Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 408.10 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 408.10 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 408.10

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXIX
PUBLIC HEALTH
Chapter 408
HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 408.10
408.10 Consumer complaints.The agency shall publish and make available to the public a toll-free telephone number for the purpose of handling consumer complaints and shall serve as a liaison between consumer entities and other private entities and governmental entities for the disposition of problems identified by consumers of health care.
History.s. 76, ch. 92-33; s. 22, ch. 2012-160.

F.S. 408.10 on Google Scholar

F.S. 408.10 on Casetext

Amendments to 408.10


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 408.10
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 408.10.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 408.10

Total Results: 20

State of Florida v. Joshua Lyle Creller

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2024-05-23T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: protected interest in the driver’s privacy. Id. at 408-10. 7 7. As explained in Caballes: … not violate the Fourth Amendment. 534 U.S. at 408-10. - 12 -

DEMETRIUS ELLIOT v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2018-04-18T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: replace the French doors and a hurricane window, and $408.10 to replace the locks after noticing that their

Nichole Vangansbeke v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2017-06-23T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 223 So. 3d 384, 2017 WL 2730086, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 9122

Snippet: interests. Illinois v. Caballes, 543 U.S. 405, 408‒10 (2005). A dog-sniff that prolongs a traffic stop

Federal Contracting, Inc. v. Bimini Shipping, LLC

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2013-12-18T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 128 So. 3d 904, 2014 A.M.C. 255, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 19975, 2013 WL 6644852

Snippet: Hyundai Merck Marine (Am.), Inc., 288 F.3d 405, 408-10 (9th Cir.2002); Mikinberg v. Baltic S.S. Co., 988

Gallogly v. Rodriguez

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2007-12-12T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 970 So. 2d 470

Snippet: claim, but the Fifth District reversed. Id. at 408-10. The court held that the manager's actions

Allen v. Butterworth

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2000-04-14T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 756 So. 2d 52

Snippet: courts with criminal jurisdiction. 714 So.2d 404, 408-10 (Fla.1998) (footnotes omitted). In addition to

State v. Crider

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1993-10-22T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 625 So. 2d 957

Snippet: 1110, 113 So. 561 (1927); Smith v. State, 29 Fla. 408, 10 So. 894 (1892); Pennick v. State, 453 So.2d 542

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 1990-08-07T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: D.C.A. Fla., 1983). 8 Id. at 408. 9 Id. at 407-408. 10 See, e.g., AGO 81-17. And see, Forbes Pioneer Boat

State v. In the Interest of D.I.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1985-08-21T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 474 So. 2d 408, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2010, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15511

Snippet: Glickstein, Hurley, Walden 21 August 1985 474 So. 2d 408, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2010, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15511

Pennick v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1984-08-07T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 453 So. 2d 542

Snippet: be proved by the State. Smith v. State, 29 Fla. 408, 10 So. 894 (1892); Cook v. State, 20 Fla. 802 (1884

Buchanan v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1959-04-20T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 111 So. 2d 51

Snippet: 24 Fla. 226, 4 So. 801; Smith v. State, 29 Fla. 408, 10 So. 894; Miami Transit Co. v. Amos, 115 Fla. 842

Kennedy v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1939-09-26T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 191 So. 193, 140 Fla. 124, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1066

Snippet: 35 Fla. 184, 17 So. 559; Smith v. State, 29 Fla. 408,10 So. 894; Andrews v. State, 21 Fla. 598; Bryan v

Campbell v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1937-02-26T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 173 So. 677, 127 Fla. 399, 1937 Fla. LEXIS 1458

Snippet: constituted a mere part. Smith v. State, 29 Fla. 408, 10 Sou. Rep. 894; Presley v. State, 63 Fla. 37, 57

Hurst v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1935-03-23T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 160 So. 355, 118 Fla. 877

Snippet: apparent on the record. Smith v. State,29 Fla. 408, 10 So. 894; Caldwell v. State, 43 Fla. 546,30 So.

Collingsworth v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1927-06-11T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 113 So. 561, 93 Fla. 1110

Snippet: reasonable doubt. Smith v. The State, 29 Fla. 408, 10 So. 894. The Court will take judicial knowledge

Minger v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1926-01-19T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 107 So. 416, 91 Fla. 79

Snippet: decisions of this court. Smith v. The State, 29 Fla. 408, 10 So. 895; Miller v. The State,71 Fla. 338, 71 So

Akin v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1923-12-20T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 86 Fla. 564, 98 So. 609

Snippet: judgment was not error. Smith v. State, 29 Fla. 408, 10 South. Rep. 894; King v. State, 43 Fla. 211, 31

State ex rel. Bonsteel v. Allen

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1922-02-10T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 83 Fla. 214, 91 So. 104

Snippet: v. State, 16 Fla. 291; Smith v. State, 29 Fla. 408, 10 South. Rep. 894; Ex. Parte Powell, 70 Fla. 363,

Lowman v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1920-06-10T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 80 Fla. 18, 85 So. 166

Snippet: 184, 17 South. Rep. 559; Smith v. State, 29 Fla. 408, 10 South. Rep. 894; Andrews v. State 21, Fla. 598;

Barker v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1919-11-22T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 78 Fla. 477, 83 So. 287

Snippet: anounced by this court in Smith v. State, 29 Fla. 408, 10 South. Rep. 894, is that great particularity is