The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XXVII
RAILROADS AND OTHER REGULATED UTILITIES

Chapter 361
PUBLIC UTILITIES: SPECIAL POWERS

View Entire Chapter

CHAPTER 361

PUBLIC UTILITIES: SPECIAL POWERS

PART I

EMINENT DOMAIN RIGHTS

(ss. 361.01-361.08)

PART II

JOINT ELECTRIC POWER SUPPLY PROJECTS

(ss. 361.10-361.18)

PART I

EMINENT DOMAIN RIGHTS

361.01 Eminent domain.

361.02 Constructing dams for waterpower.

361.025 Right of eminent domain to railroad companies.

361.03 Right of eminent domain to electric railway companies.

361.04 Right of eminent domain to waterworks companies.

361.05 Right of eminent domain to natural gas companies.

361.06 Right of eminent domain to petroleum and petroleum products pipeline companies.

361.07 Right of eminent domain to companies owning and operating sewer or wastewater reuse systems.

361.08 Right of eminent domain to coal pipeline companies.

361.01 Eminent domain.—The president and directors of any corporation organized for the purpose of constructing, maintaining or operating public works, or their properly authorized agents, may enter upon any lands, public or private, necessary to the business contemplated in the charter, and may appropriate the same, or may take from any land most convenient to their work, any timber, stone, earth or other material which may be necessary for the construction and the keeping in repair of its works and improvements upon making due compensation according to law to private owners.

History.—s. 10, ch. 1639, 1868; RS 2158; GS 2683; RGS 4111; CGL 6042.

361.02 Constructing dams for waterpower.—Whenever any person owning lands in this state on any watercourse, may desire to erect dams for furnishing power for a water gristmill, electric light power, or other machine for public utility, and shall not have the fee simple title to the lands on the opposite side thereof, against which the petitioner would abut his or her dam, or surrounding lands which would be overflowed thereby, he or she may proceed to condemn such affected lands under the provisions of law relating to the condemnation of lands for other purposes.

History.—s. 1, ch. 5198, 1903; GS 2684; RGS 4112; CGL 6043; s. 544, ch. 95-148.

361.025 Right of eminent domain to railroad companies.—Any railroad company organized under the laws of this state, or organized under the laws of any other state and qualified to do business in this state, shall have the right of eminent domain to enter upon, for survey purposes, any land necessary for the construction, operation, and maintenance of its roads and required facilities and to appropriate the same or any part thereof upon making due compensation according to the procedures set forth in chapters 73 and 74; however, no such company shall have the right of eminent domain with respect to property belonging to the state or any agency thereof. Any railroad company may construct, operate, and maintain its roads and required facilities on such property, subject only to the permitting requirements and reasonable regulations that may be imposed by the public authorities having jurisdiction over such property. The right of eminent domain for the purpose of securing terminal facilities on any waters of this state, including a sufficient amount of land for such facilities, shall be subordinate to the right of the governmental entity wherein the property is located to condemn such property through the exercise of its powers of eminent domain for a public purpose.

History.—ss. 6, 16, ch. 82-90; s. 3, ch. 83-113; s. 1, ch. 83-212; ss. 9, 10, ch. 92-192; s. 147, ch. 99-13.

361.03 Right of eminent domain to electric railway companies.—Any electric railway company operating or constructing any line of its railway outside the incorporated limits of cities or towns in this state, whether for the purpose of transporting passengers exclusively or not, shall have the same rights, powers and privileges of eminent domain as are now exercised and enjoyed by all railroad and canal companies in this state, as and with reference to and concerning the condemnation of public and private property for the right-of-way of such railroads and canals, and such electric railway company shall have the right, privilege and authority to condemn and acquire such right-of-way for the construction of its lines in the same manner and by the use of the same process as is now prescribed by the laws of this state for the condemnation of right-of-way for railroads and canals, and each and every one of the laws of the state applying to the condemnation of right-of-way for railroads and canals in this state, shall apply to, govern and control the acquisition of such right-of-way by and for such electric railway companies.

History.—s. 1, ch. 5018, 1901; GS 2685; RGS 4113; CGL 6044.

361.04 Right of eminent domain to waterworks companies.—Any corporation organized under the laws of this state, either general or special, for the purpose of supplying any city, town, village, or the inhabitants thereof, or any community with water for domestic or sanitary purposes, or for fire protection, shall have the right, through its officers or agents, to enter upon any land, public or private, necessary to the business contemplated in its charter, and may appropriate the same; or may take from any land most convenient to its works, any timber, stone, earth, water or material which may be necessary for the construction, operation, keeping in repair or preservation of such works, upon making due compensation according to law to private owners; and should such waterworks company derive its supply of water, or any part thereof, from any lake, pond or stream of water, whether surface of subterranean, it may, upon making compensation as above specified, to private owners, appropriate any land lying contiguous to such pond, lake or stream, necessary for the preservation or protection of said water from diversion or contamination.

History.—s. 1, ch. 4165, 1893; GS 2686; RGS 4114; CGL 6045.

361.05 Right of eminent domain to natural gas companies.—Any corporation or other business entity organized under the laws of this state, or by virtue of the laws of any other state, and qualified to do business in this state, for the purpose of supplying any city, town, village or the inhabitants thereof, or any community with natural gas for domestic or industrial purposes, including any natural gas transmission pipeline company that has received certification under ss. 403.9401-403.9425 or an entity that is subject to regulation under the federal Natural Gas Act, 15 U.S.C. s. 717, shall have the right of eminent domain and may use the provisions of chapters 73 and 74 to lay its pipelines and works; to cause such examinations and surveys for the proposed pipelines to be made as shall be necessary for the selection of the most advantageous routes; to enter upon any land, public or private, necessary to the business contemplated in its charter; to construct its pipelines across, over, under, along, and upon any stream of water, watercourse, canal, lake, bay, gulf, road, street, highway, railroad, and transmission line; to take from any land most convenient to its pipelines and works, any timber, stone, earth, water, or other material which may be necessary to the construction, operation, keeping in repair, or preservation of its pipelines, works, and improvements, upon making due compensation according to law to private owners, with such reservation, if any, of oil, gas, and mineral rights as those owners may determine. If, in order to make repairs to or to relocate any tracks of any railroad or for the performance of any work of construction or reconstruction by any railroad upon its right-of-way, it becomes necessary to relocate temporarily or permanently any natural gas pipeline constructed upon any railroad right-of-way, such work incident to the relocation of such natural gas pipeline shall be performed, and the expense borne, by the company owning or operating that pipeline.

