Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
The 2024 Florida Statutes
|
||||||
|
Total Results: 19
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-09-28
Snippet: preference or advantage” to any customer, section 366.03, Florida Statutes (2021). We have repeatedly
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-05-19
Citation: 191 So. 3d 897
Snippet: any public utility for its service.”); see also § 366.03, Fla. Stat. (2014) (“All rates and charges made
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2007-09-20
Citation: 966 So. 2d 298, 2007 WL 1074938
Snippet: proceeding before a new trial judge and jury. Id. at 366.[3] This Court also denied Riechmann's petition for
Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 2005-03-03
Snippet: the impact of PEF's obligation to serve section 366.03, Florida Statutes. The statute requires a public
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1989-01-20
Citation: 538 So. 2d 55, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 240, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 249, 1989 WL 3890
Snippet: contract with the mall owner, but rather from Section 366.03, Florida Statutes, which imposed a duty on public
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1988-09-13
Citation: 531 So. 2d 373, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2140, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4030, 1988 WL 93289
Snippet: The public policy embodied in this [e.g., Section 366.03, Florida Statutes (1977)] and similar statutory
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1988-03-02
Citation: 523 So. 2d 628, 1988 WL 15438
Snippet: statutory duty is claimed to be found in section 366.03, Florida Statutes (1981), which requires each public
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1987-01-22
Citation: 501 So. 2d 585, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 75
Snippet: serve a customer in FMM's position under section 366.03, Florida Statutes (1983). Both FPL and intervenor
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1987-01-05
Citation: 501 So. 2d 580, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 27, 1987 Fla. LEXIS 1389
Snippet: reasonable and must not be unduly discriminatory. Id. § 366.03. *584City Gas argues that there was no evidence
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1983-02-17
Citation: 427 So. 2d 716, 1983 WL 813604
Snippet: 243 So.2d 195 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971). See also § 366.03, Fla. Stat. (1981). Pan Am argued that FPL discriminatorily
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1980-06-17
Citation: 385 So. 2d 124, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17034
Snippet: of the state, however, as expressed in Section 366.03, Florida Statutes (1977) is that "[N]o public utility
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1979-01-23
Citation: 366 So. 2d 798, 1979 WL 396265
Snippet: excessive fuel adjustment charges[1] in violation of § 366.03, Fla. Stat. (1977). The complaint sought refunds
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1976-06-04
Citation: 336 So. 2d 548
Snippet: rates must be "fair and reasonable," Fla. Stat. § 366.03, and, when rate adjustments are necessary because
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1973-03-13
Citation: 274 So. 2d 558
Snippet: statute rather than a contract. Florida Statutes, § 366.03, F.S.A., provides, inter alia: "Each public utility
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1968-11-06
Citation: 217 So. 2d 304
Snippet: necessarily broad and comprehensive. Fla. Stat. § 366.03 (1967), F.S.A.; Florida Power & Light Co. v. City
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1966-06-01
Citation: 187 So. 2d 335
Snippet: we relied heavily upon the fact that in Sections 366.03, 366.04, 366.05, 366.06(2) and 366.07, the legislature
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1965-07-14
Citation: 182 So. 2d 429
Snippet: having the effect forbidden by Ch. 542. Section 366.03 requires each public utility (i.e., in general
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1959-09-30
Citation: 115 So. 2d 9
Snippet: terms as required by the commission, * * F.S.A. § 366.03. The Withl'a-coochee River Electric Cooperative
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1958-07-31
Citation: 104 So. 2d 653
Snippet: v. Tip Top Grocery Co., 151 Fla. 247, 9 So.2d 366. [3] See: Bowles v. Elkes Pontiac Co., Fla. 1952,