Florida Statute 375.021 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXVIII
NATURAL RESOURCES; CONSERVATION, RECLAMATION, AND USE

Chapter 375
OUTDOOR RECREATION AND CONSERVATION LANDS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 375.021

375.021 Comprehensive multipurpose outdoor recreation plan.—

(1) The department is given the responsibility, authority, and power to develop and execute a comprehensive multipurpose outdoor recreation plan for this state with the cooperation of the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, the Department of Transportation, the Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, the Department of Commerce, and the water management districts.

(2) The purpose of the plan is to document recreational supply and demand, describe current recreational opportunities, estimate the need for additional recreational opportunities, and propose means for meeting identified needs. The plan shall describe statewide recreational needs, opportunities, and potential opportunities.

(3) The outdoor recreation plan shall be kept current through continual reevaluation and revision. Each agency named in subsection (1) must submit data to the Department of Environmental Protection periodically, upon request, relative to recreational opportunities supplied by that agency, potential recreational opportunities which could be provided by the agency, and any other relevant recreational statistics that the agency may possess. The agencies shall meet periodically at the request of the Department of Environmental Protection to discuss recreational issues.

(4) The Department of Environmental Protection may contract with the Government of the United States, or any agency or instrumentality thereof; or with the state or any county, municipality, district authority, or political subdivision; or with any private corporation, partnership, association, or person providing for or relating to the development of outdoor recreation or conservation in accomplishing the purposes of this act. The department may receive and accept from any federal agency, state agency, or other public body grants or loans for or in aid of the purposes of this act; and the department may receive and accept aid, contributions, or loans from any other source of money, property, labor, or other things of value to be held, used, and applied only for the purpose for which such aid, grants, or loans were made. Without limiting or modifying any of the powers and authority of the department, but specifically as an addition thereto, the department is expressly authorized to participate in the land and water conservation fund program, established by and pursuant to Pub. L. No. 88-578, as it may be amended from time to time.

History.—s. 2, ch. 63-36; ss. 1, 2, ch. 67-351; s. 5, ch. 67-461; ss. 25, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 136, ch. 71-377; s. 107, ch. 73-333; s. 2, ch. 80-356; s. 32, ch. 81-167; s. 1, ch. 82-46; s. 5, ch. 82-152; s. 32, ch. 83-55; s. 5, ch. 83-114; s. 2, ch. 83-265; s. 64, ch. 86-163; ss. 9, 16, ch. 89-116; s. 282, ch. 94-356; s. 193, ch. 99-245; s. 10, ch. 2001-62; s. 251, ch. 2011-142; s. 116, ch. 2024-6.

F.S. 375.021 on Google Scholar

F.S. 375.021 on Casetext

Amendments to 375.021

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 375.021

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 375.021.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 375.021

Total Results: 6

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1985-04-01

Snippet: outdoor recreation and conservation plan. Section 375.021, F.S. The Department of Natural Resources (hereafter

Tilghman v. Mayo

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1955-07-22

Citation: 82 So. 2d 136

Snippet: Ed. 1745. See also State v. Heard, 49 La. Ann. 375, 21 So. 632; People ex rel. Rosebrough v. Casey, 251

McLeod v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1937-05-19

Citation: 174 So. 466, 128 Fla. 35, 1937 Fla. LEXIS 1215

Snippet: 5 S.W. Rep. 360; State v. Heard, 49 La. Ann. 375, 21 South. Rep. 632." The third question challenges

Beacham and Cowan v. Carr and Danner

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1936-01-06

Citation: 166 So. 456, 122 Fla. 736

Snippet: See Tiffany v. Boatmen's Sav. Inst., 18 Wall. 375, 21 Law Ed. 868. It appears *Page 745 also that Cowan

Sears v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1925-06-05

Citation: 104 So. 863, 89 Fla. 490

Snippet: 5 S.W. Rep. 360; State v. Heard, 49 La. Ann. 375, 21 South. Rep. 632. The only other assignment insisted

Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. City of Gainesville

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1922-02-22

Citation: 83 Fla. 275, 29 A.L.R. 668, 91 So. 118, 1922 Fla. LEXIS 551

Snippet: of Allegheny v. Western Pa. R. Co., 138 Pa. St. 375, 21 Atl. Rep. 763; Louisville & N. R. Co. v. City of