Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 386.206 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 386.206 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 386.206

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXIX
PUBLIC HEALTH
Chapter 386
SANITARY NUISANCES; FLORIDA CLEAN AIR ACT
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 386.206
386.206 Posting of signs; requiring policies.
(1) The proprietor or other person in charge of an enclosed indoor workplace must develop and implement a policy regarding the smoking and vaping prohibitions established in this part. The policy may include, but is not limited to, procedures to be taken when the proprietor or other person in charge witnesses or is made aware of a violation of s. 386.204 in the enclosed indoor workplace and must include a policy which prohibits an employee from smoking or vaping, or both, in the enclosed indoor workplace. In order to increase public awareness, the person in charge of an enclosed indoor workplace may, at his or her discretion, post signs to indicate that smoking or vaping, or both, are prohibited.
(2) The person in charge of an airport terminal that includes a designated customs smoking room must conspicuously post, or cause to be posted, signs stating that smoking and vaping are prohibited except in the designated customs smoking room located in the customs area of the airport. Each sign posted pursuant to this subsection must have letters of reasonable size which can be easily read. The color, design, and precise locations at which such signs are posted shall be left to the discretion of the person in charge of the premises.
(3) The proprietor or other person in charge of an enclosed indoor workplace where a smoking or vaping cessation program, medical research, or scientific research is conducted or performed must conspicuously post, or cause to be posted, signs stating that smoking or vaping, or both, as applicable, are authorized for such purposes in designated areas in the enclosed indoor workplace. Each sign posted pursuant to this subsection must have letters of reasonable size which can be easily read. The color, design, and precise locations at which such signs are posted shall be left to the discretion of the person in charge of the premises.
History.s. 6, ch. 85-257; s. 6, ch. 92-185; s. 687, ch. 95-148; s. 7, ch. 2003-398; s. 10, ch. 2006-2; s. 7, ch. 2019-14.

F.S. 386.206 on Google Scholar

F.S. 386.206 on Casetext

Amendments to 386.206


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 386.206
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 386.206.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 386.206

Total Results: 5

Garrison Corp. v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1995-11-27

Citation: 662 So. 2d 1374, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12284, 1995 WL 694646

Snippet: Act to request an exemption from §§ 386.205 and 386.206 by application to the agency. The agency may grant

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1992-12-04

Snippet: charged with the enforcement of ss. 386.205 and 386.206, F.S.11 Section 386.207(2), F.S., directs public

Alen v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1992-03-03

Citation: 596 So. 2d 1083, 1992 WL 38333

Snippet: the court's control. State v. Thompson, 68 Ariz. 386, 206 P.2d 1037 (1949); Lewis v. United States, 146

Taylor v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1986-04-09

Citation: 491 So. 2d 1150, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 849

Snippet: the court's control. State v. Thompson, 68 Ariz. 386, 206 P.2d 1037 (1949); Lewis v. United States, 146

State v. Neil

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1984-09-27

Citation: 457 So. 2d 481, 53 U.S.L.W. 2200

Snippet: the court's control. State v. Thompson, 68 Ariz. 386, 206 P.2d 1037 (1949); Lewis v. United States, 146