History.—s. 1, ch. 26893, 1951; s. 13, ch. 92-284; s. 1, ch. 2004-77.

361.06 Right of eminent domain to petroleum and petroleum products pipeline companies.—Any pipeline company which is or which intends to be a common carrier of petroleum and petroleum products and which is duly incorporated for such purpose under the laws of this state, or which is a foreign corporation and is qualified to do business in this state as a common carrier of petroleum and petroleum products shall have all the rights of eminent domain and all other rights granted to natural gas companies under s. 361.05 for the purpose of acquisition of rights-of-way for the installation, operation, maintenance, repair and replacement of its pipelines and all structures, pumping stations and other installations and works incident thereto. It is specifically provided, however, that no such company shall have any right of eminent domain as to any property belonging to or operated by the state or any agency thereof, or by any county, school board, municipality or public body. However, any such pipeline company shall have the right to all necessary permits to install, operate, maintain, repair and replace its pipelines under, along and across such property, subject only to reasonable regulations that may be imposed by the particular authority having jurisdiction of such property.

History.—s. 1, ch. 57-1983; s. 1, ch. 69-300.

361.07 Right of eminent domain to companies owning and operating sewer or wastewater reuse systems.—Any corporation, person, or persons owning or operating a sewer or wastewater reuse system in this state duly authorized and regulated by the Florida Public Service Commission, or county in the state for the collection, treatment, purification, or disposal of sewage effluent and residue, including wastewater reuse, for the public shall have the right of eminent domain to enter upon any land, public or private, necessary to the business of operating such aforesaid sewer and wastewater reuse system for the public and may appropriate the same or any part thereof necessary for the operation of such sewer or wastewater reuse system, upon making due compensation according to law to private owners; provided that any lands so appropriated shall revert to the person or his or her successor in title from whom the land was acquired, should said sewer or wastewater reuse system be abandoned or cease to operate as a sewer or wastewater reuse system.

History.—s. 2, ch. 65-248; s. 10, ch. 93-51; s. 545, ch. 95-148.

¹361.08 Right of eminent domain to coal pipeline companies.—

(1) It is the intent of the Legislature that the purpose of adopting this section to provide eminent domain powers and related benefits to certain firms is to make available low-cost electric power to all residents of the state and that this section should be construed consistently with this public interest policy.

(2) Any corporation, partnership, joint venture, association, or other legal entity organized under the laws of this state, or under the laws of any other state and qualified to do business in this state, for the purpose of supplying any electric utility or utilities; any city, town, or village or the inhabitants thereof; or any community with coal or its derivatives and any mixture and combination thereof by pipeline, and for the purpose of serving as a common carrier operating or proposing to operate a pipeline or pipelines for transporting or delivering coal or its derivatives or any mixture or combination thereof, shall have the right of eminent domain, for the purpose of acquiring title, easements, rights-of-way, or other rights or interests in property, necessary to acquire and take private property which is or may be needed for the construction, operation, maintenance, repair, or replacement of coal slurry and derivative plants, pipelines, pumping stations, and any other installations and works incident thereto. The procedure to condemn property or interest therein shall be exercised in the manner set forth in chapters 73 and 74. In any condemnation proceeding under this act, the circuit court shall restrict the exercise of the right of eminent domain in the following particulars:

(a) The right of eminent domain shall be limited to the taking of property or an interest therein from the owner which results in the least property or interest therein being taken to effect the purpose of the condemning entity.

(b) All takings shall be subject to the legal obligation (which shall become a restrictive covenant on the property or interest therein taken) on the part of the condemning authority and its successor in title or interest, jointly and severally, to convey the title or property interest taken to the condemnee or the condemnee’s heirs, successors, or assigns if the condemned property or interest therein is not used within a reasonable time after the taking, which time limit shall be fixed by the court in the condemnation proceeding.

(c) If the property or interest therein is conveyed to the condemnee or to the condemnee’s heirs, successors, or assigns, the grantee of such conveyance shall pay or cause to be paid to the condemning authority or to its successor in title or interest, as the case may be, consideration, in cash, which shall be equal to the value of the condemned property or interest therein being conveyed, as determined as of the time of the taking, discounted at a rate of 10 percent per year, compounded annually, from the date of the taking to the date of the conveyance.

History.—ss. 1, 2, ch. 79-236; s. 546, ch. 95-148; s. 9, ch. 2006-214.

¹Note.—Section 5, ch. 79-236, provides that “[t]his act shall take effect when every state in which the coal slurry pipeline will pass en route to Florida has enacted laws granting eminent domain authority to coal slurry pipeline companies or other entities operating or proposing to operate a coal slurry pipeline, and when the appropriate governmental authority has guaranteed in writing to the Public Service Commission that a continuous source of water shall be available for use in said coal slurry pipeline.”

PART II

JOINT ELECTRIC POWER
SUPPLY PROJECTS

361.10 Purpose.

361.11 Definitions.

361.12 Joint electric power supply project.

361.13 Powers.

361.14 Limitation on joint ownership of project or output thereof.

361.15 Issuance of bonds.

361.16 Powers supplemental.

361.17 Project taxing power; interests subject to taxation.

361.18 Construction.

361.10 Purpose.—The purpose of this act is to implement the provisions of s. 10(d), Art. VII of the State Constitution, as amended. This act may be known and cited as the “Joint Power Act.”

History.—s. 1, ch. 75-200.

361.11 Definitions.—When used in this part:

(1) “Project” means a joint electric power supply project and any and all facilities, including all equipment, structures, machinery, and tangible and intangible property, real and personal, for the joint generation or transmission of electrical energy, or both, including any fuel supply or source useful for such a project.

(2) “Electric utility” means any municipality, authority, commission, or other public body, investor-owned electric utility, or rural electric cooperative which owns, maintains, or operates an electrical energy generation, transmission, or distribution system within the state on June 25, 1975.

