Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 409.2564 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 409.2564 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 409.2564 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 409.2564

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XXX
SOCIAL WELFARE
Chapter 409
SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC ASSISTANCE
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 409.2564
409.2564 Actions for support.
(1) In each case in which regular support payments are not being made as provided herein, the department shall institute, within 30 days after determination of the obligor’s reasonable ability to pay, action as is necessary to secure the obligor’s payment of current support, any arrearage that may have accrued under an existing order of support, and, if a parenting time plan was not incorporated into the existing order of support, include either a signed, agreed-upon parenting time plan or a signed Title IV-D Standard Parenting Time Plan, if appropriate. The department shall notify the program attorney in the judicial circuit in which the recipient resides setting forth the facts in the case, including the obligor’s address, if known, and the public assistance case number. Whenever applicable, the procedures established under chapter 88, Uniform Interstate Family Support Act, chapter 61, Dissolution of Marriage; Support; Time-sharing, chapter 39, Proceedings Relating to Children, chapter 984, Children and Families in Need of Services; Prevention and Intervention for School Truancy and Ungovernable and Runaway Children, and chapter 985, Delinquency; Interstate Compact on Juveniles, may govern actions instituted under this act, except that actions for support under chapter 39, chapter 984, or chapter 985 brought pursuant to this act shall not require any additional investigation or supervision by the department.
(2) The order for support entered pursuant to an action instituted by the department under subsection (1) shall require that the support payments be made periodically to the department through the depository. An order for support entered under subsection (1) must include either a signed, agreed-upon parenting time plan or a signed Title IV-D Standard Parenting Time Plan, if appropriate. Upon receipt of a payment made by the obligor pursuant to any order of the court, the depository shall transmit the payment to the department within 2 working days, except those payments made by personal check which shall be disbursed in accordance with s. 61.181. Upon request, the depository shall furnish to the department a certified statement of all payments made by the obligor. Such statement shall be provided by the depository at no cost to the department.
(3) When it is no longer authorized to receive payments for the obligee, the department shall notify the depository to redirect income deduction payments to the obligee.
(4) Whenever the Department of Revenue has undertaken an action for enforcement of support, the Department of Revenue may enter into an agreement with the obligor for the entry of a judgment determining paternity, if applicable, and for periodic child support payments based on the child support guidelines schedule in s. 61.30. Before entering into this agreement, the obligor shall be informed that a judgment will be entered based on the agreement. The clerk of the court shall file the agreement without the payment of any fees or charges, and the court, upon entry of the judgment, shall forward a copy of the judgment to the parties to the action.
(5) Whenever the department has undertaken an action to determine paternity, to establish an obligation of support, or to enforce or modify an obligation of support, the department shall be a party to the action only for those purposes allowed under Title IV-D of the Social Security Act. The program attorney shall be the attorney of record solely for the purposes of support enforcement as authorized under Title IV-D and may prosecute only those activities which are eligible for federal financial participation under Title IV-D. An attorney-client relationship exists only between the department and the legal services providers in all Title IV-D cases. The attorney shall advise the obligee in Title IV-D cases that the attorney represents the agency and not the obligee.
(6) The department and its officers, employees, and agents and all persons and agencies acting pursuant to contract with the department are immune from liability in tort for actions taken to establish, enforce, or modify support obligations if such actions are taken in good faith, with apparent legal authority, without malicious purpose, and in a manner not exhibiting wanton and willful disregard of rights or property of another.
(7) The director of the department, or the director’s designee, is authorized to subpoena from any person financial and other information necessary to establish, modify, or enforce a child support order.
(a) For the purpose of establishing or modifying a child support order, or enforcing a support order, the director of the department or another state’s Title IV-D agency, or any employee designated by the director of the department or authorized under another state’s law, may administer oaths or affirmations, subpoena witnesses and compel their attendance, take evidence and require the production of any matter which is relevant to the support action, including the existence, description, nature, custody, condition, and location of any books, documents, or other tangible things and the identity and location of persons having knowledge of relevant facts or any other matter reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of material evidence.
(b) Subpoenas issued by the department or another state’s Title IV-D agency may be challenged in accordance with s. 120.569(2)(k)1. While a subpoena is being challenged, the department may not impose a fine as provided for under paragraph (c) until the challenge is complete and the subpoena has been found to be valid.
