Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 435.2 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 435.02 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 435.02 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 435.02

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XXXI
LABOR
Chapter 435
EMPLOYMENT SCREENING
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 435.02
435.02 Definitions.For the purposes of this chapter, the term:
(1) “Affiliation” means the status of a person employed or serving as a volunteer or contractor, or seeking to be employed or to serve as a volunteer or contractor, with a qualified entity in a position for which screening is not required by law but is authorized under the National Child Protection Act.
(2) “Agency” means any state, county, or municipal agency that grants licenses or registration permitting the operation of an employer or is itself an employer or that otherwise facilitates the screening of employees pursuant to this chapter. If there is no state agency or the municipal or county agency chooses not to conduct employment screening, “agency” means the Department of Children and Families.
(3) “Employee” means any person required by law to be screened pursuant to this chapter, including, but not limited to, persons who are contractors, licensees, or volunteers.
(4) “Employer” means any person or entity required by law to conduct screening of employees pursuant to this chapter.
(5) “Employment” means any activity or service sought to be performed by an employee or a person with an affiliation which requires the employee, or for which a person with an affiliation is authorized, to be screened pursuant to this chapter.
(6) “Qualified entity” has the same meaning as in s. 943.0542(1).
(7) “Specified agency” means the Department of Health, the Department of Children and Families, the Agency for Health Care Administration, the Department of Elderly Affairs, the Department of Juvenile Justice, the Agency for Persons with Disabilities, the Department of Education, the Department of Veterans’ Affairs, each district unit under s. 1001.30, special district units under s. 1011.24, the Florida School for the Deaf and the Blind under s. 1002.36, the Florida Virtual School under s. 1002.37, virtual instruction programs under s. 1002.45, charter schools under s. 1002.33, hope operators under s. 1002.333, private schools participating in an educational scholarship program established pursuant to chapter 1002, alternative schools under s. 1008.341, regional workforce boards providing services as defined in s. 445.002(3), and local licensing agencies approved pursuant to s. 402.307, when these agencies are conducting state and national criminal history background screening on persons who work with children or persons who are elderly or disabled.
(8) “Vulnerable person” means a minor as defined in s. 1.01 or a vulnerable adult as defined in s. 415.102.
History.s. 47, ch. 95-228; s. 207, ch. 99-8; s. 36, ch. 2010-114; s. 9, ch. 2012-73; s. 257, ch. 2014-19; s. 10, ch. 2015-79; s. 7, ch. 2021-25; s. 1, ch. 2022-154; s. 1, ch. 2023-220; s. 1, ch. 2025-150.

F.S. 435.02 on Google Scholar

F.S. 435.02 on CourtListener

Amendments to 435.02


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 435.02

Total Results: 18

McCain v. Florida Power Corporation

593 So. 2d 500, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 64, 1992 Fla. LEXIS 103, 1992 WL 10612

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 23, 1992 | Docket: 2516524

Cited 467 times | Published

about the harm." Restatement (Second) of Torts § 435(2) (1965). Unlike in the "duty" context, the question

City of Pinellas Park v. Brown

604 So. 2d 1222, 1992 WL 171211

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 23, 1992 | Docket: 2516223

Cited 60 times | Published

at 504 (quoting Restatement (Second) of Torts § 435(2) (1965). Where reasonable persons may differ on

Springtree Properties, Inc. v. Hammond

692 So. 2d 164, 1997 WL 182885

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 17, 1997 | Docket: 181948

Cited 18 times | Published

at 504 (quoting Restatement (Second) of Torts, § 435(2)(1965)). In other words, the court should grant

Coker v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

642 So. 2d 774, 1994 WL 483397

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 8, 1994 | Docket: 173020

Cited 16 times | Published

504, quoting from Restatement (Second) of Torts § 435(2) (1965). The trial court in the present case resolved

Janis v. Pratt & Whitney Canada, Inc.

370 F. Supp. 2d 1226, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13916, 2005 WL 1307666

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 1, 2005 | Docket: 2392747

Cited 10 times | Published

'" Id. (quoting Restatement (Second) of Torts § 435(2) (1965)). The Florida Supreme Court has expressly

Deese v. McKinnonville Hunting Club, Inc.

874 So. 2d 1282, 2004 WL 1360865

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 18, 2004 | Docket: 1473824

Cited 8 times | Published

about the harm." Restatement (Second) of Torts § 435(2) (1965). Unlike in the "duty" context, the question

In Re New River Shipyard, Inc.

355 B.R. 894, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 221, 2006 Bankr. LEXIS 3469

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Dec 8, 2006 | Docket: 1735519

Cited 7 times | Published

504, quoting from Restatement (Second) of Torts § 435(2) (1965). MSM cannot get past McCain's first step

The City of Ocala v. Graham

864 So. 2d 473, 2004 WL 19494

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 2, 2004 | Docket: 1727693

Cited 5 times | Published

about the harm." Restatement (Second) of Torts § 435(2) (1965). Unlike in the "duty" context the question

Klaue v. Galencare, Inc.

696 So. 2d 933, 1997 WL 374199

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 1997 | Docket: 1695962

Cited 5 times | Published

503-504 (quoting from Restatement (Second) of Torts § 435(2) (1965)). The court observed, however, that a trial

Clark v. Polk County

753 So. 2d 138, 2000 WL 139757

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 9, 2000 | Docket: 1433927

Cited 4 times | Published

1992) (quoting Restatement (Second) of Torts, § 435(2)(1965)). The issue may be decided by the court

Hiram Walker & Sons, Inc. v. Kirk Line

877 F.2d 1508, 1989 WL 72756

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 21, 1989 | Docket: 66245625

Cited 4 times | Published

about the harm.” Restatement (Second) of Torts § 435(2). The court may yet draw that conclusion after

Barnes v. Gulf Power Co.

517 So. 2d 717, 1987 WL 2664

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 1987 | Docket: 540998

Cited 4 times | Published

grounds. The above statements are consistent with section 435(2) of the Restatement, which asserts: "The actor's

Loomis v. Howell

604 So. 2d 1241, 1992 WL 206377

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 28, 1992 | Docket: 1686302

Cited 3 times | Published

at 504 (quoting Restatement (Second) of Torts § 435(2) (1965)). Where reasonable persons may differ on

Estate of Brennan v. Church of Scientology Flag Service Organization, Inc.

832 F. Supp. 2d 1370, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 140188, 2011 WL 6048687

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 6, 2011 | Docket: 65977475

Cited 1 times | Published

about the harm.” Restatement (Second) of Torts § 435(2) (1965). 593 So.2d at 503-04. The Supreme Court

Olson v. Crowell Plumbing & Heating Co.

48 So. 3d 139, 31 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1005, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 17703, 2010 WL 4721150

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 19, 2010 | Docket: 2398072

Cited 1 times | Published

about the harm." Restatement (Second) of Torts § 435(2) (1965). Graham, 864 So.2d at 477-78. The crux

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Oct 16, 2007 | Docket: 3258139

Published

domestic violence as defined in s. 741.30." Section 435.02(3), Florida Statutes, defines "Licensing agency"

Sipes v. Albertson's Inc.

728 So. 2d 1243, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 4580, 1999 WL 193115

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 9, 1999 | Docket: 64787070

Published

about the harm.” Restatement (Second) of Torts § 435(2) (1965). Id. at 503-04. In my opinion, this is

The Complaint of Hercules Carriers, Inc. v. Florida

720 F.2d 1201, 1984 A.M.C. 2962, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 15248

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 16, 1983 | Docket: 66194189

Published

not foresee the consequences. Res. of Torts 2d § 435(2). Recovery will likewise be denied when the damages