(3) “Person” means:

(a) Any natural person;

(b) The United States; any state; any municipality, political subdivision, or municipal corporation created by or pursuant to the laws of the United States or any state; or any board, corporation, or other entity or body declared by or pursuant to the laws of the United States or any state to be a department, agency, or instrumentality of any thereof;

(c) Any corporation, not-for-profit corporation, firm, partnership, cooperative association, electric cooperative, or business trust of any nature whatsoever organized and existing under the laws of the United States or any state; or

(d) Any foreign country; any political subdivision or governmental unit of a foreign country; or any corporation, not-for-profit corporation, firm, partnership, cooperative association, electric cooperative, or business trust of any nature whatsoever organized and existing under the laws of a foreign country or of a political subdivision or governmental unit of a foreign country.

(4) “Foreign public utility” means any person, as defined in subsection (3), the principal location or principal place of business of which is not located within this state, which owns, maintains, or operates facilities for the generation, transmission, or distribution of electrical energy and which supplies electricity to retail or wholesale customers, or both, on a continuous, reliable, and dependable basis; or any affiliate or subsidiary of such person, the business of which is limited to the generation or transmission, or both, of electrical energy and activities reasonably incidental thereto.

History.—s. 2, ch. 75-200; s. 3, ch. 82-53.

361.12 Joint electric power supply project.—In addition to its existing powers, any electric utility, or any organization, association, or separate legal entity whose membership consists only of electric utilities, by participating in an agreement to implement a project, is authorized and empowered to join with any one or more of the following:

(1) Any other electric utility;

(2) Any organization, association, or separate legal entity whose membership consists only of electric utilities;

(3) One or more foreign public utilities; or

(4) Any other person, if the right to full possession and to all of the use, services, output, and capacity of any such project during the original estimated useful life thereof is vested, subject to creditors’ rights, in any one or more electric utilities, in any one or more of any such legal entity, in any one or more foreign public utilities, or in any combination thereof;

for the purpose or purposes of jointly financing, acquiring, constructing, managing, operating, or owning any project or projects. In the implementation of this act, any group of electric utilities may create any organization, association, or separate legal entity whose membership consists only of electric utilities for the accomplishment of the purposes of this act. However, no such organization, association, or separate legal entity may own, operate, or exercise the power of eminent domain with respect to any facilities for the retail distribution of electrical energy.

History.—s. 3, ch. 75-200; s. 4, ch. 82-53.

361.13 Powers.—Any electric utility, or any organization, association, or separate legal entity whose membership shall consist only of electric utilities, participating in an agreement to implement a project has the following additional powers as they may relate to the project:

(1) To plan, finance, acquire, construct, purchase, operate, maintain, use, share the cost of, own, lease, sell, or dispose of any project or projects within or without the state.

(2) To exercise the power of eminent domain, except to acquire the generating, transmission, or distribution facilities of any other electric utility or foreign public utility.

(3) To purchase capacity or energy, or both, in any quantity agreed upon in the joint power agreement from any project in which the purchaser has an ownership interest.

History.—s. 4, ch. 75-200; s. 5, ch. 82-53.

361.14 Limitation on joint ownership of project or output thereof.—The additional powers and authority provided in this chapter shall in no way be considered to authorize or permit the joint ownership of any project by, or the direct or indirect sale or transfer of the services, products, capacity, or energy of any project to, any person or persons other than electric utilities; any organization, association, or separate legal entity whose membership consists only of electric utilities; foreign public utilities; or any combination thereof, except that joint ownership of any such project with any other person shall be permitted if the right to full possession and to all of the use, services, output, and capacity of such project during the original estimated useful life thereof is vested, subject to creditors’ rights, in any one or more electric utilities, in any one or more of any such legal entity, in any one or more foreign public utilities, or in any combination thereof.

History.—s. 5, ch. 75-200; s. 6, ch. 82-53.

361.15 Issuance of bonds.—For the purpose of financing or refinancing the cost of a project or projects, any municipality, authority, board, commission, or other public body which is an electric utility as defined in this act and is a participant in a project under this act may exercise all the powers in connection with the authorization, issuance, and sale of bonds as the same are conferred upon municipalities by part I of chapter 159. All of the privileges, benefits, powers, and terms of part I of chapter 159 shall be fully applicable to such body. For the purpose of this section, a project as defined in this part shall be a project within the definition of the term “project” in s. 159.02(4).

History.—s. 6, ch. 75-200.

361.16 Powers supplemental.—The powers conferred by this act shall be in addition, and supplementary, to existing powers and statutes, and this act shall not be construed as altering, repealing, or limiting any of the provisions of any other law, general, local, or special, or of any articles of incorporation of an electric utility. However, when the exercise of any power conferred on a municipality, authority, commission, or other public body by this act would conflict with a limitation upon the public body contained in its charter or otherwise expressed by special act, such charter or special act limitation shall be superseded by this act for the purposes of the exercise of such power pursuant to this act.

History.—s. 7, ch. 75-200.

361.17 Project taxing power; interests subject to taxation.—Except as provided in s. 10, Art. VII of the State Constitution, no joint electric supply projects authorized under this statute shall lend or use its taxing power or credit to aid any corporation, association, partnership, or person. The private interest portion of such joint projects shall be subject to all taxation in accordance with their proportionate interest in such projects.

History.—s. 8, ch. 75-200.

361.18 Construction.—

(1) The provisions of this part, being necessary for the welfare and prosperity of the state and its inhabitants, shall be liberally construed to effect its purposes.

(2) Chapter 82-53, Laws of Florida, shall be deemed to be enacted for the purpose of further implementing the provisions of s. 10(d), Art. VII of the State Constitution, as amended.

History.—s. 9, ch. 75-200; s. 8, ch. 82-53.