(c) The department is authorized to impose a fine for failure to comply with a subpoena. Failure to comply with the subpoena, or to challenge the subpoena as provided in paragraph (b), within 15 days after service of the subpoena may result in the agency taking the following actions:
1. Imposition of an administrative fine of not more than $500.
2. Enforcement of the subpoena as provided in s. 120.569(2)(k)2. When the subpoena is enforced pursuant to s. 120.569(2)(k)2., the court may award costs and fees to the prevailing party in accordance with that section.
(d) The department may seek to collect administrative fines imposed pursuant to paragraph (c) by filing a petition in the circuit court of the judicial circuit in which the person against whom the fine was imposed resides. All fines collected pursuant to this subsection shall be deposited into the Child Support Enforcement Application and Program Revenue Trust Fund.
(8) In cases in which support is subject to an assignment as provided under 45 C.F.R. s. 301.1, the department shall, upon providing notice to the obligor and obligee, direct the obligor or other payor to change the payee to the appropriate depository.
(9)(a) For the purpose of securing delinquent support, the department may increase the amount of the monthly support obligation to include amounts for delinquencies, subject to such conditions or limitations as set forth in paragraph (b).
(b) In support obligations not subject to income deduction, the department shall notify the obligor in writing of his or her delinquency and of the department’s intent to require an additional 20 percent of the monthly obligation amount to allow for collection of the delinquency unless, within 20 days, the obligor pays the delinquency in full or files a petition with the circuit court to contest the delinquency action.
(c) All written notices provided to an obligor regarding delinquent support must include information on how the obligor can access the web page required under s. 409.2557(4) and how to access services through CareerSource Florida, Inc., and the organizations that are awarded grants under s. 409.25996.
(10) For the purposes of denial, revocation, or limitation of an obligor’s United States passport, consistent with 42 U.S.C. s. 652(k)(1), the department shall have procedures to certify to the Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services that an obligor owes arrearages of support in an amount exceeding $2,500. Said procedures shall provide that the obligor be given notice of the determination and of the consequence thereof and an opportunity to contest the accuracy of the determination.
(11)(a) The Department of Revenue shall review child support orders in IV-D cases at least once every 3 years when requested by either party, or when support rights are assigned to the state under s. 414.095(7), and may seek modification of the order if appropriate under the child support guidelines in s. 61.30. Not less than once every 3 years the department shall provide notice to the parties subject to the order informing them of their right to request a review and, if appropriate, a modification of the child support order. The notice requirement may be met by including appropriate language in the initial support order or any subsequent orders.
(b) If the department’s review of a support order entered by the circuit court indicates that the order should be modified, the department, through counsel, shall file a petition to modify the order with the court. Along with the petition, the department shall file a child support guideline worksheet, any financial affidavits or written declarations, pursuant to s. 61.30(15), received from the parties or completed by the department as part of the support order review, a proposed modified order that includes findings as to the source and amount of income, and a notice that informs the parties of the requirement to file an objection or a request for hearing with the court if the party wants a court hearing on the petition to modify. A copy of the petition, proposed order, and other documents shall be served by regular mail on a party who requested the support order review. A party that did not request the support order review shall be served personally in any manner authorized under chapter 48.
(c) To obtain a court hearing on a petition to modify a support order, a party who is served by regular mail must file an objection to the proposed order or a request for hearing with the court within 30 days after the date on which the petition, proposed order, and other documents were mailed. If a party is served personally, to obtain a court hearing on a petition to modify the party must file an objection to the proposed order or a request for hearing with the court within 30 days after the date of receipt of the petition, proposed order, and other documents.
(d) If a timely objection or request for hearing is not filed with the court, the court may modify the support order without a hearing in accordance with the terms of the proposed order.
(e) If a support order does not provide for payment of noncovered medical expenses or require health insurance for the minor child and health insurance is accessible to the child and available at a reasonable cost, the department shall seek to have the order modified and any modification shall be made without a requirement for proof or showing of a change in circumstances.
(12)(a) When the department files a petition for modification of a child support order and the petition is accompanied with a verified motion signed by the department to redirect payment alleging that:
1. The child is residing with a relative caretaker as defined in s. 414.0252 and the relative caretaker receives temporary cash assistance as defined in s. 414.0252; or
2. The child was formerly residing with a relative caretaker as defined in s. 414.0252, the child support payments were redirected to the relative caretaker, and the child is now residing with the original payee,

