Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 399.001 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 399.001 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 399.001

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXIX
PUBLIC HEALTH
Chapter 399
ELEVATOR SAFETY
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 399.001
399.001 Short title and purpose.This chapter may be cited as the “Elevator Safety Act.” The purpose of this chapter is to provide for the safety of life and limb and to promote public safety awareness. The use of unsafe and defective lifting devices imposes a substantial probability of serious and preventable injury and exposes employees and the public to unsafe conditions. The prevention of these injuries and the protection of employees and the public from unsafe conditions is in the best interest of the public. Elevator personnel performing work covered by the Florida Building Code must possess documented training or experience or both and be familiar with the operation and safety functions of the components and equipment. Training and experience includes, but is not limited to, recognizing the safety hazards and performing the procedures to which they are assigned in conformance with the requirements of the Florida Building Code. This chapter establishes the minimum standards for elevator personnel.
History.s. 5, ch. 2001-186.

F.S. 399.001 on Google Scholar

F.S. 399.001 on Casetext

Amendments to 399.001


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 399.001
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 399.001.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 399.001

Total Results: 6

State v. Cassells

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2003-01-31T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 835 So. 2d 397

Snippet: occupants in the car, who were all young children. *399 One of the deputies approached Mr. Cassells and informed

GOLDEN SHORELINE LTD. PTNRSHP. v. McGowan

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2001-04-18T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 787 So. 2d 109

Snippet: SALCINES and STRINGER, JJ., concur. NOTES [1] Section 399.01(4), Florida Statutes (1993) defines Division to

Tucker v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1999-01-20T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 726 So. 2d 768

Snippet: burglary) concurrent with the other counts. Id. at 399.[1] Tucker appealed to the Fifth District asserting

Johnson v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1972-11-02T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 268 So. 2d 170

Snippet: .2d 53 (Ma.1971). . State v. Pitts, 241 So.2d 399 (1 Ma. App.1970). . State v. Pitts, 249 So.2d 47

Pitts v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1971-04-20T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 247 So. 2d 53

Snippet: reported in State v. Pitts and Lee, 241 So.2d 399, is one which involves a question of great public interest

Home Insurance Company v. Wiggins

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1962-11-28T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 147 So. 2d 157

Snippet: Orlando Farming Corp. (Fla.App. 1958), 102 So.2d 399. [1] Throckmorton v. Holt, 180 U.S. 552, 568, 21 S.Ct