F.S. 361 on Google Scholar

F.S. 361 on Casetext

Amendments to 361

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 361

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S100.361 10 - ELECTION LAWS - VIOLATE MUNICIPAL RECALL LAW - M: S

S379.361 2a - CONSERVATION-LICENSE-STAMP - VIOL SALTWATER PRODUCTS LIC REGS - M: S

S379.361 2a - CONSERVATION-LICENSE-STAMP - VIOL SALTWATER PRODUCTS LIC REGS SUBSQ OFF - M: F

S379.361 2b - CONSERVATION-LICENSE-STAMP - FAIL TO HAVE RESTRICTED SPECIES ENDORSEMENT - M: S

S379.361 2b - CONSERVATION-LICENSE-STAMP - FAIL HAVE RESTRICT SPECIES ENDORSE SUBSQ OFF - M: F

S379.361 2c - CONSERVATION-LICENSE-STAMP - FAIL TO HAVE LICENSE AND ENDORSEMENT ON VESSEL - M: S

S379.361 2c - CONSERVATION-LICENSE-STAMP - FAIL HAVE LIC AND ENDORSE ON VESSEL SUBSQ OFF - M: F

S379.361 2d - CONSERVATION-LICENSE-STAMP - FAIL TO HAVE DECAL ON COMMERCIAL VESSEL - M: S

S379.361 2d - CONSERVATION-LICENSE-STAMP - FAIL TO HAVE DECAL ON COMM VESSEL SUBSQ OFF - M: F

S379.361 2f - CONSERVATION-LICENSE-STAMP - WHOLESALE DEALER BUY FROM UNLICENSED PERSON - M: S

S379.361 2f - CONSERVATION-LICENSE-STAMP - WHOLESALE DEAL BUY FROM UNLIC PERSON SUBSQ OFF - M: F

S379.361 2h - CONSERVATION-FISH - FAIL TO HAVE CATCH PRESERVATION METHOD - M: S

S379.361 2h - CONSERVATION-FISH - FAIL HAVE CATCH PRESERVATION METHOD SUBSQ OFF - M: F

S379.361 2i - CONSERVATION-LICENSE-STAMP - FAIL TO HAVE COMMERCIAL VESSEL REGISTRATION - M: S

S379.361 2i - CONSERVATION-LICENSE-STAMP - FAIL HAVE COMM VESSEL REGISTRATION SUBSQ OFF - M: F

S379.361 2j - CONSERVATION-LICENSE-STAMP - FAIL TO HAVE MARINE LIFE FISHING ENDORSEMENT - M: S

S379.361 2j - CONSERVATION-LICENSE-STAMP - FAIL HAVE MARINE LIFE FISH ENDORSE SUBSQ OFF - M: F

S379.361 3 - CONSERVATION-LICENSE-STAMP - FAIL TO HAVE FINFISH NET LICENSE - M: S

S379.361 3 - CONSERVATION-LICENSE-STAMP - FAIL TO HAVE FINFISH NET LICENSE SUBSQ OFF - M: F

S379.361 4 - CONSERVATION-LICENSE-STAMP - FAIL TO HAVE SPECIAL ACTIVITY LICENSE - M: S

S379.361 4 - CONSERVATION-LICENSE-STAMP - FAIL TO HAVE SPECIAL ACTIVITY LIC SUBSQ OFF - M: F

S379.361 5 - CONSERVATION-LICENSE-STAMP - RENUMBERED. SEE REC # 9141 - M: S

S379.361 5b - CONSERVATION-LICENSE-STAMP - HARVEST OYSTERS APALACHICOLA BAY WO VALID LIC - M: S

S379.361 5d - CONSERVATION-LICENSE-STAMP - USE ANOTHER'S APALACH BAY OYSTER RESIDENT LIC - M: S

S379.361 5d - CONSERVATION-LICENSE-STAMP - OBT RESIDENT LIC APALACH BAY OYSTER NON-FL RES - M: S

S379.361 5e - CONSERVATION-LICENSE-STAMP - FAIL TO ATTEND SEMINAR APALACH BAY OYSTER LIC - M: S

S379.361 5f - CONSERVATION-LICENSE-STAMP - FAIL HAVE PROVIDE PROOF APALACH BAY OYSTER LIC - M: S

S379.361 5g - CONSERVATION-LICENSE-STAMP - FAIL DISPLAY LIC # APALACH BAY OYSTER HARVEST - M: S

S550.361 1 - BOOKMAKING - REPLD 1992 HORSE DOG TRACK JAI ALAI 1ST OFF - F: T

S550.361 2 - BOOKMAKING - REPEALED 1992 HORSE DOG TRACK JAI ALAI 2ND OFF - F: S

S817.361 - FRAUD - RENUMBERED. SEE REC # 7776 - M: S

S817.361 - FRAUD - RENUMBERED. SEE REC # 7777 - M: F

S817.361 2 - FRAUD - UNLAWFUL SALE OF MULTIUSE TICKT OR OTHR MEDIUM - M: F

S817.361 3b - FRAUD - UNLAW SALE MULTIUSE TCKT OTHR MED 2ND OR SUBSQ - F: T

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR SAINTS PETER AND PAUL HOME, v. PENNSYLVANIA, J. v., 140 S. Ct. 2367 (U.S. 2020)

. . . . ----, ----, 140 S.Ct. 355, 361, 205 L.Ed.2d 291 (2019) ; Husted v. A. . . . S., at ----, 140 S.Ct., at 360-361 (quoting A. Scalia & B. . . . United States , 488 U.S. 361, 372, 109 S.Ct. 647, 102 L.Ed.2d 714 (1989). . . . S. ----, ----, 140 S.Ct. 355, 361, 205 L.Ed.2d 291 (2019)), militates against the Court's conclusion, . . .

P. BARR, v. AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF POLITICAL CONSULTANTS, INC., 140 S. Ct. 2335 (U.S. 2020)

. . . United States , 398 U.S. 333, 361-367, 90 S.Ct. 1792, 26 L.Ed.2d 308 (1970) (Harlan, J., concurring in . . .

AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, v. ALLIANCE FOR OPEN SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL, INC., 140 S. Ct. 2082 (U.S. 2020)

. . . different organizational structures to deliver services in different places. 106 F.Supp.3d 355, 360-361 . . . See 106 F.Supp.3d at 360-361. . . . positions on the same matter through [their] different organizational components." 106 F.Supp.3d at 361 . . . Id. , at 361. The Court of Appeals understood the District Court's order that way, too. . . .

