Cases from cite.case.law:

GERING, v. STATE, 252 So. 3d 334 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . Similarly, section 394.9155(1) provides: The Florida Rules of Civil Procedure apply unless otherwise . . . See § 394.9155(1), Fla. . . .

D. WILLIAMS, v. STATE, 244 So. 3d 318 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . . § 394.9155(5), Fla. Stat (2016). . . .

McCLAM, v. STATE, 185 So. 3d 571 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . .” § 394.9155(5), Fla. Stat. (2014). . . . Stat. (2014). - Section 394.9155(5) allows hearsay under specific circumstances: Hearsay evidence, including . . . Cases considering the application of section 394.9155(5) have confronted hearsay evidence that was admitted . . .

HARTZOG, v. STATE, 133 So. 3d 570 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . .” § 394.9155(1), Fla. Stat. (2012). See Brown v. . . .

DAVIDSON, v. STATE, 105 So. 3d 672 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . See § 394.9155(1), Fla. . . .

DELGADO, v. STATE, 125 So. 3d 180 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . Section 394.9155(5), Florida Statutes (2006), provides, in pertinent part, that during a Jimmy Ryce Act . . . hjearsay evidence ... is admissible ... unless the court finds that such evidence is not reliable.” § 394.9155 . . .

STATE v. McELDOWNEY,, 99 So. 3d 610 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . Cartwright, 870 So.2d 152, 162 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004), rev. denied, 914 So.2d 952 (Fla.2005) (upholding section 394.9155 . . .

S. ANDERSON, v. STATE, 93 So. 3d 1201 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . See § 394.9155(1), Fla. Stat.; Fla. R. Civ. P.— S.V.P., 4.440(a)(1). . . .

L. BOATMAN, v. STATE, 77 So. 3d 1242 (Fla. 2011)

. . . . § 394.9155(1), Fla. Stat. (2008). . . .

MILNER, v. STATE, 50 So. 3d 711 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . Section 394.9155 states in relevant part, that: Rules adopted under s. 394.930 shall not constitute: . . . cause of action that the state needs to allege or prove in judicial proceedings under this part. § 394.9155 . . .

CLARK, v. STATE, 41 So. 3d 1052 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . disagree that the admission of these reports requires a new trial based on our standard of review; section 394.9155 . . . Section 394.9155 allows the introduction of hearsay evidence under the Jimmy Ryce Act, providing the . . . Section 394.9155 provides, in relevant part: (4) The court may consider evidence of prior behavior by . . . Section 394.9155(5) specifies that hearsay evidence is admissible unless the trial court finds it is . . . Section 394.9155(5) provides that reports prepared by a member of the multidisciplinary team or on behalf . . .

J. SHAW, v. STATE, 29 So. 3d 1161 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . probable cause, this case proceeded to a jury trial for civil commitment under the directives of section 394.9155 . . . State, 831 So.2d 93 (Fla.2002), and governed by the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, see section 394.9155 . . .

STEPHENS, v. STATE, 43 So. 3d 709 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . See § 394.9155(1), Fla. Stat. . . .

COTTON, v. STATE, 22 So. 3d 638 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . . §§ 394.912 and 394.9155, Fla. Stat. Appellant raises four issues with several sub-issues. . . . Pursuant to section 394.9155, Florida Statutes (2008), in “all civil commitment proceedings for sexually . . . See also § 394.9155(4), Fla. Stat. . . .

In FLORIDA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR INVOLUNTARY COMMITMENT OF SEXUALLY VIOLENT PREDATORS, 13 So. 3d 1025 (Fla. 2009)

. . . In respect to proposed rule 4.360, section 394.9155(7), Florida Statutes (2008), addresses the consequences . . . Section 394.9155 provides in pertinent part as follows: (7) If the person who is subject to proceedings . . . experts from testifying concerning mental health tests, evaluations, or examinations of the person. § 394.9155 . . .

SAINTELIEN, v. STATE, 990 So. 2d 494 (Fla. 2008)

. . . See also § 394.9155(1), Fla. . . .

WASHINGTON, v. STATE, 973 So. 2d 611 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . . § 394.9155(5), Fla. Stat. (2005). . . .

