Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
The 2024 Florida Statutes
|
||||||
|
Total Results: 17
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-09-14
Citation: 222 So. 3d 17, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 13802
Snippet: Landowners are entitled to compensation”); see also § 380.08, Fla. Stat. (“Nothing in this chapter authorizes
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2012-07-27
Citation: 114 So. 3d 998, 2012 WL 3044250, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 12217
Snippet: they were entitled to have. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.380.8 As we have already said about the willful non-disclosure
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2003-12-10
Citation: 866 So. 2d 707, 2003 WL 22900537
Snippet: Landowners are entitled to compensation. Section 380.08, Florida Statutes (1997), provides that the government
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1995-04-07
Citation: 652 So. 2d 1247, 1995 WL 150347
Snippet: complication for the next eighteen years. Although section 380.08, Florida Statutes (1973), would have allowed Taylor
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1993-10-01
Citation: 629 So. 2d 161, 1993 WL 382986
Snippet: constitutions of this state or of the United States. § 380.08(1), Fla. Stat. (1991). In Snyder v. Board of County
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1991-09-16
Citation: 586 So. 2d 80, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 9077, 1991 WL 183014
Snippet: Properties, 399 So.2d 1374 (Fla.1981). Section 380.08(3), Florida Statutes (1987),1 provides that after
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1988-03-30
Citation: 522 So. 2d 1012
Snippet: 120.53(1) and the laws implemented are 380.07(3), 380.08(3), and 120.57(1)(b). [3] Rules 27G-1.06(2) and
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1988-01-29
Citation: 519 So. 2d 1069, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 289, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 402, 1988 WL 6398
Snippet: a governmental program." Additionally, Section 380.08(1), Florida Statutes, explicitly provides that
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1987-05-08
Citation: 507 So. 2d 150, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1208
Snippet: judgment. The purchasers claimed the expenditure of 2,380.8 hours. The hourly rate ranged from $30 per hour
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1983-09-13
Citation: 438 So. 2d 432, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 21639
Snippet: FLWAC with instructions to comply with Section 380.-08(3), Florida Statutes. Graham v. Estuary Properties
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1983-03-22
Citation: 442 So. 2d 221
Snippet: conditions and restrictions to its decision. Section 380.08(3), Florida Statutes requires that a governmental
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1981-12-11
Citation: 407 So. 2d 210
Snippet: by the agency of the matters required by section 380.08(3), Florida Statutes (1972). The action of the
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1981-04-16
Citation: 399 So. 2d 1374, 16 ERC 1766, 11 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20992, 16 ERC (BNA) 1766, 1981 Fla. LEXIS 2652
Snippet: Estuary to receive the permit, as required by section 380.08(3), Florida Statutes (1973). The recommended order
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1979-12-17
Citation: 381 So. 2d 1126
Snippet: thereby reaching an unduly restrictive result. F.S. 380.08, provides in part that: "(1) Nothing in this chapter
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1977-08-10
Citation: 351 So. 2d 1062, 8 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20
Snippet: without the payment of full compensation." Section 380.08(1). Thus invoking well-established standards which
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1975-11-26
Citation: 322 So. 2d 655
Snippet: Statute 380.07(2). [11] Florida Statutes 380.06(8), 380.08, and 380.07(2). By specifically designating parties
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1971-07-12
Citation: 252 So. 2d 361, 1971 Fla. LEXIS 3397
Snippet: of another.” . Pinder v. State, 27 Fla. 370, 380, 8 So. 837, 841 (1891); Foreman v. State, 47 So.2d