SEILA LAW LLC, v. CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, 140 S. Ct. 2183 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Rev., at 361. . . . United States , 488 U.S. 361, 385, 109 S.Ct. 647, 102 L.Ed.2d 714 (1989) ("[M]ere anomaly or innovation . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, v. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, J. v., 140 S. Ct. 1891 (U.S. 2020)

. . . . ----, ----, 139 S.Ct. 361, 370, 202 L.Ed.2d 269 (2018), confining it to those rare "administrative . . . United States , 488 U.S. 361, 372, 109 S.Ct. 647, 102 L.Ed.2d 714 (1989), Congress put in place intricate . . . Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism (USA PATRIOT ACT) Act of 2001, § 423(b), 115 Stat. 361 . . .

UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, v. COWPASTURE RIVER PRESERVATION ASSOCIATION LLC, v., 140 S. Ct. 1837 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Gaumer , 146 Colo. 409, 412, 361 P.2d 778, 780 (1961), "a possessor and an easement holder can simultaneously . . .

L. BAXTER v. BRACEY,, 140 S. Ct. 1862 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Rev. 323, 341-361 (1992), and Achtenberg, A "Milder Measure of Villainy": The Unknown History of 42 U . . .

BANISTER, v. DAVIS,, 140 S. Ct. 1698 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Bennett , 531 U.S. 4, 121 S.Ct. 361, 148 L.Ed.2d 213 (2000), that an application is commonly regarded . . . Id ., at 8, 121 S.Ct. 361. . . .

GEORGIA, v. PUBLIC. RESOURCE. ORG, INC., 140 S. Ct. 1498 (U.S. 2020)

. . . United States , 389 U.S. 347, 360-361, 88 S.Ct. 507, 19 L.Ed.2d 576 (1967) (Harlan, J., concurring) ( . . .

BABB, v. WILKIE,, 140 S. Ct. 1168 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Birmingham Bd. of Ed. , 544 U.S. 167, 174, 125 S.Ct. 1497, 161 L.Ed.2d 361 (2005). . . .

K. KAHLER, v. KANSAS, 140 S. Ct. 1021 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Egelhoff , 518 U.S. 37, 43, 116 S.Ct. 2013, 135 L.Ed.2d 361 (1996) (plurality opinion). . . . Egelhoff , 518 U.S. 37, 43, 116 S.Ct. 2013, 135 L.Ed.2d 361 (1996) (plurality opinion). . . .

GUERRERO- LASPRILLA, v. P. BARR, v. P., 140 S. Ct. 1062 (U.S. 2020)

. . . . ----, ----, 139 S.Ct. 361, 369-370, 202 L.Ed.2d 269 (2018). . . .

C. HERNANDEZ, v. MESA, Jr., 140 S. Ct. 735 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Dimension Financial Corp. , 474 U.S. 361, 373-374, 106 S.Ct. 681, 88 L.Ed.2d 691 (1986). . . .

SMITH v. UNITED STATES., 140 S. Ct. 907 (U.S. 2020)

. . . No. 19-361 Supreme Court of the United States. . . .

PETER, v. NANTKWEST, INC., 140 S. Ct. 365 (U.S. 2019)

. . . . § 361 (authorizing "reasonable expenses, including attorneys' fees"); § 1447(c) ("An order remanding . . .

C. ROTKISKE, v. KLEMM,, 140 S. Ct. 355 (U.S. 2019)

. . . See ante, at 361 - 362. . . . See ante , at 361 - 362. . . .

RUDLEY, M. D. B. v. LITTLE ROCK POLICE DEPARTMENT In In, 935 F.3d 651 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Eichenberger, 677 F.3d 361, 366 (8th Cir. 2012), in which the plaintiff complied with the arresting officer's . . .

ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, 935 F.3d 858 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Rose , 425 U.S. 352, 361, 96 S.Ct. 1592, 48 L.Ed.2d 11 (1976) (quoting Rose v. . . . certain documents in virtual reading rooms. 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(2) ; Dep't of Air Force , 425 U.S. at 361 . . .

UNITED STATES v. MCADORY,, 935 F.3d 838 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Rios-Beltran , 361 F.3d 1204 (9th Cir. 2004), which addressed whether a conviction under Oregon's sentencing . . .

PEREZ- SANCHEZ, v. U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,, 935 F.3d 1148 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Cortez, 930 F.3d at 361. . . .

UNITED STATES v. A. ADAMS,, 934 F.3d 720 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . McDuffy , 636 F.3d 361, 363-64 (7th Cir. 2011) ; Illinois v. . . . App'x 359, 361 (6th Cir. 2014) ; United States v. . . .

WOLFINGTON, v. RECONSTRUCTIVE ORTHOPAEDIC ASSOCIATES II PC, a k a, 935 F.3d 187 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Dismissal under these circumstances was error.") 824 F.3d 353, 361 (3d Cir. 2016). Glick v. . . . Id. ; accord Bruni , 824 F.3d at 361-62. 12 C.F.R. § 226.2(a)(14). 616 F.2d 328, 333 (7th Cir. 1980). . . .

BOXILL, v. P. O GRADY E. E. T., 935 F.3d 510 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . City of Memphis , 361 F.3d 898, 905 (6th Cir. 2004) (quoting Hooks v. . . .

JIE FANG Li v. DIRECTOR UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, 935 F.3d 172 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . See Hosseini , 826 F.3d at 361 (finding Pinho "particularly instructive"). Id. at 362. Id. . . . Id. at 361 (quoting Pinho , 432 F.3d at 201 ). 8 U.S.C. § 1101 et seq. 8 C.F.R. § 214.1(d). . . .

UNITED STATES v. G. WAGUESPACK,, 935 F.3d 322 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Romero-Medrano , 899 F.3d at 361 (quotation omitted). . . .

KELSAY, v. ERNST,, 933 F.3d 975 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Eichenberger , 677 F.3d 361, 366-67 (8th Cir. 2012) ; Montoya v. . . .

CLARK, v. WARDEN,, 934 F.3d 483 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . See, e.g. , Gumm , 775 F.3d at 361 (exculpatory information included the officers' tip sheets and investigation . . .

ODDO, v. BIMBO BAKERIES U. S. A. INC., 391 F. Supp. 3d 466 (E.D. Pa. 2019)

. . . J. 11-12); 500 F.3d 361, 374 (3d Cir. 2007) ; see also Mayan, 2009 WL 3152136, at *9 n.12. . . .

IN RE MIAMI METALS I, INC., 603 B.R. 727 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Capitol Piece Dye Works, Inc. , 6 N.Y.2d 465, 468, 190 N.Y.S.2d 361, 160 N.E.2d 842 (1959) (fabric sent . . .