GREENE, v. STATE, 970 So. 2d 900 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . See § 394.9155(5), Fla. Stat. (2006). We answered this question contrary to Mr. . . .

PESCI, v. STATE, 963 So. 2d 780 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . Reliability Issue Pesci recognizes that section 394.9155(5), Florida Statutes (2006), allows the introduction . . . Section 394.9155, Florida Statutes (2006), specifies, in part, that: (4) The court may consider evidence . . . . 2d DCA 2003)(finding that the trial court did not err in admitting hearsay evidence under section 394.9155 . . . Similarly, we are not bound by the language in Jenkins, which suggests that “section 394.9155(5) must . . . 1114 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004)(rejecting defendant’s argument that the admission of hearsay under section 394.9155 . . . See Section 394.9155(5), Fla. Stat. . . .

J. MASTERS, v. STATE, 958 So. 2d 973 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . He also argues that section 394.9155(5), Florida Statutes (2006), which authorizes the admission of hearsay . . . Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 124 S.Ct. 1354, 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004); and (3) section 394.9155 violated the . . . 394.9155(5), Florida Statutes (2006) is unconstitutional because it purports to regulate, in a Jimmy . . . Section 394.9155(5), Florida Statutes, states: (5) Hearsay evidence, including reports of a member of . . . The constitutionality of section 394.9155 was not raised in Jenkins. . . .

TROVILLE, v. STATE, 953 So. 2d 637 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . . § 394.9155. . . . Appellant next argues that section 394.9155, entitled “Rules of procedure and evidence,” which was not . . . in the original Ryce Act, and which, in section 394.9155(5), allows hearsay evidence, should not have . . .

BROWN, v. STATE, 940 So. 2d 609 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . See § 394.9155(1), Fla. . . .

KEPHART, v. D. HADI, D. v., 932 So. 2d 1086 (Fla. 2006)

. . . Additionally, section 394.9155 permits hearsay evidence to be used in proceedings brought under the Act . . . Section 394.9155 provides in pertinent part: Hearsay evidence, including reports of a member of the multidisciplinary . . . however, hearsay evidence may not be used as the sole basis for committing a person under this part. § 394.9155 . . .

In COMMITMENT OF ALLEN. v., 927 So. 2d 1070 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . See § 394.9155(1). . . . Section 394.9155(5), Florida Statutes (1999), provides that "[h]earsay evidence, including reports of . . .

SLOSS, v. STATE, 925 So. 2d 419 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . Sloss contended that this violated section 394.9155(5), and that no jury question was presented. . . . With respect to hearsay, section 394.9155(5) provides: Hearsay evidence, including reports of a member . . . We conclude that the trial court properly admitted the evidence under section 394.9155(5), which “was . . .

MARSHALL, v. STATE, 915 So. 2d 264 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . . § 394.9155(1), Fla. Stat. (2004). . . . however, hearsay evidence may not be used as the sole basis for committing a person under this part. § 394.9155 . . . State, 803 So.2d 783, 785 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) (“Obviously [section 394.9155(5) ] must be construed in . . .

MITCHELL, v. STATE, 911 So. 2d 1211 (Fla. 2005)

. . . Moreover, section 394.9155(1), Florida Statutes (2000), provides that the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure . . . Moreover, section 394.9155(1), Florida Statutes (2000), provides that the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure . . . Moreover, section 394.9155(1), Florida Statutes (2000), states, “In all civil commitment proceedings . . .

KAKUK, v. STATE, 908 So. 2d 1088 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . The trial court partially granted the motion on March 25, 2008, citing to section 394.9155(7)(b) of the . . . argued against the motion, pointing out that the state was trying to end-run the limitations in section 394.9155 . . . proceedings, it appears that the Legislature has enacted a useless and meaningless statute — section 394.9155 . . . manner, conditions, and scope of the examination and the person or persons by whom it is to be made. . § 394.9155 . . .

OSBORNE, v. STATE, 907 So. 2d 505 (Fla. 2005)

. . . providing the statutory right to appeal from final judgments or orders in civil actions); see also § 394.9155 . . .

