Florida Statute 413.29 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXX
SOCIAL WELFARE

Chapter 413
EMPLOYMENT AND RELATED SERVICES FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 413.29

413.29 Gifts.—The division is hereby authorized and empowered to accept and use gifts made unconditionally by will or otherwise for carrying out the purposes of this part. Gifts made under such conditions as in the judgment of the division are proper and consistent with the provisions of this part and the laws of the United States and the laws of this state may be so accepted and shall be held, invested, reinvested, and used in accordance with the condition of the gift.

History.—s. 8, ch. 25364, 1949; s. 13, ch. 65-239; ss. 19, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 310, ch. 77-147; s. 113, ch. 79-164; s. 7, ch. 87-227; s. 15, ch. 94-324.

Note.—Former ss. 229.32, 229.0109.

F.S. 413.29 on Google Scholar

F.S. 413.29 on Casetext

Amendments to 413.29

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 413.29

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 413.29.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 413.29

Total Results: 3

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 1974-05-21T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: ;gifts" and materials (see ss. 396.052(2), 413.29, F.S.) but of these two only the Bureau of Alcoholic

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 1974-02-11T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: concluding, I have not overlooked the fact that s. 413.29, F.S., expressly authorizes the Division of Vocational…must be deposited in the state treasury. Thus, s. 413.29, when read in the light of s. 413.44, is not inconsistent…official other than the comptroller. In any event, s. 413.29 clearly contemplates that the gifts may be accepted

Evans, Et Ux. v. Hillsborough County

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1938-10-10T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 186 So. 193, 135 Fla. 471

Snippet: Commissioners of Wyandotte Co., et al., v. Hoag, 48 Kan. 413, 29 P. 758; Motz v. City of Detroit, 18 Mich. Rep.