then the court shall enter a temporary order, ex parte, within 5 days that redirects the child support payments to the relative caretaker or original payee pending a final hearing and may grant such relief as the court deems proper. Upon the filing of a verified motion by the department to redirect payment, the relative caretaker is deemed a party to the proceedings.

(b) In the event that it is subsequently determined by the court that the child support payments were improperly diverted, the department shall pay the improperly diverted child support payments to the appropriate party and shall attempt to recoup any child support improperly paid.
(13) The department shall have the authority to adopt rules to implement this section.
History.s. 5, ch. 76-220; s. 143, ch. 86-220; s. 20, ch. 92-138; s. 12, ch. 95-222; s. 89, ch. 96-175; s. 48, ch. 97-170; s. 39, ch. 98-280; s. 24, ch. 98-397; ss. 12, 13, ch. 99-375; s. 54, ch. 2000-153; s. 93, ch. 2000-165; s. 31, ch. 2001-158; ss. 28, 29, ch. 2005-39; s. 1, ch. 2005-61; s. 4, ch. 2007-85; s. 22, ch. 2008-61; s. 10, ch. 2010-187; s. 6, ch. 2017-117; s. 13, ch. 2022-67; s. 91, ch. 2023-8; s. 42, ch. 2025-153.

F.S. 409.2564 on Google Scholar

F.S. 409.2564 on CourtListener

Amendments to 409.2564


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 409.2564

Total Results: 29

DEPT. OF HEALTH & REHAB. SERV. v. Holland

602 So. 2d 652, 1992 WL 158125

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 1992 | Docket: 1321427

Cited 12 times | Published

Services. In this case, HRS, acting pursuant to section 409.2564(1), Florida Statutes (1991),[1] filed a suit

DEPT. OF REV. EX REL. PRESTON v. Cummings

871 So. 2d 1055

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 12, 2004 | Docket: 1709437

Cited 8 times | Published

duty to support *1059 the children involved. See § 409.2564(1), Fla. Stat. (2002) (requiring Department of

DHRS v. Crossdale

585 So. 2d 481

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 11, 1991 | Docket: 1688674

Cited 5 times | Published

409.2551, Florida Statutes (1989). Moreover, section 409.2564(1) says: Whenever applicable, the procedures

DEPT. OF REVENUE EX REL. JACKSON v. Nesbitt

975 So. 2d 549, 2008 WL 313471

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 6, 2008 | Docket: 1424670

Cited 4 times | Published

because the funds owed exceeded $5,000, citing section 409.2564, Florida Statutes (2006), section 51.70 of

Rogers v. Cooper

575 So. 2d 266, 1991 WL 17924

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 1991 | Docket: 1731392

Cited 4 times | Published

we affirm the order appealed. Pursuant to Section 409.2564, Florida Statutes, the department instituted

STATE, DHRS v. Harvey

593 So. 2d 611, 1992 WL 25918

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 14, 1992 | Docket: 1508895

Cited 3 times | Published

Cooper, 575 So.2d 266 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). Section 409.2564(1), Florida Statutes (1989), authorizes HRS

FLA. D. OF HEALTH & REHAB. SERVICES v. Cisneros

446 So. 2d 727

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 14, 1984 | Docket: 1780190

Cited 3 times | Published

statutory obligation under section 409.2561 and section 409.2564, Florida Statutes (1981), in good faith reliance

Thompson v. STATE, DEPT. OF REVENUE

867 So. 2d 603, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 2690, 2004 WL 401587

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 2004 | Docket: 1386234

Cited 1 times | Published

So.2d 499, 502-03 (Fla.1989). Pursuant to section 409.2564, Florida Statutes (2002), the Department filed

STATE, DEPT. OF HEALTH & REH. SERV. v. Hatfield

522 So. 2d 61

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 12, 1988 | Docket: 1191274

Cited 1 times | Published

to pay child support during that period. See § 409.2564, Fla. Stat. (1979). On August 9, 1984, Hatfield's

ANDREW BOUKZAM v. JOSSI JUGO

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 18, 2020 | Docket: 16986314

Published

2 The Department asserted that under section 409.2564, Florida Statutes, any order of support must

DOR v. Curtis

247 So. 3d 715

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 28, 2018 | Docket: 7094846

Published

enforcement as authorized under Title IV-D." § 409.2564(5), Fla. Stat. (2017) (footnotes omitted). Although

