Syfert Injury Law Firm
Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
The 2024 Florida Statutes
|
||||||
|
Total Results: 20
Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1989-02-15T23:53:00-08:00
Citation: 538 So. 2d 846
Snippet: those decisions involved takings under section 338.04, Florida Statutes (1973), which mandated that property…the rationale of Stubbs to takings under section 338.04. The Capital Plaza case involved a reduction in
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1988-01-20T00:00:00-08:00
Citation: 518 So. 2d 970, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 249, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 120, 1988 WL 2252
Snippet: 285 So.2d 1 (Fla.1973). Stubbs held that section 338.04, Florida Statutes (1971) mandates jury consideration
Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 1986-12-02T23:53:00-08:00
Snippet: Production Credit Association v. Schirow, 388 So.2d 338 (4 D.C.A.Fla., 1980). Whenever possible, several laws
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1986-05-28T00:53:00-07:00
Citation: 489 So. 2d 1172
Snippet: The taking from Respondents involved a Section 338.04 limited access taking. A part of Respondents'…taken for limited access road purposes, Section 338.04 as construed in the Anhoco case requires consideration…Stubbs to say that severance damages under section 338.04, Florida Statutes (1971), are to be put before …Stubbs holding depends in great part on section 338.04, Florida Statutes, which sets the rules for compensation…sufficient basis for compensation under section 338.04; and that evidence of severance damages should
Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1986-05-01T00:53:00-07:00
Citation: 488 So. 2d 62
Snippet: as was done in Nelson v. State, 1941, 148 Fla. 338, 4 So.2d 375. On one hand the testimony sought might
Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1981-04-15T23:53:00-08:00
Citation: 397 So. 2d 682
Snippet: not a limited access facility governed by section 338.04. Instead, the instant case concerns alleged damages
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1979-10-11T00:53:00-07:00
Citation: 381 So. 2d 1090
Snippet: taken for limited access road purposes, Section 338.04 as construed in the Anhoco case requires consideration…quot;limited access facilities" under Section 338.04, Florida Statutes. In the Stubbs' opinion the…the court said: "In Florida, F.S., Section 338.04, F.S.A., provides for the taking of `private or…quot;limited access facility" under Section 338.04, Florida Statutes. The majority opinion cites Simkins
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1978-11-06T23:53:00-08:00
Citation: 363 So. 2d 1166
Snippet: So.2d 482 (Fla. 1974); Nelson v. State, 148 Fla. 338, 4 So.2d 375 (1941). See also Bryan v. Wainwright,
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1976-09-15T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 336 So. 2d 1278, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15461
Snippet: . We think the court erred and reverse. Section 338.04, F.S.1971, first enacted in 1955, provides that
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1975-05-23T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 312 So. 2d 781, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14921
Snippet: point as there is an alternate source, Fla. Stat. § 338.04 (1973), which empowers the acquisition of property…incident to a limited access highway. Fla. Stat. § 338.04 (1973). *7832.The proceeding must be dismissed
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1974-06-18T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 296 So. 2d 530, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 6971
Snippet: Supreme Court of Florida in Nelson v. State, 148 Fla. 338, 4 So.2d 375 (1941), and the holding of the Court
Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1973-06-27T00:53:00-07:00
Citation: 285 So. 2d 1
Snippet: American jurisprudence. In Florida, F.S., Section 338.04, F.S.A., provides for the taking of "private… The taking from Respondents involved a Section 338.04 limited access taking. A part of Respondents'…taken for limited access road purposes, Section 338.04 as construed in the Anhoco case requires consideration
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1971-01-29T00:00:00-08:00
Citation: 244 So. 2d 764, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 7065
Snippet: title. Plaintiff notes that F.S.1967, section 338.-04, F.S.A., provides for the acquisition of property… this section.” (Emphasis supplied.) Therefore, 338.04 (2) is not applicable since S.R. #528 is a toll
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1971-01-12T00:00:00-08:00
Citation: 244 So. 2d 530
Snippet: Supreme Court’s decision in Nelson v. State, 148 Fla. 338, 4 So.2d 375. Accordingly, the judgment appealed is
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1970-07-23T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 237 So. 2d 800, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6220
Snippet: 28, 90 L.Ed. 429, and Nelson v. State, 148 Fla. 338, 4 So.2d 375 (1941). JOHNSON, C. J., and CARROLL,
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1970-05-14T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 237 So. 2d 341, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6179
Snippet: be without merit. See Nelson v. State, 148 Fla. 338, 4 So.2d 375 (1941). Appellant having failed to demonstrate
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1970-03-05T23:53:00-08:00
Citation: 232 So. 2d 451
Snippet: as was done in Nelson v. State, 1941, 148 Fla. 338, 4 So.2d 375. On one hand the testimony sought might
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1963-10-17T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 156 So. 2d 862
Snippet: such the Road Department is required under Section 338.04, F.S., F.S.A., to condemn the consequential rights
Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1963-04-02T23:53:00-08:00
Citation: 152 So. 2d 731
Snippet: 524, 30 So. 816, and Nelson v. State, 148 Fla. 338, 4 So.2d 375. As we are obligated to do by Sec. 924.32
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1963-03-27T00:00:00-08:00
Citation: 155 So. 2d 703, 1963 Fla. App. LEXIS 3436
Snippet: objection thereto. See Nelson v. State, 148 Fla. 338, 4 So.2d, page 375. As to the sufficiency of evidence