampbell (2007)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityGoldman (2006)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 26 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 22056
for naturalization was transferred pursuant to § 335.9 of this chapter. 8 C.F.R. § 337.2(a) (emphasis
1 red0 yellow16 green0 procedural
CopyCited 3 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 12 Fla. L. Weekly 61
...created the danger, the dissent does not address the question of the power or legal authority of the entity to give such warning. Only D.O.T. has the authority to erect "signs, signals, markings and other traffic control devices" on a state highway. § 335.09, Fla....
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityPollock (2004)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 3 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1990 WL 48630
...ition at an intersection and failure to warn). Here, as was made clear in McFadden and Alderman, DOT had the sole authority to erect and maintain traffic signs, and the sheriff in no way created or contributed to the alleged dangerous condition. See § 335.09, Fla....
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityUdy (2001)phrase: "rule_authority"