UNITED STATES v. NG LAP SENG, Ng, Ng W. C., 934 F.3d 110 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Cartwright, 486 U.S. 356, 361, 108 S.Ct. 1853, 100 L.Ed.2d 372 (1988) ; United States v. . . .

PILLAR DYNASTY LLC, v. NEW YORK COMPANY, INC., 933 F.3d 202 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Wilkerson , 361 F.3d 717, 732 (2d Cir. 2004). . . .

L. ROMANSKY, v. SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI, 933 F.3d 293 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . United States , 361 U.S. 212, 80 S.Ct. 270, 4 L.Ed.2d 252 (1960), that an indictment cannot be amended . . .

PARENT PROFESSIONAL ADVOCACY LEAGUE M. W. a F. D. S. S. a S. Y. v. CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, MASSACHUSETTS J., 934 F.3d 13 (1st Cir. 2019)

. . . Union Carbide Corp., 361 F.3d 696, 714 (2d Cir. 2004) (stating that an "organization lacks standing to . . .

T. SCHMITT v. LAROSE,, 933 F.3d 628 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Husted , 144 Ohio St.3d 361, 43 N.E.3d 419, 423 (2015) (per curiam). . . . Husted , 144 Ohio St.3d 361, 43 N.E.3d 419, 423 (2015) (per curiam) ("Election officials serve as gatekeepers . . .

KORTRIGHT CAPITAL PARTNERS LP, TY v. INVESTCORP INVESTMENT ADVISERS LIMITED,, 392 F. Supp. 3d 382 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Supp. 3d at 359, 361. . . .

IN RE GOOGLE INC. COOKIE PLACEMENT CONSUMER PRIVACY LITIGATION H., 934 F.3d 316 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Dukes , 564 U.S. at 361-63, 131 S.Ct. 2541. . . .

JONES, v. A. BERRYHILL,, 392 F. Supp. 3d 831 (M.D. Tenn. 2019)

. . . Celebrezze , 351 F.2d 361, 374 (6th Cir. 1965). B. . . .

LONGORIA, v. HUNTER EXPRESS, LIMITED, 932 F.3d 360 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Justice , 297 F.3d 361, 369 n.8 (5th Cir. 2002). . . .

UNITED STATES v. BOSYK,, 933 F.3d 319 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . Richardson , 607 F.3d 357, 361, 371 (4th Cir. 2010) (same, based on two emailed images); United States . . .

FLORES, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,, 391 F. Supp. 3d 353 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Supp. 2d 355, 361 (S.D.N.Y. 2008). . . . Supp. 2d at 361. The second declarant, Darian Hodge, is the FOIA point of contact in SDNY. . . .

DALTON, v. NPC INTERNATIONAL, INC., 932 F.3d 693 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Benjamin , 361 F.3d 460, 464-65 (8th Cir. 2004) (reversing portion of judgment dismissing with prejudice . . .

ATLAS BREW WORKS, LLC, v. P. BARR,, 391 F. Supp. 3d 6 (D.D.C. 2019)

. . . Concentrated Phosphate Export Ass'n, 393 U.S. 199, 203, 89 S.Ct. 361, 21 L.Ed.2d 344 (1968) (alterations . . .

UNITED STATES v. FELDMAN,, 931 F.3d 1245 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . United States , 361 U.S. 212, 217, 80 S.Ct. 270, 4 L.Ed.2d 252 (1960). . . .

DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE, v. RUSSIAN FEDERATION, 392 F. Supp. 3d 410 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Holy See, 556 F.3d 361, 382 (6th Cir. 2009) ("We join the Second and D.C. . . . Supp. 3d 344, 361 (D.D.C. 2015). . . .

CRYSTALLEX INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION v. BOLIVARIAN REPUBLIC OF VENEZUELA De S. A. D. C. In De S. A., 932 F.3d 126 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Deena Artware, Inc. , 361 U.S. 398, 402-404, 80 S.Ct. 441, 4 L.Ed.2d 400 (1960) ). . . . Republic of Congo , 383 F.3d 361, 369 (5th Cir. 2004). . . . Deena Artware, Inc. , 361 U.S. 398, 402, 80 S.Ct. 441, 4 L.Ed.2d 400 (1960), where the Court held that . . .

UNITED STATES v. FIELDS,, 932 F.3d 316 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . One Assortment of 89 Firearms , 465 U.S. 354, 361, 104 S.Ct. 1099, 79 L.Ed.2d 361 (1984) ). Id. . . .

POSADA, v. ACP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., 389 F. Supp. 3d 149 (D. Mass. 2019)

. . . Supp. 2d 361, 363-64 (D. . . .

HUNT, WAL- MART STORES, INC., 931 F.3d 624 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . City of Chicago , 164 F.3d 353, 361 (7th Cir. 1998) (noting that "an adverse party may not rest upon . . .

UNITED STATES v. VARGAS- MOLINA,, 392 F. Supp. 3d 809 (E.D. Mich. 2019)

. . . (Id. at PageID.361.) . . .

IN RE RAYNOR, v. P., 602 B.R. 703 (B.A.P. 8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Sharecom, Inc. , 210 F.3d 928, 940 n. 13 (8th Cir.2000) (emphasis in original), aff'd after remand 361 . . .

FACIANE, v. SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA,, 931 F.3d 412 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Id. at 361 (quotation omitted). . . .

PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTHWEST OHIO REGION v. DEWINE, 931 F.3d 530 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Planned Parenthood Cincinnati Region , 122 Ohio St.3d 361, 911 N.E.2d 871, 877-79 (2009). . . .

PETERSON, v. HEYMES,, 931 F.3d 546 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Alabama , 361 U.S. 199, 206, 80 S.Ct. 274, 4 L.Ed.2d 242 (1960) ; see also Culombe v. . . .

U. S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION, v. MONEX CREDIT COMPANY, 931 F.3d 966 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . First City Nat'l Bank of Houston , 386 U.S. 361, 366, 87 S.Ct. 1088, 18 L.Ed.2d 151 (1967). . . .

