Florida Statute 418.24 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXX
SOCIAL WELFARE

Chapter 418
RECREATION DISTRICTS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 418.24

418.24 Filing of ordinance.—Any ordinance creating or amending the charter of a recreation district, upon being finally adopted, shall be filed in the minutes of the governing body of the municipality or county, and certified copies thereof shall be filed with the county clerk of the county in which said district is located and with the property appraiser of said county. The charter of a recreation district may contain findings by the governing body of the municipality or county:

(1) That the creation of such district is the best alternative available for delivering recreational service.

(2) That such district is amenable to separate special district government.

(3) That all of the territory in the district will be benefited by proposed improvements to be made by said district.

(4) That, for recreation districts created for exclusive use by a condominium established pursuant to chapter 718 or a cooperative established under chapter 719, based upon the number of residents, potential for proliferation of crime, automobile traffic flow, district development, availability of other recreational facilities outside the district, excessive noise levels, or other factors applicable to the particular district, a valid and paramount public purpose will be served by making the recreational facilities available exclusively for district residents and property owners.

If such charter contains any one or more such findings, each such finding may be reviewed by a court only as part of any review of the ordinance making such finding.

History.—s. 6, ch. 78-237; s. 26, ch. 94-350.

F.S. 418.24 on Google Scholar

F.S. 418.24 on Casetext

Amendments to 418.24

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 418.24

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 418.24.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 418.24

Total Results: 14

Patterson v. Allstate Ins. Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2004-07-23

Citation: 884 So. 2d 178, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 10986

Snippet: 115 So. 532 (1927); Da Costa v. Dibble, 40 Fla. 418, 24 So. 911 (1898); Ormond Beach Assocs., Ltd. v. Citation

Meyer v. Solomon

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1958-11-20

Citation: 107 So. 2d 775

Snippet: Willis, 6 Fla. 359; Da Costa v. Dibble, 40 Fla. 418, 24 So. 911; Robbins v. Hanbury, 37 Fla. 468, 19 So

Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co. v. Lumber Mutual Casualty Insurance

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1944-12-05

Citation: 19 So. 2d 865, 155 Fla. 297, 1944 Fla. LEXIS 526

Snippet: Fla. 496, 50 So. 867; DaCosta v. Dibble, 40 Fla. 418, 24 So. 911. Other additions to the second amended

Masser v. the London Operating Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1932-08-23

Citation: 145 So. 72, 106 Fla. 474

Snippet: on other grounds. Da Costa vs. Dibble, 40 Fla. 418, 24 So.2d 911. See also 34 C. J. 792. A decree rendered

Okeechobee Co. v. Rambo

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1931-11-24

Citation: 138 So. 761, 103 Fla. 687

Snippet: against it there. Da Costa v. Dibble, 40 Fla. 418, 24 Sou. Rep. 411; Henderson v. Chaires, 35 Fla. 423

Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. Grey

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1930-10-21

Citation: 130 So. 274, 100 Fla. 958

Snippet: Equity Rule No. 86; DaCosta v. Dibble, 40 Fla. 418, 24 So. R. 211. The answer here was not a complete

Horter v. Commercial Bank & Trust Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1930-03-26

Citation: 126 So. 909, 99 Fla. 678

Snippet: inference or conclusion. DaCosta v. Dibble, 40 Fla. 418, 24 So. R. 911; Story's Equity Pleading 10th Ed. 662

Syndicate Properties, Inc. v. Hotel Floridian Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1927-11-08

Citation: 114 So. 441, 94 Fla. 899

Snippet: the whole bill. See Da Costa v. Dibble, 40 Fla. 418, 24 S. R. 911; Waring v. Bass, 76 Fla. 583, 80 So.2d

Harvey v. Morgan

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1909-06-15

Citation: 58 Fla. 427

Snippet: overruled upon argument. DaCosta v. Dibble, 40 Fla. 418, 24 South. Rep. 911; Langdell on Eq. Pl., Chap. 98

Meffert v. Thomas

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1906-01-15

Citation: 51 Fla. 492

Snippet: Willis, 6 Fla. 359; Da-Costa v. Dibble, 40 Fla. 418, 24 South. Rep. 911; Robbins v. Hanbury, 37 Fla. 468

Lindsley v. McIver

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1906-01-15

Citation: 51 Fla. 463

Snippet: said by this court in DaCosta v. Dibble, 40 Fla. 418, 24 South. Rep. 911, “A plea of equity setting up a

Lykes v. Beauchamp

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1905-01-15

Citation: 49 Fla. 333

Snippet: recent date. The case of DaCosta v. Dibble, 40 Fla. 418, 24 South. Rep. 911, is in point and is adverse to

Keen v. Brown

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1903-06-15

Citation: 46 Fla. 487

Snippet: court in the case of DaCosta v. Dibble, 40 Fla. 418, 24 South. Rep. 911, that a plea in equity setting

DaCosta v. Dibble

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1903-01-15

Citation: 45 Fla. 225

Snippet: (DaCosta, Executor, v. Dibble et al., 40 Fla. 418, 24 South. Rep. 911.) an order was entered overruling