Florida Statute 383.04 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXIX
PUBLIC HEALTH

Chapter 383
MATERNAL AND INFANT HEALTH CARE

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 383.04

383.04 Prophylactic required for eyes of infants.—Every physician, midwife, or other person in attendance at the birth of a child in the state is required to instill or have instilled into the eyes of the baby within 1 hour after birth an effective prophylactic recommended by the Committee on Infectious Diseases of the American Academy of Pediatrics for the prevention of neonatal ophthalmia. This section does not apply to cases where the parents file with the physician, midwife, or other person in attendance at the birth of a child written objections on account of religious beliefs contrary to the use of drugs. In such case the physician, midwife, or other person in attendance shall maintain a record that such measures were or were not employed and attach thereto any written objection.

History.—s. 1, ch. 20690, 1941; ss. 19, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 123, ch. 77-147; s. 27, ch. 87-387; s. 57, ch. 97-101; s. 25, ch. 98-191.

F.S. 383.04 on Google Scholar

F.S. 383.04 on Casetext

Amendments to 383.04

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 383.04

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S383.04 - HEALTH-SAFETY - FAIL USE EFFECTIVE PROPHYLACTIC IN NEWBORN EYE - M: S

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 383.04

Total Results: 8

Chrysler v. DEPT. OF PRO. REGULATION

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1993-11-12T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 627 So. 2d 31

Snippet: improper questioning of the licensee. 560 So.2d 383. [4] In Celaya v. Department of Professional Regulation

Gambolati v. Sarkisian

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1993-07-14T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 622 So. 2d 47

Snippet: stipulation, the court entered judgment for $10,383.04 ($8,788.05 plus prejudgment interest in the amount

J.J. v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1993-07-06T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 620 So. 2d 1139, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 7027, 1993 WL 243133

Snippet: section 775.08, pursuant to a 1974 amendment, Ch. 74-383, § 4, Laws of Florida, may no longer be relied upon…extensively revised in a 1974 amendment. Ch. 74-383, § 4, Laws of Fla. No. 92-1948 District

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 1988-03-06T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: public streets). 3 See, AGO's 73-323 and 72-383. 4 See, AGO's 86-59 and 83-84. 5 See, WHEREAS

Johnson v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1970-06-10T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 236 So. 2d 473, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6335

Snippet: Brown v. State, Fla. 1968, 206 So.2d 377, text 383. 4. Lastly, Johnson contends that “he did not have

Shepherd v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1959-01-20T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 108 So. 2d 494

Snippet: . [3] Johnson v. State, 113 Fla. 193, 151 So. 383. [4] Coker v. State, 82 Fla. 5, 89 So. 222. [5] Coker

Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. City of Lakeland

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1927-08-01T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 115 So. 669, 94 Fla. 347

Snippet: concur. BROWN, J., concurs specially. *Page 383 4 January 1928 Supreme Court of Florida fla

State ex rel. Burr v. Jacksonville Terminal Co.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1916-03-02T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 71 Fla. 295

Snippet: Broom Co. v. Butler, 70 Fla. 397, 70 South. Rep. 383. Four of the railroad corporations named in the writ