Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 413.035 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 413.035 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 413.035

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXX
SOCIAL WELFARE
Chapter 413
EMPLOYMENT AND RELATED SERVICES FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 413.035
413.035 Duties and powers of the department.
(1) It shall be the duty of the department to determine the market price of all products and services offered for sale to the various agencies of the state by any qualified nonprofit agency for the blind or other severely handicapped. The price shall recover for the nonprofit agency the cost of raw materials, labor, overhead, and delivery, but without profit, and shall be revised from time to time in accordance with changing cost factors. The department shall make such rules and regulations regarding specifications, time of delivery, and assignment of products and services to be supplied by nonprofit agencies for the blind or by agencies for the other severely handicapped, with priority for assignment of products to agencies for the blind, authorization of a central nonprofit agency to facilitate the allocation of orders among qualified nonprofit agencies for the blind, authorization of a central nonprofit agency to facilitate the allocation of orders among qualified nonprofit agencies for other severely handicapped, and other relevant matters of procedure as shall be necessary to carry out the purposes of this act. The department shall authorize the purchase of products and services elsewhere when requisitions cannot reasonably be complied with through the nonprofit agencies for the blind and other severely handicapped.
(2) The department shall establish and publish a list of products and services provided by any qualified nonprofit agency for the blind and any nonprofit agency for the other severely handicapped, which the department determines are suitable for procurement by agencies of the state pursuant to this act. This procurement list and revision thereof shall be distributed to all purchasing officers of the state and its political subdivisions. All products offered for purchase to a state agency by a qualified nonprofit agency shall have significant value added by blind or severely handicapped persons, as determined by the department.
History.s. 4, ch. 74-236; s. 1, ch. 77-174; s. 4, ch. 78-323; ss. 3, 6, 7, ch. 81-11; ss. 1, 4, ch. 82-46; ss. 3, 4, ch. 88-37; s. 5, ch. 91-429; s. 39, ch. 2002-207.

F.S. 413.035 on Google Scholar

F.S. 413.035 on Casetext

Amendments to 413.035


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 413.035
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 413.035.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 413.035

Total Results: 6

Ferraro v. Mazurek

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1993-07-09

Citation: 621 So. 2d 532, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 7306, 1993 WL 247123

Snippet: generally Coe v. Armour Fertilizer Works, 237 U.S. 413, 35 S.Ct. 625, 59 L.Ed. 1027 (1915) (due process requires

Hill v. HCA Health Services of Florida, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1991-06-26

Citation: 582 So. 2d 701, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6116

Snippet: 376 (1979). Coe v. Armour Fertilizer, 237 U.S. 413, 35 S.Ct. 625, 59 L.Ed. 1027 (1915), held unconstitutional

In Re Hill

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1991-06-26

Citation: 582 So. 2d 701, 1991 WL 115160

Snippet: 376 (1979). Coe v. Armour Fertilizer, 237 U.S. 413, 35 S.Ct. 625, 59 L.Ed. 1027 (1915), held unconstitutional

Williams & Nobbs, Inc. v. Leon

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1932-12-29

Citation: 145 So. 191, 107 Fla. 487

Snippet: grounds in Coe v. Armour Fertilizer Works, 237 U.S. 413,35 Sup. Ct. 625, 59 L.Ed. 1027). It is evident from

Tibbetts v. Olson

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1926-05-03

Citation: 108 So. 679, 91 Fla. 824

Snippet: 410; Coe v. Armous Fertilizer Works, 237 U.S. 413, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 625; 12 C. J. 1228-1234; 6 R. C.

Sparkman v. State ex rel. Bank of Ybor City

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1916-02-15

Citation: 71 Fla. 210, 71 So. 34

Snippet: See Coe v. Armour Fertilizer Works, 237 U. S. 413, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 625. No question of fraud or imposition