In COMMITMENT OF BRANCH. v., 890 So. 2d 322 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . Branch’s counsel argued that while the hearsay might be admissible under section 394.9155, Branch had . . . Id. at 785; see also § 394.9155(5). . . . hearsay that thwarts a Ryce Act respondent’s due process rights; indeed, this court has held that section 394.9155 . . .

WESTERHEIDE, v. STATE, 888 So. 2d 702 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . See § 394.9155(1), Fla. Stat. (2002); Westerheide v. State, 831 So.2d 93 (Fla.2002). . . .

In COMMITMENT OF BURTON. v., 884 So. 2d 1112 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . Section 394.9155(5), Florida Statutes (1999), allows for the use of hearsay in civil commitment proceedings . . .

WILLIAMS, v. STATE, 882 So. 2d 1082 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . . § 394.9155(1), Fla. . . .

In COMMITMENT OF RODGERS. v., 875 So. 2d 737 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . He also contends that the hearsay exception under the Act, section 394.9155(5), Florida Statutes (1999 . . .

F. CURRY, v. STATE, 880 So. 2d 751 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . See § 394.9155(1), Fla. Stat. (2002). . . . .

WILLIAMS, v. STATE, 870 So. 2d 922 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . Section 394.9155(1) provides for the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure and the Florida Rules of Evidence . . .

In COMMITMENT R. CARTWRIGHT. R. v., 870 So. 2d 152 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . The provision of the Ryce Act permitting the admission of hearsay evidence is found in section 394.9155 . . . Second, we will turn to Cartwright’s argument that section 394.9155(5) impermissibly invades the authority . . . State, 803 So.2d 783, 785 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) (“Obviously [section 394.9155(5)] must be construed in . . . Glendening thus sheds no light on whether the hearsay provision in section 394.9155(5) violates article . . . Thus, even if we were to conclude that section 394.9155(5) is “procedural,” rule 1.010 would require . . .

D. LEE, v. STATE, 854 So. 2d 709 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . next argues that the trial court erred in admitting unreliable hearsay evidence pursuant to section 394.9155 . . . Lee also challenges the constitutionality of section 394.9155(5) on due process, equal protection, and . . . Although no Florida case directly addresses the constitutionality of section 394.9155(5), in People v . . . While Lee argues generally against the constitutionality of section 394.9155(5), he points to no authority . . . The evidence was admissible under section 394.9155(5), and it was of the type appropriately used by experts . . .

STATE v. MITCHELL,, 848 So. 2d 1209 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . Moreover, section 394.9155(1), Florida Statutes (2000), provides that the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure . . .

JACKSON, v. STATE, 833 So. 2d 243 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . See § 394.9155(3), Fla. Stat. (2001). . . .

In COMMITMENT OF SUTTON. v., 828 So. 2d 1081 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . Compare § 394.9155(1), Fla. . . .

WESTERHEIDE, v. STATE, 831 So. 2d 93 (Fla. 2002)

. . . See §§ 394.9155(7), 394.918(l)-(2) Fla. Stat. (2001). . . . Section 394.9155, Florida Statutes (2001), specifies the rules of procedure and evidence applicable in . . . communications relevant to an issue in proceedings to involuntarily commit a person under this part.” § 394.9155 . . . See § 394.9155(7), Fla. Stat. (2001). . . .

HUDSON, v. STATE, 825 So. 2d 460 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . . § 394.9155. . . .

JENKINS, v. STATE, 803 So. 2d 783 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . See Section 394.9155(5), Fla. Stat. . . . Section 394.9155(5), Fla. . . .

STATE v. OSBORNE,, 781 So. 2d 1137 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . Even though section 394.9155(1) of the Act indicates that the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure are applicable . . .

WESTERHEIDE, v. STATE, 767 So. 2d 637 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . See § 394.9155(1), Fla. . . . 1999); (3) application of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure and the Florida Evidence Code, see § 394.9155 . . .

SJUTS, v. STATE, 754 So. 2d 781 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . See § 394.9155, Fla. Stat. (1999). . . .

MEADOWS, v. KRISCHER, W. A., 763 So. 2d 1087 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . .” § 394.9155(1). . . .