CALIFORNIA v. ABBVIE INC., 390 F. Supp. 3d 1176 (N.D. Cal. 2019)

. . . App. 4th at 500-01, 148 Cal.Rptr.3d 361. . . . App. 4th at 502, 148 Cal.Rptr.3d 361. . . . App. 4th. at 500-01, 148 Cal.Rptr.3d 361. . . . Id. at 491-92, 148 Cal.Rptr.3d 361. . . . Id. at 500-01, 148 Cal.Rptr.3d 361. . . .

HAHN, v. MOSELEY,, 931 F.3d 295 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . United States , 361 U.S. 212, 215-16, 80 S.Ct. 270, 4 L.Ed.2d 252 (1960). . . .

N DIAYE, v. P. BARR,, 931 F.3d 656 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Ashcroft, 361 F.3d 1088, 1091 (8th Cir. 2004) ). . . .

KOALA, v. KHOSLA,, 931 F.3d 887 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Gohn , 850 F.2d 361, 365 (8th Cir. 1988) (finding state action where Student Senate was a "creation[ . . .

E. CHAMBERS, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA,, 389 F. Supp. 3d 77 (D.D.C. 2019)

. . . Supp. 3d 349, 361 (D.D.C. 2014) ("Ordinarily, ... a plaintiff alleging a violation of Title VII must . . .

UNITED STATES v. IWAI,, 930 F.3d 1141 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . (collecting cases where anticipatory warrants were obtained for controlled delivery); 67 A.L.R.5th 361 . . .

KELLER, v. FLEMING,, 930 F.3d 746 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Lawson, 461 U.S. 352, 361, 103 S.Ct. 1855, 75 L.Ed.2d 903 (1983) (invalidating a stop-and-identify statute . . .

TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC v. PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR ACRES, PERMANENT OVERLAY EASEMENT FOR ACRES AND TEMPORARY EASEMENTS FOR ACRES IN MILFORD AND WESTFALL TOWNSHIPS, PIKE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NUMBERS a c o L. P., 931 F.3d 237 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Sage, 361 F.3d 808, 821 (4th Cir. 2004) ; S. Nat. Gas Co. v. . . .

BIGSBY, Jr. v. BARCLAYS CAPITAL REAL ESTATE, INC., 391 F. Supp. 3d 336 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Co., 446 F.3d 356, 361 (2d Cir. 2006) ; see Lyman v. CSX Transp., Inc., 364 F. . . .

WONGUS, v. CORRECTIONAL EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM CERT CERT s, 389 F. Supp. 3d 294 (E.D. Pa. 2019)

. . . Bank of Am. , 361 F.3d 217, 222 n.3 (3d Cir. 2004) ). Walker v. Mathis , 665 F. . . .

GIBSON, Ca v. SCE GROUP, INC. d b a d b a s,, 391 F. Supp. 3d 228 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Azrak-Hamway Int'l, Inc. , 724 F.2d 357, 361 (2d Cir. 1983). . . . Supp. 2d 361, 365 (S.D.N.Y. 2000), aff'd, 29 F. App'x 676 (2d Cir. 2002) ). . . .

MANNING v. CALDWELL, s FOR CITY OF ROANOKE s, 930 F.3d 264 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . Mallas , 762 F.2d 361, 364 n.4 (4th Cir. 1985). . . . Egelhoff , 518 U.S. 37, 56, 116 S.Ct. 2013, 135 L.Ed.2d 361 (1996) (plurality); Medina v. . . . Egelhoff , 518 U.S. 37, 49, 116 S.Ct. 2013, 135 L.Ed.2d 361 (1996) (plurality) (citing Third Special . . .

HENRY, a v. HULETT,, 930 F.3d 836 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . United States , 389 U.S. 347, 361, 88 S.Ct. 507, 19 L.Ed.2d 576 (1967) (Harlan, J., concurring); see . . .

B. SULLIVAN, v. DUMONT,, 391 F. Supp. 3d 161 (D. Mass. 2019)

. . . Jarema , 94 Mass.App.Ct. 210, 113 N.E.3d 355, 361 (2018) (holding that written conversations between . . .

ACUITY, A v. REX, LLC LLC EVAC EMS,, 929 F.3d 995 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Benjamin, 361 F.3d 460, 464 (8th Cir. 2004) ("A district court is generally barred from dismissing a . . .

INDIVIOR INC. UK RB Rx, LLC, v. DR. REDDY S LABORATORIES, S. A. Dr. s UT, USA, UK RB v. LLC,, 930 F.3d 1325 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . Harwood , 112 U.S. 354, 361, 5 S.Ct. 174, 28 L.Ed. 665 (1884). . . .

DILLARD v. CITY OF SPRINGDALE, ARKANSAS O L. P. L. P. USA, LLC v. O L. P. L. P. USA, LLC, 930 F.3d 935 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . McCarty , 284 Ark. 5, 678 S.W.2d 361, 364 (1984) (citing Restatement (Second) of Torts § 652 et seq. . . .

STARR INDEMNITY LIABILITY COMPANY, v. BRIGHTSTAR CORP., 388 F. Supp. 3d 304 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . CONCLUSION...361 Plaintiff Starr Indemnity & Liability Company ("Starr") brings this action seeking a . . .

UNITED STATES v. L. DESOTELL,, 929 F.3d 821 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Arroyo-Blas , 783 F.3d 361, 366 (1st Cir. 2015) ("We expect and require counsel to address a waiver of . . .

BUTTS, A. F. a v. UNITED STATES s M. D. CNM R. N. R. N. CNM M. D. R. N., 930 F.3d 234 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . Mercy Hosp., Inc. , 720 F.2d 356, 361 (4th Cir. 1983). III. . . .

JETTE, v. UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,, 387 F. Supp. 3d 149 (D. Mass. 2019)

. . . See id. at 361-362, 126 S.Ct. 1869. . . .

CIVIL BEAT LAW CENTER FOR THE PUBLIC INTEREST, INC. v. CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL PREVENTION,, 929 F.3d 1079 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Rose , 425 U.S. 352, 361, 96 S.Ct. 1592, 48 L.Ed.2d 11 (1976) ). . . .

UNITED STATES v. PAYANO,, 930 F.3d 186 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . United States , 488 U.S. 361, 363, 109 S.Ct. 647, 102 L.Ed.2d 714 (1989). . . .