Florida Department of Revenue v. John Garrison Seeley and Sarah Ann Gilbride

213 So. 3d 974

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 20, 2016 | Docket: 3046124

Published

his child support payments in accordance with § 409.2564(1l)(a), Florida Statutes. DOR conducted the review

Department of Revenue obo Hanna May Rose Peterson v. Jeremiah Kenneth Johnson

177 So. 3d 697

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 2, 2015 | Docket: 3009226

Published

we grant DOR’s request. Pursuant to section 409.2564(ll)(a), Florida Statutes, DOR informed Respondent

Lopez v. Department of Revenue

201 So. 3d 119, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 14477

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 30, 2015 | Docket: 2863183

Published

had misidentified Lopez. 2 . Section 409.2564 of the Florida Statutes ' authorizes DOR to

Hoover v. Florida Department of Revenue ex rel. Mitchell

114 So. 3d 494, 2013 WL 2462119, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 9238

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 10, 2013 | Docket: 60231951

Published

which functioned as the “petition” under section 409.2564(ll)(b), Florida Statutes. § 61.14(ll)(b).

Department of Revenue v. McLeod

96 So. 3d 443, 2012 WL 3537235, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 13717

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 17, 2012 | Docket: 60311520

Published

representation are limited in scope as set forth in Section 409.2564(5), Florida Statutes.” The trial court conducted

Florida Department of Revenue v. Collingwood

43 So. 3d 952, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 13723, 2010 WL 3583985

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 16, 2010 | Docket: 2399989

Published

her a lesser amount. On the contrary, under section 409.2564(11), Florida Statutes (2010), the department

Liebert v. State, Department of Revenue ex rel. Liebert

748 So. 2d 344, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 16633, 1999 WL 1127719

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 10, 1999 | Docket: 64793816

Published

application filed with the department. ... Section 409.2564(1) provides: In each case in which regular

Hand v. Mensh & MacIntosh, P.A.

718 So. 2d 234, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 10447, 1998 WL 484058

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 19, 1998 | Docket: 64783161

Published

action for negligence by the Firm.1 However, section 409.2564(6), Florida Statutes (1995), provides immunity

Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services, State ex rel. Bollheimer v. Bollheimer

634 So. 2d 179, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1677, 1994 WL 63303

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 4, 1994 | Docket: 64747112

Published

PETERSON and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur. . See § 409.2564, Fla.Stat.

Fort v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services

626 So. 2d 302, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11177, 1993 WL 452693

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 5, 1993 | Docket: 64743911

Published

BROCK, N.D., Associate Judge, concur. . See § 409.2564, Fla.Stat. (Supp.1992). . See Atlantic Commercial

Taylor v. McGregor

616 So. 2d 159, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3602, 1993 WL 90536

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 30, 1993 | Docket: 64695263

Published

bring child support enforcement actions under section 409.-2564(1), Florida Statutes (1989). The statute provides

Eller v. Thomas

586 So. 2d 480, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 9433, 1991 WL 186983

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 25, 1991 | Docket: 64661784

Published

may not be addressed in such a proceeding. Section 409.2564(5), Florida Statutes, states: Whenever the

STATE, DHRS v. Savage

570 So. 2d 1089

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 4, 1990 | Docket: 1704053

Published

prior to such person reaching the age of 18. Section 409.2564(1) provides in pertinent part (emphasis added):

Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. Nolden

556 So. 2d 1176, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 544, 1990 WL 6440

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 1, 1990 | Docket: 64648157

Published

Services, the nominal appellant, is acting under section 409.2564, Florida Statutes, for the mother, who is

State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. Hatfield

522 So. 2d 61, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 443, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 565

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 12, 1988 | Docket: 64633559

Published

to pay child support during that period. See § 409.2564, Fla.Stat. (1979). On August 9, 1984, Hatfield’s

Washington v. James

471 So. 2d 647, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1601, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14816

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 25, 1985 | Docket: 64612759

Published

mother on issues relating to visitation, see § 409.2564, Fla.Stat. (1985), and that the mother was never

Camps v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services ex rel. Jamerson

459 So. 2d 1140, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2460, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15910

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 23, 1984 | Docket: 64608484

Published

child support payments, as contemplated by section 409.2564(1) and (2), Florida Statutes, for reimbursement

Mears v. Luterman

453 So. 2d 499, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1687, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14181

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 31, 1984 | Docket: 64606121

Published

reverse on the basis of the plain language of section 409.2564(1), Florida Statutes (1983), which states