TORCUP, INC. v. AZTEC BOLTING SERVICES, INC., 386 F. Supp. 3d 520 (E.D. Pa. 2019)

. . . Roche Holdings Ltd. , 292 F.3d 361, 370 (3d Cir. 2002) (quoting Asahi Metal Indus. Co., Ltd. v. . . .

REID v. DONELAN,, 390 F. Supp. 3d 201 (D. Mass. 2019)

. . . Robison, 415 U.S. 361, 368, 94 S.Ct. 1160, 39 L.Ed.2d 389 (1974). . . .

W. WEINSTEIN, v. C. KRUMPTER, E. P. B. I- IV,, 386 F. Supp. 3d 220 (E.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Hartford , 361 F.3d 113, 122 (2d Cir. 2004) (stating that in deciding a Rule 56 motion, the court "is . . .

CRUTSINGER, v. DAVIS,, 929 F.3d 259 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Bennett , 531 U.S. 4, 121 S.Ct. 361, 148 L.Ed.2d 213 (2000), changed the interpretation of the Antiterrorism . . . Id. at 527, 125 S.Ct. 2641. 531 U.S. 4, 121 S.Ct. 361, 148 L.Ed.2d 213 (2000). . . .

SIERRA CLUB v. J. TRUMP, T. K., 929 F.3d 670 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Ct. 361, 370, 202 L.Ed.2d 269 (2018). Each element is satisfied here. . . . Robison , 415 U.S. 361, 373, 94 S.Ct. 1160, 39 L.Ed.2d 389 (1974) ); see also City of Chicago v. . . . Ct. 361, 370, 202 L.Ed.2d 269 (2018) (noting the "basic presumption of judicial review [created by the . . .

UNITED STATES v. BRENNAN,, 928 F.3d 210 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . United States , 463 U.S. 354, 361, 103 S.Ct. 3043, 77 L.Ed.2d 694 (1983) ("It is clear that commitment . . .

ABDULLAYEVA, v. ATTENDING HOMECARE SERVICES LLC,, 928 F.3d 218 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Corp. , 525 U.S. 70, 79-80, 119 S.Ct. 391, 142 L.Ed.2d 361 (1998) ). . . .

A. ZADEH v. ROBINSON,, 928 F.3d 457 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Id. at 361. . . .

UNITED STATES v. MYERS, 928 F.3d 763 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Mason , 361 Ark. 357, 206 S.W.3d 869, 873-74 (2005). . . .

R. BROWN, E. R. A. v. COLLIER, R. R. A. v., 929 F.3d 218 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Brown , 461 F.3d 353, 361 (3d Cir. 2006) ("[W]here the connection is obvious, common sense may suffice . . .

CALIFORNIA, v. HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,, 390 F. Supp. 3d 1061 (N.D. Cal. 2019)

. . . Nos. 361 ("Fed. Opp."), 359 ("March Opp."). Oregon replied. See Dkt. No. 365 ("Reply"). II. . . .

TD BANK N. A. v. W. HILL, II,, 928 F.3d 259 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Co. , 499 U.S. 340, 361, 111 S.Ct. 1282, 113 L.Ed.2d 358 (1991). . . . GE Consumer & Indus., Inc. , 622 F.3d 361, 366 (5th Cir. 2010). . . .

ANDY WARHOL FOUNDATION FOR THE VISUAL ARTS, INC. v. GOLDSMITH, 382 F. Supp. 3d 312 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Co., 499 U.S. 340, 361, 111 S.Ct. 1282, 113 L.Ed.2d 358 (1991) ). . . .

D. WATSON, v. PEARSON, s, 928 F.3d 507 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Stone , 748 F.2d 361 (6th Cir. 1984) ; State v. . . .

PROBODANU, v. B. SESSIONS, III,, 387 F. Supp. 3d 1031 (C.D. Cal. 2019)

. . . Holder , 361 F. App'x 725 (9th Cir. 2009). Like Mr. Santosa, Mr. . . . App'x at 643 ; Woy , 361 F. App'x at 725. . . .

IN RE PETTERS COMPANY, INC. LLC PC LLC LLC SPF LLC PL LLC MGC PAC LLC A. BMO v. BMO N. A. M I, 603 B.R. 424 (Bankr. Minn. 2019)

. . . Minn.), Dkt. 361. Def.'s Mem., Dkt. 339, Ex. I. Pl.'s Resp., Dkt. 342, Ex. 5. Id. . . .

IN RE DENNIS T., 927 F.3d 1015 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . In re Halbert , 576 B.R. at 595, citing In re Hickey , 473 B.R. 361, 364 (Bankr. D. Or. 2012). . . .

THOMAS v. ESCHEN, 928 F.3d 709 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . (referencing the favorable-termination requirement); Lockenour , 57 Ind. at 361, 364-65 (same); Fowle . . .

JEFFREY FARKAS, M. D. LLC d b a v. CIGNA HEALTH AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,, 386 F. Supp. 3d 238 (E.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Blue Cross Blue Shield of Fla. , 361 F. . . . See LI Neuroscience Specialists , 361 F. Supp. 3d at 357. . . .

HALL- WADLEY, v. MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT,, 386 F. Supp. 3d 512 (E.D. Pa. 2019)

. . . Bank of Am., 361 F.3d 217, 222 n.3 (3d Cir. 2004) ). Groman v. . . .

UNITED STATES v. ERICKSON,, 388 F. Supp. 3d 1086 (D. Minn. 2019)

. . . Supp. 3d 361, 364 (D.R.I. 2014) (stating "that some of the [Paroline ] factors ... are at best difficult . . .

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, v. NEW YORK,, 139 S. Ct. 2551 (U.S. 2019)

. . . . ----, ----, 139 S.Ct. 361, 370, 202 L.Ed.2d 269 (2018), this "is 'just' a presumption," and like all . . . . ----, ----, 139 S.Ct. 361, 370, 202 L.Ed.2d 269 (2018) (quoting Lincoln v. . . .

IN RE DEEPWATER HORIZON LFBP L. L. C. GW L. L. C. L. L. C. J. v. BP BP BP, P. L. C., 928 F.3d 394 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Salamon , 97 U.S. 361, 362, 24 L.Ed. 1044 (1878). It did. . . .